Re: Initial test of APR on Solaris

2005-05-04 Thread Mladen Turk
Bill Barker wrote: I can get the test to finish if I synchronize around the 'Poll.poll' statement in the Poller. However, doing this sends the perfomance right through the floor :(. I'm guessing it's a problem with doing an add and/or remove (most likely remove, since it hangs when test threads

Re: Initial test of APR on Solaris

2005-05-04 Thread Remy Maucherat
Bill Barker wrote: I can get the test to finish if I synchronize around the 'Poll.poll' statement in the Poller. However, doing this sends the perfomance right through the floor :(. I'm guessing it's a problem with doing an add and/or Yes, it's probably too extreme syncing (100 ms locking) ;)

Re: Initial test of APR on Solaris

2005-05-03 Thread Remy Maucherat
Bill Barker wrote: Yeah, that works for me as well. My problem now is that the APRized HTTP Connector dies about 70% of the way through a test when I use the HTTPClient option in JMeter. A thread-dump shows all of the Workers waiting, and the Poller polling, but nothing is happening. It's a bit

Re: Initial test of APR on Solaris

2005-05-03 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 1:43 AM Subject: Re: Initial test of APR on Solaris Bill Barker wrote: Yeah, that works for me as well. My problem now is that the APRized

Re: Initial test of APR on Solaris

2005-05-03 Thread Peter Lin
On 5/3/05, Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Original Message - From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 1:43 AM Subject: Re: Initial test of APR on Solaris Bill Barker wrote: Yeah

Re: Initial test of APR on Solaris

2005-05-03 Thread Remy Maucherat
Bill Barker wrote: It's hard to tell what is going wrong. Is there logging showing attempted requests and failure codes ? Interestingly, the non-HTTPClient option never seems to get above ~62 concurrency. This looks suspicious to me, as it's the same constant size as the poller on Windows.

Re: Initial test of APR on Solaris

2005-05-03 Thread Mladen Turk
Remy Maucherat wrote: Bill Barker wrote: It's hard to tell what is going wrong. Is there logging showing attempted requests and failure codes ? Interestingly, the non-HTTPClient option never seems to get above ~62 concurrency. This looks suspicious to me, as it's the same constant size as the

Re: Initial test of APR on Solaris

2005-05-03 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 9:57 AM Subject: Re: Initial test of APR on Solaris Remy Maucherat wrote: Bill Barker wrote: It's hard to tell what is going wrong

Re: Initial test of APR on Solaris

2005-05-03 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 11:30 AM Subject: Re: Initial test of APR on Solaris - Original Message - From: Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers

Re: Initial test of APR on Solaris

2005-05-02 Thread Remy Maucherat
Bill Barker wrote: I was surprised that it worked at 150. I guess my crappy XP box was too slow to give real throughput :). The OOM message came from ThreadPool, which doesn't log stack traces. I'll need to hack ThreadPool to see where it's getting thrown from. The box is pretty old and

Re: Initial test of APR on Solaris

2005-05-02 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 3:59 PM Subject: Re: Initial test of APR on Solaris Bill Barker wrote: I was surprised that it worked at 150. I guess my crappy XP box

Re: Initial test of APR on Solaris

2005-04-30 Thread Remy Maucherat
Bill Barker wrote: I've finally had some time to get the new APR Connector compiled on my Solaris box, and my initial 'ab' tests seem to show that the Http11Protocol wins. I can see if I can get some time to do better tests next week. ab is great for measuring throughput, and that's it. This

Re: Initial test of APR on Solaris

2005-04-30 Thread Remy Maucherat
Mladen Turk wrote: ab can not put an wait between the keep-alive requests, so basically you are just choking you network throughput and killing keep-alive cons. Since it can not put an wait neither the poller can have a chance to work. When using ab for testing then you should not exceed the

Re: Initial test of APR on Solaris

2005-04-30 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005 1:38 AM Subject: Re: Initial test of APR on Solaris Mladen Turk wrote: ab can not put an wait between the keep-alive requests, so basically

Re: Initial test of APR on Solaris

2005-04-29 Thread Mladen Turk
Bill Barker wrote: I've finally had some time to get the new APR Connector compiled on my Solaris box, and my initial 'ab' tests seem to show that the Http11Protocol wins. I can see if I can get some time to do better tests next week. The test consists of running 'ab' from an XP box like: ab -n