[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 7:01 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Locked jar during Ant undeploy on Tomcat 5.5.3
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm experiencing a similar problem, I read the Tomcat docs and this thread
> first before submitting.
>
> In my
iling list. If I'm right, I
won't have to post this issue here anymore ...
Regards,
Q
> -Original Message-
> From: Quinten Verheyen
> Sent: 08 April 2005 15:40
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Locked jar during Ant undeploy on Tomcat 5.5.3
>
>
&
> There have been several locking issues resolved in later versions of
> Tomcat. (See http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.5-doc/changelog.html.)
>
> Does the problem exist on the current level (5.5.9)?
>
> - Chuck
Yes it does, the following is showing in the tomcat logs :
2005-04-08 15:
> From: Quinten Verheyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Locked jar during Ant undeploy on Tomcat 5.5.3
>
> could someone please help me with this ? It's really
> time-consuming and I'm making no progress.
There have been several locking issues resolved in
ontext.xml
I could use some assistance :-)
Regards,
Quinten
> -Original Message-
> From: Quinten Verheyen
> Sent: 31 March 2005 18:01
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Locked jar during Ant undeploy on Tomcat 5.5.3
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I&
ant to try this list first because I can
imagine this problem is common and goes beyond simple configuration errors ...
Kind regards,
Q
> -Original Message-
> From: Derek Mahar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 14 October 2004 20:15
> To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
>
I've just hit the same problem (with Tomcat 5.5.4).
antiJARLocking/antiResourceLocking didn't help. I tried to set 1 of
those attributes to context on appplication level (in meta-inf
directory) as well on global level (in context.xml in tomcat/conf
directory).
Does anyone know if there is a soluti
> > Thank you for pointing out these redundant attributes. I applied these
changes
> > to the context, but got the same results. If I have time, I'll put together
> > a small application that demonstrates the problem and send that to you.
>
> If the issue is real, then I think there will be som
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:29:00 + (UTC), Derek Mahar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Remy Maucherat gmail.com> writes:
>
> >
> > Some random stuff:
> >
> > Only use either antiJARLocking or antiResourceLocking. Never both.
> >
> > Also, on your Context element, remove debug, path, and docBase, whic
Remy Maucherat gmail.com> writes:
>
> Some random stuff:
>
> Only use either antiJARLocking or antiResourceLocking. Never both.
>
> Also, on your Context element, remove debug, path, and docBase, which
> are either gone, or are rundundant data.
>
Thank you for pointing out these redundant at
> The only thing I am willing to look at is a ready to run WAR.
I'd be happy to send it to you if it was mine to send, but it belongs to my
employer. Plus, the database connections would all fail.
Derek
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
Some random stuff:
Only use either antiJARLocking or antiResourceLocking. Never both.
Also, on your Context element, remove debug, path, and docBase, which
are either gone, or are rundundant data.
--
x
Rémy Maucherat
Developer & Consultant
JBoss Group (Europe) SàRL
x
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 14:54:52 + (UTC), Derek Mahar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Remy Maucherat gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 21:38:00 + (UTC), Derek Mahar penson.ca>
> wrote:
> > > Shapira, Yoav mpi.com> writes:
> > >
> > > I should mention that originally, I did not hav
Remy Maucherat gmail.com> writes:
>
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 21:38:00 + (UTC), Derek Mahar penson.ca>
wrote:
> > Shapira, Yoav mpi.com> writes:
> >
> > I should mention that originally, I did not have antiJARLocking enabled, but
> > enabling both antiJARLocking and antiResourceLocking does no
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 21:38:00 + (UTC), Derek Mahar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shapira, Yoav mpi.com> writes:
>
> I should mention that originally, I did not have antiJARLocking enabled, but
> enabling both antiJARLocking and antiResourceLocking does not appear to have
> made any difference.
Shapira, Yoav mpi.com> writes:
>
> Hola,
> Do you have the antiJARLocking attribute enabled for your Context? If
> not, does turning it on make a difference?
>
> Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com
I should mention that originally, I did not have antiJARLocking enabled, but
enabling both
> Hola,
> Do you have the antiJARLocking attribute enabled for your Context? If
> not, does turning it on make a difference?
>
I enabled both antiJARLocking and antiResourceLocking in META-INF/context.xml,
but Ant deploy (undeploy/deploy) still causes Tomcat to leave behind
WEB-INF/lib/taglibs-s
I assume you use deploy/undeploy. install/remove or undeploy/install will
lock files.
-Original Message-
From: Derek Mahar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October 13, 2004 4:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Locked jar during Ant undeploy on Tomcat 5.5.3
> Are you doing undep
> Are you doing undeploy or remove?
I'm using Ant to deploy an application that is already installed and running on
Tomcat. Ant first attempts to undeploy the application before it deploys it.
Ant reports that this is successful, but Tomcat leaves a few locked jars behind.
Yoav suggested that I
Are you doing undeploy or remove?
-Original Message-
From: Derek Mahar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October 13, 2004 3:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Locked jar during Ant undeploy on Tomcat 5.5.3
After executing several Ant undeploys, I've noticed that Tomcat 5.5.3 is
lo
4 3:20 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Locked jar during Ant undeploy on Tomcat 5.5.3
>
>After executing several Ant undeploys, I've noticed that Tomcat 5.5.3
is
>locking
>jar files in WEB-INF/lib, preventing complete application removal. Has
>anyone
>else encounte
After executing several Ant undeploys, I've noticed that Tomcat 5.5.3 is locking
jar files in WEB-INF/lib, preventing complete application removal. Has anyone
else encountered this behaviour?
I remember that in very early releases, Tomcat 5.0 exhibited similar behaviour,
but in later releases thi
22 matches
Mail list logo
