RE: [Proposal] Tomcat 3.2b8

2000-11-17 Thread Nacho
Hola a todos: cycle (3.2b8) before calling it good. We need to make sure that we didn't introduce any regression errors with all the bug fixes -- and we need to resolve the JSP issues that Larry raised this morning. +1 to 3.2b8 +1 to Larry fix of jasper. I propose to do a 3.2b8

Re: [Proposal] Tomcat 3.2b8

2000-11-17 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Nacho wrote: Hola a todos: cycle (3.2b8) before calling it good. We need to make sure that we didn't introduce any regression errors with all the bug fixes -- and we need to resolve the JSP issues that Larry raised this morning. +1 to 3.2b8 +1 to Larry fix of jasper. I

Re: [Proposal] Tomcat 3.2b8

2000-11-17 Thread Hans Bergsten
"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: [...] I propose to do a 3.2b8 build on Monday afternoon (which should give us time to address the remaining b7 issues that I know about). What do you think? +1 Hans -- Hans Bergsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gefion Software

Re: [Proposal] Tomcat 3.2b8

2000-11-17 Thread Glenn Nielsen
Tomcat 3.2 has a host config in server.xml for configuring multiple web server vitual hosts in a single Tomcat instance. I have been testing the host config option in server.xml. I had not tested that option to this point. I have not had any success getting it to work. (Haven't looked at the

Re: [Proposal] Tomcat 3.2b8

2000-11-17 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Gomez Henri wrote: I propose to do a 3.2b8 build on Monday afternoon (which should give us time to address the remaining b7 issues that I know about). What do you think? RPM will be release just after ;-) Thank you for faithfully doing these, by the way :-). Which are