Shanmugam.PL
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, shanmugampl wrote:
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 14:13:57 +0530
From: shanmugampl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Doubt in Single Sign On !!!
Hi All,
I am
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, shanmugampl wrote:
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 10:46:13 +0530
From: shanmugampl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Doubt in Single Sign On !!!
Yeah, I accept
From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: Doubt in Single Sign On !!!
The reason for this design is security.
Consider a portal-type application like My Yahoo, which implements their
version of single sign on (you don't have to log
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Will Hartung wrote:
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 13:32:46 -0800
From: Will Hartung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Doubt in Single Sign On !!!
From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED
From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: Doubt in Single Sign On !!!
True ... there is no such thing as a cross-application session defined in
the servlet spec.
You're outside the bounds of the servlet spec when you talk about
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: Doubt in Single Sign On !!!
True ... there is no such thing as a cross-application session defined in
the servlet spec.
You're outside the bounds of the servlet spec when you talk about this,
but nothing stops
]
Subject: Re: Doubt in Single Sign On !!!
From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: Doubt in Single Sign On !!!
The reason for this design is security.
Consider a portal-type application like My Yahoo, which implements their
version
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Will Hartung wrote:
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 16:49:09 -0800
From: Will Hartung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Doubt in Single Sign On !!!
From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, shanmugampl wrote:
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 10:53:41 +0530
From: shanmugampl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Doubt in Single Sign On !!!
Will this be supported
Hi All,
I am using tomcat 4.1.18 and have enabled Single Sign On. I have
two contexts A and B and the files present inside the /jsp directories
of both the contexts are secured. In the global web.xml file i have my
session time out changed to 10 minutes.
With this setup, i login into
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, shanmugampl wrote:
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 14:13:57 +0530
From: shanmugampl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Doubt in Single Sign On !!!
Hi All,
I am using tomcat 4.1.18
in Single Sign On !!!
Hi All,
I am using tomcat 4.1.18 and have enabled Single Sign On. I have
two contexts A and B and the files present inside the /jsp directories
of both the contexts are secured. In the global web.xml file i have my
session time out changed to 10 minutes
Dear Sir/Madam,
We have received your e-mail and shall respond to you shortly.
Regards
ICICI Bank
NRI Services Centre
13 matches
Mail list logo
