Thanks for the tip Lyndon. It took a few tries, but I finally got it right, I
think!
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--- Lyndon Tiu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 09:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
> tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org wrote:
> > I'm very new to tomcat and apache. I've set up
> apache
> > to forward to tomcat using mod_jk. It works fine
> on
> > the localhost, but if I try to connect through to
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 09:01:04 -0700 (PDT) tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org wrote:
> I'm very new to tomcat and apache. I've set up apache
> to forward to tomcat using mod_jk. It works fine on
> the localhost, but if I try to connect through to
> tomcat from any other host I get 404 file not found,
Nikola,
Thank you very much for you good comments. I agree that port based
servers are not common. The reason we use them is for separating
for example internal web sites and external public web sites.
Using host name based virtual hosting, you have to give a different
host name to each port.
Aria Bamdad wrote:
Hi, I asked this question yesterday and got no hints from anyone.
Since then, I have been able to accomplish what I want using multiple
instances of Tomcat. However, I would much rather use one instance
and serve requests on different Apache port.
Does anyone have ANY commen
Hi, I asked this question yesterday and got no hints from anyone.
Since then, I have been able to accomplish what I want using multiple
instances of Tomcat. However, I would much rather use one instance
and serve requests on different Apache port.
Does anyone have ANY comments regarding my issue
Darryl L. Miles wrote:
Do you have a line in Apache:
NameVirtualHost *:80
I dont think ServerName should have the port number after it. This and
ServerAlias are Host: header matching values.
Darryl,
yes I do.
However the ServerName directive I have been referring to in all msgs is
t
Do you have a line in Apache:
NameVirtualHost *:80
I dont think ServerName should have the port number after it. This and
ServerAlias are Host: header matching values.
I suspect your only remaining problem now is to get Apache and
Tomcat to see the same website document roots for the sam
Ok,
One step at a time. Thanks so far Darryl.
I now have it working across the internal network, but not externally.
The next step is what do I now need to do so that I can see the
jsp/servlets-examples pages externally??
Also, as I understand it, this format means that TC 5.5.9 will be the
Kyle wrote:
But I have not yet managed to get
www.host.domain.com/-examples/ to work
without returning a 500 Error.
First is it apache or tomcat that is returning the 500 ?
I'll leave the 500 question till I can be certain of the answer. I
thought it could only be Apache. Will however
Darryl,
thanks the reply.
Responses inline
Darryl L. Miles wrote:
Kyle wrote:
I have Apache serving multiple VHosts. I want to (eventually)
integrate different versions of Tomcat into different VHosts, but for
now, I'd settle for just 5.5.9 working with my default Apache VHost.
Apache wor
Kyle wrote:
I have Apache serving multiple VHosts. I want to (eventually)
integrate different versions of Tomcat into different VHosts, but for
now, I'd settle for just 5.5.9 working with my default Apache VHost.
Apache works dandy alone on :80.
Tomcat works just fine on :8080.
I have the js
Hi,
I've been following this thread for a bit and can offer some of my
painfully gained insights. I have Apache, tomcat 5.0.28, mod_jk and
SSL.
This is not a real fix, just my workarounds.
It drove me nuts forever until I figured out that Apache webserver does
not successful apply rewrite
It was something simple. I didn't have to mod_jk directive setup on the
virtual host with ssl.
Stanczak Group wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Stanczak Group wrote:
I'm not familiar with mod_jk, but in Tomcat when using SSL I can put
in a security constraint and it will redirect to a secure
co
Mladen Turk wrote:
Stanczak Group wrote:
I'm not familiar with mod_jk, but in Tomcat when using SSL I can put
in a security constraint and it will redirect to a secure connection,
so that's why I'm making it sound like a redirect.
Hmm.
You are still unclear.
Seems to me that you are sayi
test time
Stanczak Group wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Stanczak Group wrote:
I'm not familiar with mod_jk, but in Tomcat when using SSL I can put
in a security constraint and it will redirect to a secure
connection, so that's why I'm making it sound like a redirect.
Hmm.
You are still un
Mladen Turk wrote:
Stanczak Group wrote:
I'm not familiar with mod_jk, but in Tomcat when using SSL I can put
in a security constraint and it will redirect to a secure connection,
so that's why I'm making it sound like a redirect.
Hmm.
You are still unclear.
Seems to me that you are sayi
Stanczak Group wrote:
I'm not familiar with mod_jk, but in Tomcat when using SSL I can put in
a security constraint and it will redirect to a secure connection, so
that's why I'm making it sound like a redirect.
Hmm.
You are still unclear.
Seems to me that you are saying that you can access yo
I'm not familiar with mod_jk, but in Tomcat when using SSL I can put in
a security constraint and it will redirect to a secure connection, so
that's why I'm making it sound like a redirect. But the real issue is
when I access the url for example http://www.myapp.com/thisapp it works,
but when I
Stanczak Group wrote:
Well, maybe I've just make a mistake somewhere. I looked at my
jsp-examples/ url work with ssl and without in mod_jk. Where should I
look to see why this one works but my app doesn't?
Stanczak Group wrote:
I know this has been asked, but the all the emails and on-line do
Well, maybe I've just make a mistake somewhere. I looked at my
jsp-examples/ url work with ssl and without in mod_jk. Where should I
look to see why this one works but my app doesn't?
Stanczak Group wrote:
I know this has been asked, but the all the emails and on-line docs
don't seem to make
Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Apache + Tomcat with Mod_jk
> Shailendra Gatade wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am trying to connect Apache 2 ( Linux ) with Tomcat 5.0 ( Win2K )
> > using mod_jk. I'm facing several problems regarding t
riday, July 08, 2005 7:37 PM
To: Tomcat Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Apache + Tomcat with Mod_jk
Shailendra Gatade wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to connect Apache 2 ( Linux ) with Tomcat 5.0 ( Win2K ) using
> mod_jk. I'm facing several problems regarding this ...
>
> Shailendra Gatade wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am trying to connect Apache 2 ( Linux ) with Tomcat 5.0 ( Win2K )
> > using mod_jk. I'm facing several problems regarding this ...
> >
> > Initially i was using mod_jk2.so which is deprecated and also not
> > recomended for Production Environment.
>
Shailendra Gatade wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to connect Apache 2 ( Linux ) with Tomcat 5.0 ( Win2K ) using
> mod_jk. I'm facing several problems regarding this ...
>
> Initially i was using mod_jk2.so which is deprecated and also not recomended
> for Production Environment.
>
> I am not ab
Hi Shailendra,
What your Apache MPM are you using?
I think you should use JK_module that accord with Apcahe MPM.
Thanks,
-Toshio
> -Original Message-
> From: Shailendra Gatade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 11:25 PM
> To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
> Sub
Hi,
As you test, can you load a servlet through apache httpd? Such as
http://www.xyz.com/testservlet
You should make a simple servlet that just has the doGet method to test.
-Steve O.
> System: Solaris SunOS 5.9
> Apache: 2.0.52
> Tomcat: 4.1.31
> Mod JK: 1.2.6
> The problem: Apache/mod_jk c
Hi David:
An alternate to using mod_JK is to proxy http (or https) request to
the Tomcat from Apache.
i.e:
ProxyPass /path http://localhost:port/path
ProxyPassReverse /path http://localhost/path
There are valid reasons for using mod_JK - above just an alternate
suggestion if you can do without m
Darrell Bechtel wrote:
Both workers are setup to communicate to the localhost using port 8009??
Perhaps your /etc/hosts file has a entry that resolves the 'localhost'
to that IP address. Anyhow use 127.0.0.1 instead localhost to be sure.
Regards,
Mladen.
--
Both workers are setup to communicate to the localhost using port 8009??
Darrell
-Original Message-
From: David Short [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 9:11 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Apache Tomcat JK1.2 Connector
Look in the Ap
Look in the Apache2\conf\workers.properties file.
-Original Message-
From: Darrell Bechtel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 5:41 PM
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Apache Tomcat JK1.2 Connector
I have connected these 2 servers previously, but I am now ru
I have Tomcat 5.5.9 and Apache 2.0.54 running on Windows 2000,
connecting them with mod_jk (not jk2).
The only thing I want to do now is have Apache run Tomcat in-process
like I did with jk2, is this possible?
And if it is, what files do I need to update and configure?
Thanks.
Scenario two will be less hassle - unless you need a feature of Apache
HTTP Server.
If you plan to only use Apache HTTP Server as a listener for http
request - it will be better off with the Tomcat alone.
If, for any particular reason, you absolutely wish to use the Apache
HTTP server as the http
Yoo,
If you need PHP than standalone tomcat is not an option you want, to my opinion!
Greetings O.
On 5/11/05, Anoop kumar V <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We use tomcat standalone on production - most of our pages are dynamic (95%)
> and the user load is ~7000 and it has been behaving awesome - w
We use tomcat standalone on production - most of our pages are dynamic (95%)
and the user load is ~7000 and it has been behaving awesome - we use 4.1.31.
hth,
Anoop
On 5/11/05, Nikola Milutinovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Praveen KUMAR wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am little bit confuse
Praveen KUMAR wrote:
Hello,
I am little bit confuse in following decision:
Should be use
1- Apache (2.0.54) + Tomcat (5.0.28) in production with tomcat
listener (through Coyote connector) configured with mod_jk (1.2.12)
with apache
2- Or Standalone Tomcat (with their standard apache provided by t
> From: Praveen KUMAR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Apache+Tomcat
>
> What would be difference in both the scenarios in terms of
> performance and reliability?
Reliability: (very) generally, the fewer moving parts, the less chance
of problems.
Performance: only you can answer that quest
On 5/10/05, Praveen KUMAR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am little bit confuse in following decision:
>
> Should be use
>
> 1- Apache (2.0.54) + Tomcat (5.0.28) in production with tomcat listener
> (through Coyote connector) configured with mod_jk (1.2.12) with apache
> 2- Or Standalo
http://www.one0.com/html/downloads.php
Download the pdf ( nice ) / doc version Nice :o)
Guru
-Original Message-
From: anshul shrivastava [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 April 2005 18:08
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: apache + tomcat + JK connector configuration
Importance: High
new to Java; swithcing to Java! from PHP )
What is the username/password for http://localhost:8080/admin/
What is catalina, by the way ? ( h'ven't seen it in previous versions ).
- Original Message -
From: "Delphine Lê" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat
>
To: "Tomcat Users List"
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 11:11 PM
Subject: RE: apache + tomcat + JK connector configuration
> From: anshul shrivastava [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: apache + tomcat + JK connector configuration
>
> I'm using Tomcat Apache To
> From: anshul shrivastava [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: apache + tomcat + JK connector configuration
>
> I'm using Tomcat Apache Tomcat/5.0.16
Why such an old level? If you want to use the 5.0 branch, at least get
the current version. Better yet, use 5.5.
>
>
> > > port="6969" minProcessors="5" maxProcessors="75"
> > enableLookups="false" acceptCount="10" debug="0"/>
> >
> > Hope this helps...
> >
> > -Original Message-
> >
first message).
And also, I can see that it automatically creates a mod_jk.conf file in
$TOMCAT_HOME\conf\auto
Regards
-Original Message-
From: Robert Harrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vendredi 15 avril 2005 19:52
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: apache + tomcat + JK connector configur
bleLookups="false" acceptCount="10" debug="0"/>
> >
> > Hope this helps...
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Delphine Lê [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 6:41 PM
> > To: tomcat-u
69" minProcessors="5" maxProcessors="75"
> enableLookups="false" acceptCount="10" debug="0"/>
>
> Hope this helps...
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Delphine Lê [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> S
: Thursday, April 14, 2005 7:46 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Apache Tomcat & JK Mod
Is there an index.jsp in your context?
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Wiggs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 14, 2005 10:37 AM
To: 'Mladen Turk'
Cc: tomcat-user@jaka
Is there an index.jsp in your context?
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Wiggs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 14, 2005 10:37 AM
To: 'Mladen Turk'
Cc: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: RE: Apache Tomcat & JK Mod
I tried this, but I still get sent to the Tomc
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 10:11 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Apache Tomcat & JK Mod
Geoff Wiggs wrote:
> I know this question has probably been asked 1000 times, but here I go
> again.
>
OK. Once for all :)
RewriteEngine On
RewriteRule (.*) /servlets-examples$
JkMount /context/* worker1
JkMount /context worker1
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Wiggs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 13, 2005 8:16 PM
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Apache Tomcat & JK Mod
I know this question has probably been asked 1000 times, but here I go
again
41 PM
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: RE: apache + tomcat + JK connector configuration
thank you, but it's got them:
# Define 1 real worker using ajp13
worker.list=worker1
# Set properties for worker1 (ajp13)
worker.worker1.type=ajp13
worker.worker1.host=localhost
worker.worker1
Geoff Wiggs wrote:
I know this question has probably been asked 1000 times, but here I go
again.
OK. Once for all :)
RewriteEngine On
RewriteRule (.*) /servlets-examples$1 [PT]
I have Apache / Tomcat and jk_mod all running correctly. If I hit the URL
correctly (i.e. "www.server.com/context/") my
thank you, but it's got them:
# Define 1 real worker using ajp13
worker.list=worker1
# Set properties for worker1 (ajp13)
worker.worker1.type=ajp13
worker.worker1.host=localhost
worker.worker1.port=6969
worker.worker1.lbfactor=50
worker.worker1.cachesize=10
worker.worker1.cache_timeout=600
worker.
Post the workers.properties file. You probably need to include these lines in
that file:
worker.list=worker1
worker.worker1.port=6969
-Original Message-
From: Delphine Lê [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 2:01 PM
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: apac
On Apr 5, 2005 11:23 PM, david joffrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes,
>
> I'd like to set up the following set up the following URLs:
> >http://www.domain1.com/
> >http://www.domain2.com/
> >https://sthg.domain1.com/
> but this http://www.domain1.com/ must redirects to a tomcat instance and I
>
uld I configure my httpd.conf to realize that as so far if I
implement mod_jk on my https instance, all domains are redirected to the
tomcat instance.
Thanks.
DvJ
From: David Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: David Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: A
On Apr 5, 2005 4:17 AM, david joffrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I would like to run the following configurations with only one
> machine: 3 domains. Let's name them, www.domain1.com and
> sthg.domain2.com and www.domain2.com.
>
> www.domain1.com runs on 80 using apache and php
> www.domain2.
install tomcat 4.1.31 on your new server
Mendez, Eric wrote:
Hello,
I recently installed Apache/Tomcat v 4.1.18 on my new server, and I have a JSP page that
extracts values from an Oracle database, if the value in the database is an empty String
(""), it returns as a null value in my JSP page. I
I think the best way is to increase the maxProcessors and acceptCount to be the
same as the apache webserver. Check for the "MaxClients" entry in the
httpd.conf.
Sharon French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Under heavy loads the following errors
appear in the mod_jk.log:
[jk_ajp_common.c (68
k" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List"
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 8:43 PM
Subject: Re: apache + tomcat with 2 domains but same session?
> [I have a major sinus cold - so I might not be writing clearly ...]
>
> I don't think URL rewriting from ap
rack? or am i doing it totally wrong? or is there way to
get around this?
please help. thanks again.
Simon
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Funk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List"
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 7:44 PM
Subject: Re: apache + tomcat with 2 d
s.
Viorel Dragomir
.
..
---
- Original Message -
From: Rajaneesh
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 07:17
Subject: RE: apache + tomcat with 2 domains but same session?
Good point.
May be clustring helps! Have not used thi
Good point.
May be clustring helps! Have not used this concept.
Regards
Rajaneesh
-Original Message-
From: Simon Lau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 2:22 PM
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: apache + tomcat with 2 domains but same session?
Hi,
I
" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List"
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 7:44 PM
Subject: Re: apache + tomcat with 2 domains but same session?
> You can get away with this by using URL rewriting. When you are using
> aaa.abc.com and wish to redirect or link to bbb
are of problems.
Anyway, hope you get it solved.
Doug
- Original Message -
From: "Garret Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List"
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: Apache, Tomcat, WebDAV, and Web Folders... Oh, my!
Garret Wilson w
Garret Wilson wrote:
Apparently the whole PROPFIND / and Apache proxy things were red
herrings. The central issue seems to be that MS Web Folders doesn't know
what to do with a 401 Unauthorized response to an OPTIONS request on the
WebDAV root folder (when it finally gets around to checking). I
While I'm tracking down the domain authentication problem, here's
another problem to be aware of.
IE 5, Office 2000, and Office XP only support WebDAV BASIC
authentication, but not DIGEST:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;321932
You upgrade to Windows XP, and by default i
Here's new news:
Apparently the whole PROPFIND / and Apache proxy things were red
herrings. The central issue seems to be that MS Web Folders doesn't know
what to do with a 401 Unauthorized response to an OPTIONS request on the
WebDAV root folder (when it finally gets around to checking). I
rec
Garret Wilson wrote:
Why doesn't Microsoft Web Folders ask my for my password? Why does it
ignore the 401 Unauthorized and go back to asking for OPTIONS on the
root? Does this have something to do with using Apache to proxy to
Tomcat? Why did a non-proxied Tomcat work find on my Windows XP
Pro
gt;
To: "Tomcat Users List"
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 1:12 PM
Subject: Re: Apache, Tomcat, WebDAV, and Web Folders... Oh, my!
Yeah, that's what I *assume*, anyway. But Ethereal doesn't work on
localhost, so I can only assume. There are these possibilities:
* Tomcat re
Does anyone have an IIS box you can connect to to see what happens. Then
maybe you can mimic it.
Doug
- Original Message -
From: "Garret Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List"
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 1:12 PM
Subject: Re: Apache, Tomca
Yeah, that's what I *assume*, anyway. But Ethereal doesn't work on
localhost, so I can only assume. There are these possibilities:
* Tomcat returns something other than 501 Not Implemented when
configured on localhost. (Not likely.)
* MS Web Folders does different checks when accessing the
Int
>
> About the only thing left to try is to allow the PROPFIND on
> /webapp/ .
> So here's the Tomcat question---how can I allow a PROPFIND on
> /webapp/
> and return, for example, a 403 forbidden, rather than a 501 Not
> Implemented? Do I have to override
> org.apache.catalina.servlets.Defau
Uhh, that is what I was thinking.
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:17:00 +0200 (EET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Laba diena.
>
> DÄkojame, kad mums paraÅÄte.
>
> JÅsÅ atsiÅsta ÅinutÄ iÅsaugota mÅsÅ duomenÅ bazÄje.
>
> --
Laba diena.
Dėkojame, kad mums parašėte.
Jūsų atsiųsta žinutė išsaugota mūsų duomenų bazėje.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here's an update---I'm narrowing it down.
I tried to connect directly to Tomcat without Apache in-between. Same
problem. So this probably isn't something Apache is doing to mess up
communications.
I recompiled Apache so that I could add headers, and I added:
DAV: 1,2
MS-Author-Via: DAV
Allow: OP
I've also written a custom webdav servlet because we need to work with a
custom/virtualised file store. Our servlet works fine for everything
except some flavours of M$shite Windows - the symptoms I get are
identical to the ones you describe.
Like you our server is not running on localhost, and
You can get away with this by using URL rewriting. When you are using
aaa.abc.com and wish to redirect or link to bbb.abc.com - you would need to
rewrite the URL to include the jsessionid path parameter. But you *cannot* do
this via response.encodeURL(..) since that method will detect your URL is i
Some more info:
When Web Folders first tries to access
http://www.example.com/webapp/webdav/ , user agent
"Microsoft-WebDAV-MiniRedir/5.1.2600" tries to do a PROPFIND on
http://www.example.com/webapp . Apache (from Tomcat?) redirects with 302
to http://www.example.com/webapp/ .
"Microsoft-WebD
Parsons Technical Services wrote:
Why is MS Web Folders doing this strange OPTIONS thing with "/" and
ignoring my 401 Unauthorized HTTP response?
Did you close all IE windows prior to this last step? If not, then it
never destroyed the session.
I have now---same result. (Why would I care if it ha
Still using MS IE 6, I try to open http://www.example.com/webapp/webdav/
as a Web Folder using File|Open... (as Web Folder). IE reports that it is
unable to open the location as a Web Folder---would I like to see the
default view? If I answer in the affirmative, IE sends a GET and shows me
the
Parsons Technical Services wrote:
It may be that the login request is not getting back to you intact. Do
you have another app that is protected and triggers a login prompt?
Web Folders works without problems when Tomcat is running on localhost.
The password dialog pops up just fine.
I use Firefo
It may be that the login request is not getting back to you intact. Do you
have another app that is protected and triggers a login prompt? Like the
manager app. If not hit me off list and I will give you a URL to try.
If all else fails, would form auth over SSL work? Just a thought, yeah I
know
roger
there is step by step instruction
http://www.sitepoint.com/article/quick-start-guide-windows
HIH
vimal
- Original Message -
From: "Roger Mori-Tuesta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 5:19 AM
Subject: Apache & Tomcat integration
Dear Par
>Alot will depend on the configuration of the as/400 and the code you are
>using. What is the number of estimated concurrent users?
Thanks for yr inputs! We are looking at about 850-900 maximum concurrent users.
>>c) Are there any performance improvements that I can
>>expect if i upgrade to Tomc
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 08:28:37AM -0800, Vijay wrote:
: b) I believe the default configuration settings for
: Apache/Tomcat are usuallly appropriate for a
: medim-sized deployment. Is there any
: document/web-site/ list mail archive that can guide me
: on how to arrive at optimum configuration set
Comments below.
From: Vijay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Apache Tomcat production deployment: yr opinion reqd
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 08:28:37 -0800 (PST)
Hello everyone -
We would like to evaluate Apache/Tomcat as a
production-
Hi,
It's kind of funny how you spelled our the first four long words in the
subject, but then "yr" for your ;)
>a) Is Apache web server/Tomcat a proven production
>option for large-scale deployments (we are looking at
>about 1000 users served by a single instance of
>Apache/Tomcat3.x on an AS/400
-examples/*]
# Uri mapping for gridsphere
[uri:/gridsphere/*]
[uri:/vqwiki/*]
Yup
LoadModule jk2_module modules/mod_jk2.so
-Original Message-
From: Guillaume Alleon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 10, 2004 5:07 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Apache/Tomcat problem
Phillip Qin w
Yup
LoadModule jk2_module modules/mod_jk2.so
-Original Message-
From: Guillaume Alleon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 10, 2004 5:07 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Apache/Tomcat problem
Phillip Qin wrote:
>jk2_module is correct.
>
>Have you link the liba
Phillip Qin wrote:
jk2_module is correct.
Have you link the libapr-0.so.0?
What is your LoadModule in httpd.conf?
OK, you give me the hint, I had to put 'jk2_module' instead of 'mod_jk2'
in myLoadModule.
At least httpd starts, I may me back for configuration file problems.
Thanks
-Origina
jk2_module is correct.
Have you link the libapr-0.so.0?
What is your LoadModule in httpd.conf?
-Original Message-
From: Guillaume Alleon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 10, 2004 4:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Apache/Tomcat problem
Hi,
I have a Linux
Hi,
>the reason for running apache / jk2 is that we are running other things
>on the same server using php. Haven't tried to make php run inside
>tomcat, never even checked to see if it is possible. The php stuff
It's possible, but clunky. So you're fine for now, but when you're done
converting
Hi Shapira,
the reason for running apache / jk2 is that we are running other things
on the same server using php. Haven't tried to make php run inside
tomcat, never even checked to see if it is possible. The php stuff
existed before we started using tomcat so the natural approach for us
was to
Hi,
Why are you using Apache and JK2?
Using Tomcat standalone, most of the systems I've put in place run for
weeks and months without needing a restart. However, it takes good
design *and* support/maintenance practices (such as not reloading the
app in place every five minutes) to get there.
Yo
it within a day or so. What does JkMount
do, and is there any documentation anywhere on what elements are needed
where?
anw
-Original Message-
From: Alain Gaeremynck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 6:49 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Apache-Tomcat: File
Think of an empty jk2.properties.
-Original Message-
From: Allen Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October 27, 2004 7:20 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Apache, Tomcat and mod_jk2 - question about layout
Thanks so much. I'll try it today or tomorrow. Even thoug
Allen Williams wrote:
Second request:
Would you post what you did to integrate the two? I've followed all the
"clues" on both apache and tomcat websites, which is exactly what it says in
three books I've got, and I still get a "File Not Found" error from apache
when I go to the dynamic content.
Is
OTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 10:23 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: Apache, Tomcat and mod_jk2 - question about layout
>
>
> This is my workers2.properties (not workers.properties). You don't need to
> touch jk2.properties or httpd.c
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 18:07:51 -0300, Willian Corrêa
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sory my english is very poor, i'm brazilian... but...
> I'm using Apache with Tomcat under port 80 with mod JK to connect this
> servers. I have very much virtual hosts in my server. I need know how
> much, a part, use
1 - 100 of 869 matches
Mail list logo
