Re: AGAIN: How can you deploy an application onto a specific host?

2004-07-08 Thread Florian Ebeling
Hi Ivan, you have to configure the manager app for each single host. So there is no ambiguity. host1.com/manager/ gets you the first, host2.com/manager/ the second, and so on. The host HTTP header is required in HTTP/1.1 requests. In any other case you hit the default host. Best -Florian Ivan

Re: ROOT problems

2004-05-31 Thread Florian Ebeling
Hi, remeber that the ROOT webapp is precompiled. So if you alter index.jsp nothing will happen, which might confuse you. -Florian Ilan Azbel wrote: Hello, I am having trouble locating the ROOT of my tomcat server. I have a line in the server.xml file that reads: Context path= docBase=ROOT

Re: Newbie Help

2004-02-25 Thread Florian Ebeling
Hi Jason, there is a fine tutorial covering this stuff. It contains a build.xml file which is similar to the deployer script. I think the latter evolved from the former. It contains also recommendations for directory layouts, etc. You find it here:

Re: jk2: [error] mod_jk child init 1 0 with win98

2004-02-24 Thread Florian Ebeling
Hi, has anyone any further insight on this special topic? My error.log is also polluted by this error message. There was no response to the original question quoted, which is from 6. Dec. 2003. Hans-Peter Fier wrote: During Apache-startup an error [error] mod_jk child init 1 0 occurs. Does

Re: dbcp doesn't stacktrace

2003-12-14 Thread Florian Ebeling
Hi Marten, Marten Lehmann wrote: to test dbcp's stacktrace functionality, I didn't close the databases connection after use. But although I set the abondedTimeout to 60, the connections are never returned, they are still open and I don't see a stacktrace, too. You only get stack traces when

jikes/Win32 with encoding

2003-12-04 Thread Florian Ebeling
Hi, I built jikes for win32 with -encoding compiled in and I wonder if anyone cares to use it, for example for JSP compilation, as suggested in the Definitive Guide. Without thsi option, it was impossible to use jikes in conjuction with ant. http://www.javaroom.de/index.html Best, -Florian

Re: Can Tomcat run on JRE only?

2003-11-20 Thread Florian Ebeling
Hi Thierry, you can compile JSPs into Java source code using the jspc. But this is rather meant for debugging and interpreting stack trace line numbers and the like. You could generate source and compile. But you still would have to invoke them. I don't know how one could convince the

Relationship between server.xml/Resource and web.xml/resource-ref.

2003-11-19 Thread Florian Ebeling
to that of an implementation class instance and an interface? Or are some things possible with server.xml/Resource (plus ResourceParams) that are not possible with only modifying the DD? Can anyone clarify this? TIA, -Florian -- Florian Ebeling, Dipl.-Ing. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel. +49 172 926 76 26

Relationship between server.xml/Resource and web.xml/resource-ref.

2003-11-19 Thread Florian Ebeling
that is similar to that of an implementation class instance and an interface? Or are some things possible with server.xml/Resource (plus ResourceParams) that are not possible with only modifying the DD? Can anyone clarify this? TIA, -Florian -- Florian Ebeling, Dipl.-Ing. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel. +49 172

Re: problems with dbcp

2003-11-03 Thread Florian Ebeling
Hi, you probably do nor close some statement, resultSet or connection. When using CP one has to do this always explicitly. Tyrex is an alternative CP implementation which has been replaced by DBCP. Edson Alves Pereira wrote: Hello folks, i followed what is written in tomcat-4.1.x´s

Re: problems with dbcp

2003-11-03 Thread Florian Ebeling
/parameter /ResourceParams Edson Alves Pereira wrote: But removeAbandoned and removeAbandonedTimeout doesn´t close all ResultSet, Statement and Connections even if they are forsaken? -- De: Florian Ebeling[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Responder: Tomcat Users

Re: Deploying TOMCAT on live production server

2003-11-03 Thread Florian Ebeling
Hi, Apache is faster for static content and has shorter startup times. And HTTP implemenation is probably more mature in a pure HTTP server like apache. Steve Jenkins wrote: Hi, Wonder if anyone can help. I keep reading that one should not deploy TOMCAT on its' own on a live production

Re: problems with dbcp

2003-11-03 Thread Florian Ebeling
, Why dont you override the finialize method so that when your objects fall out of scope and are garbage collected then you close the connections ? Thanks Pete -Original Message- From: Florian Ebeling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 November 2003 13:27 To: Tomcat Users List

Re: problems with dbcp

2003-11-03 Thread Florian Ebeling
Hi, Edson Alves Pereira wrote: Hello folks, i followed what is written in tomcat-4.1.x´s JDNI DataSource documentation, but i getting this error: java.sql.SQLException: DBCP could not obtain an idle db connection, pool exhausted Edson, which Tomcat versions do you use? I was puzzled why

Re: problems with dbcp

2003-11-03 Thread Florian Ebeling
I have here tomcat-4.1.24. Then you should certainly try an upgrade. 29 uses DBCP 1.1, which was released like 2 weeks ago or something. But only dbcp.jar does not suffiece, commons-collection (or -pool, cant remember) has changed also. I took the whole new tomcat. -Florian Edson Alves

Re: Which version of xerces, Tomcat 4.1.24 is using?

2003-11-01 Thread Florian Ebeling
soapboxI would like to see the java community begin naming their jars with the version, the same way the linux community labels their tarballs. Thank you/soapbox That's what I thought so manny times! The ecplise guys do it already. -Florian

Re: jk or jk2

2003-10-31 Thread Florian Ebeling
some things I have figured out from reading numerous posts here and from other sites. I will repost an updated documentation as soon as all my testing is done. http://www.computingoasis.com/apache download the PDF please. -Dean -Original Message- From: Florian Ebeling [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: jk or jk2

2003-10-30 Thread Florian Ebeling
Hi, mod_jk2 is more or less undocumented. If you dont't want to dive into the C sources, be careful. mod_jk comes with quite solid descriptions. -Florian Bernhard Erdmann wrote: Cory 'G' Watson wrote: If starting a new _production_ setup, should I be using jk or jk2? I've seen conflicting

Re: jk or jk2

2003-10-30 Thread Florian Ebeling
Hi Bernhard, Here's a great book including mod_jk2: http://www.oreilly.de/catalog/tomcat/index.html I got this book right next to my laptop, and I also like it quite much. But I can't find it useful when it comes to using mod_jk2. It don't really understand the contents of

mod_jk2 binary for Apache 2.0.47/Win

2003-10-28 Thread Florian Ebeling
Hi, I am trying to integrate Tomcat with Apache2 via the mod_jk2 module and CoyoteConnector on the Java side. Nothing experimental here, so far. Problem is 1) the module needs to be compiled against exactly the same Apache version into which it is to be deployed later 2) the only binary

Re: mod_jk2 binary for Apache 2.0.47/Win

2003-10-28 Thread Florian Ebeling
Hi Jean-Max, this won't work, Apache accepts only modules with exactly matching version numbers. I tried the mod_jk module, because this one is in sync with the Apache2 release. You can get it here: http://www.apache.de/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/win32/ mod_jk is deprecated,

Re: mod_jk2 binary for Apache 2.0.47/Win

2003-10-28 Thread Florian Ebeling
This is all you need to configure Asif -Original Message- From: Florian Ebeling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 7:32 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: mod_jk2 binary for Apache 2.0.47/Win Hi, I am trying to integrate Tomcat with Apache2 via the mod_jk2 module

Re: mod_jk2 binary for Apache 2.0.47/Win

2003-10-28 Thread Florian Ebeling
and there. This is not the most predictable of all methods, perhaps. Regards, -Florian Asif Chowdhary wrote: No I dont have that file in the conf directory. The documentation is very confusing. It works fine -Original Message- From: Florian Ebeling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 10:56

Re: mod_jk2 binary for Apache 2.0.47/Win

2003-10-28 Thread Florian Ebeling
Jean-Max, I was wrong assuming that one needs a mod_jk2 needs to bear the exactly same version number as the Apache2. I didn't even give it a try, because I read it at several places in the apache docs. I got mod_jk2 running now, with kind assistance of Asif Chowdhary, as you probably hab been

Tomcat 4.0.x

2003-10-17 Thread Florian Ebeling
Hi, I'm trying to find an ancient 4.0 to do some experimenting. The download sites seem to have abandoned this release alltogether. Does anybody knows of a source for this thing? Thanks, -Florian Justin Ruthenbeck wrote: At 06:12 PM 10/16/2003, you wrote: Running Tomcat 4.1.27, I'm

Re: Tomcat 4.0.x

2003-10-17 Thread Florian Ebeling
-Original Message- From: Florian Ebeling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: October 17, 2003 12:32 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Tomcat 4.0.x Hi, I'm trying to find an ancient 4.0 to do some experimenting. The download sites seem to have abandoned this release alltogether. Does anybody knows

Restrict manager app to Contexts in one (virtual) Host

2003-10-16 Thread Florian Ebeling
Hi there, I wonder if there is any means to give users access to the manager application, but let them only manipulate contexts located within their own virtual Hosts? I think this question is one every ISP has to stumble across, provided he doesn't want to get please restart ... mails all

Re: Restrict manager app to Contexts in one (virtual) Host

2003-10-16 Thread Florian Ebeling
security constraints - Creating another webapp which does all authorization then calls the manager app via a nested HttpRequest -Tim Florian Ebeling wrote: Hi there, I wonder if there is any means to give users access to the manager application, but let them only manipulate contexts located within

Re: Restrict manager app to Contexts in one (virtual) Host

2003-10-16 Thread Florian Ebeling
Hi, Tim Funk wrote: Yes, you are OK if you restrict access to a single Host. My answer was geared towards finer grain control of restarting(or whatever) webapps within a single host. If all requirements are at the host level - I think your ok with what you have below. Host level is perfect