lto:jfn@;msc.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 5:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Apache+Tomcat Configuration problems
>
>
>
> OK, I'm about ready to scream. Although I'm certain that I've
> missed something appallingly simple, I have no idea
002 02:29 PM
Please respond to "Tomcat Users List"
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:Apache+Tomcat Configuration problems
OK, I'm about ready to scream. Although I'm certain that I've
missed something appallingly simple, I h
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, J.F. Noonan wrote:
> OK, I'm about ready to scream. Although I'm certain that I've
> missed something appallingly simple, I have no idea what that
> something is.
>
> I have installed Tomcat tomcat4-4.1.12-full.2jpp.noarch.rpm on a
> RH7.3 system. I have compiled and install
OK, I'm about ready to scream. Although I'm certain that I've
missed something appallingly simple, I have no idea what that
something is.
I have installed Tomcat tomcat4-4.1.12-full.2jpp.noarch.rpm on a
RH7.3 system. I have compiled and installed Apache 1.3.27 with
mod_ssl, EAPI, and mod_so. I
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 9:43 AM
Subject: Apache-Tomcat configuration problems: PLEASE HELP
> Hi, I've been trying to get Tomcat and Apache configured to avoid the need
> to reference the port number in the URL. Instead of
> http://localhost:8080/,
Hi, I've been trying to get Tomcat and Apache configured to avoid the need
to reference the port number in the URL. Instead of
http://localhost:8080/, I want to be able to say
http://localhost/servlet/. Isn't that what mod_jk is supposed to do for
me? At the moment I just like to get the s
