FW: Help!! -uncaught CharConversionException ?

2004-08-04 Thread Yoav Niderman
Hiya All, We have some standard JSP page that gets some parameters URLEncoded the usual way, (using GET) Once you take the URL and add the percent % character at the end of the URL (just after a parameter) - the entire page crashes throwing java.io.CharConversionException We tried

RE: Help!! -uncaught CharConversionException ?

2004-08-04 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Yoav Niderman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 4:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FW: Help!! -uncaught CharConversionException ? Hiya All, We have some standard JSP page that gets some parameters URLEncoded

RE: CharConversionException: isHexDigit

2003-05-30 Thread Shapira, Yoav
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CharConversionException: isHexDigit From the code (and stack-trace), the problem is with an unescaped '%' sign in the query-string. Something like: /foo.jsp?progress=58%foo=bar or /foo.jsp?value=%xy. If your machine is connected to the internet, then I think

RE: CharConversionException: isHexDigit

2003-05-29 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Message- From: Joel Carklin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 4:27 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: CharConversionException: isHexDigit hi everyone, i was wondering if anyone else has come across the following exception being thrown. i don't know what causes

RE: CharConversionException: isHexDigit

2003-05-29 Thread Roberts, Eric
- From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 May 2003 15:07 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: CharConversionException: isHexDigit Howdy, Dude -- I got the exact same thing yesterday and posted it! ;) Still looking for the answer. I don't think it's a rare browser: 100% of my

RE: CharConversionException: isHexDigit

2003-05-29 Thread Shapira, Yoav
in catalina.out were time-stamped. Yoav Shapira Millennium ChemInformatics -Original Message- From: Roberts, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 9:48 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: CharConversionException: isHexDigit I bet it could be a rare browser. Closed

Re: CharConversionException: isHexDigit

2003-05-29 Thread Jason Bainbridge
On Wed, 28 May 2003 21:53, Shapira, Yoav wrote: When I was saying 100% of my hits are from either IE5.5 or IE6 on Windows 2000 I meant exactly that, having analyzed the logs programmatically (webalizer) and manually (using awk) and not found any user agents not on the above short list. User

RE: CharConversionException: isHexDigit

2003-05-29 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Howdy, User agents aren't 100% reliable and I think I remember something about Opera identifying itself as IE by default at one stage. Often when you're using an alternative browser you come across a site that insists on using IE so you change your user agent so you can use the site but forget

RE: CharConversionException: isHexDigit

2003-05-29 Thread Cox, Charlie
a closed environment). HTH, Charlie -Original Message- From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 12:31 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: CharConversionException: isHexDigit Howdy, User agents aren't 100% reliable and I think I remember

RE: CharConversionException: isHexDigit

2003-05-29 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Howdy, couldn't you set up an error-page that only runs for this exception and then print out the parameters from that page? Or does the request not get that far? If not write a valve/responseWrapper that catches response 500 errors and act upon it. It doesn't get that far. Shouldn't your

Re: CharConversionException: isHexDigit

2003-05-29 Thread Bill Barker
From the code (and stack-trace), the problem is with an unescaped '%' sign in the query-string. Something like: /foo.jsp?progress=58%foo=bar or /foo.jsp?value=%xy. If your machine is connected to the internet, then I think that there are a couple of IIS traversal worms that send something like

CharConversionException: isHexDigit

2003-05-28 Thread Joel Carklin
hi everyone, i was wondering if anyone else has come across the following exception being thrown. i don't know what causes it and it doesn't seem to affect the web applications I'm running but I'm a bit concerned about it. It appears now and then, not very frequently, but often enough, in my

CharConversionException

2003-05-27 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Howdy, Has anyone been seeing java.io.CharConversionException: isHexDigit at org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.UDecoder.convert(UDecoder.java:124) at org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.UDecoder.convert(UDecoder.java:87) at org.apache.tomcat.util.http.Parameters.processParameters(Parameters.java :408) ?

Re: CharConversionException

2003-05-27 Thread Andre E. Bar'yudin
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 02:24:50PM -0400, Shapira, Yoav wrote: Howdy, Has anyone been seeing java.io.CharConversionException: isHexDigit at org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.UDecoder.convert(UDecoder.java:124) at org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.UDecoder.convert(UDecoder.java:87) at

RE: CharConversionException

2003-05-27 Thread Shapira, Yoav
on average. Moreover, the exception in CharConversionException catalina.out does not have a timestamp to narrow down my search. Any suggestions? This is a stand-alone tomcat setup. A Coyote HTTP connector. No apache, no JK, no other connectors. Yoav Shapira This e-mail, including any attachments

Re: CharConversionException

2003-05-27 Thread Andre E. Bar'yudin
are very large, however, as I get thousands of requests per hour on average. Moreover, the exception in CharConversionException catalina.out does not have a timestamp to narrow down my search. Any suggestions? This is a stand-alone tomcat setup. A Coyote HTTP connector. No apache, no JK

RE: CharConversionException

2003-05-27 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Howdy, No timestamping is bad... is increasing the debug level of the connector an option for you? I suppose I could try that. Heopfully the exception will come up again after I do. My wild guess is that there could be a mismatch between the request declared (or assumed by tomcat/defined in

Re: CharConversionException

2003-05-27 Thread Andre E. Bar'yudin
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 03:43:25PM -0400, Shapira, Yoav wrote: Howdy, No timestamping is bad... is increasing the debug level of the connector an option for you? I suppose I could try that. Heopfully the exception will come up again after I do. My wild guess is that there could be