RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 & tomcat 5.0

2004-04-16 Thread Angus Mezick
The docs at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk2/configwebcom.htm l#How%20Load%20Balancing%20Works have been improved. Try reading them again. > -Original Message- > From: Thomas D. Zeimet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 10:17 AM > To: [EMAI

RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 & tomcat 5.0

2004-04-16 Thread Thomas D. Zeimet
homas D. Zeimet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 4:55 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 & tomcat 5.0 > > Does the shm play a role in this? I note that you have the following: > [shm] > info=Score

RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 & tomcat 5.0

2004-04-15 Thread Yang Xiao
e jkstatus page, kind of strange. Yang -Original Message- From: Thomas D. Zeimet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 4:55 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 & tomcat 5.0 Does the shm play a role in this? I note that you have

RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 & tomcat 5.0

2004-04-15 Thread Thomas D. Zeimet
cat Users List > Subject: RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 & tomcat 5.0 > > Thanks. The only change that you made to the tomcat server.xml conf file is > assigning your timcatid values to the jvmRoute property, correct? > > jvmRoute="psahammerhead"> >

RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 & tomcat 5.0

2004-04-15 Thread Yang Xiao
Yes. -Original Message- From: Thomas D. Zeimet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 9:42 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 & tomcat 5.0 Thanks. The only change that you made to the tomcat server.xml conf file is assig

RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 & tomcat 5.0

2004-04-15 Thread Thomas D. Zeimet
the Web server uri space > [uri:/jsp-examples/*] > info=JSP Examples > group=lb > > > [uri:/webtest/*] > info=Test JSP Page > group=lb > > [status:] > > -Original Message- > From: Thomas D. Zeimet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 15

RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 & tomcat 5.0

2004-04-15 Thread Yang Xiao
: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 & tomcat 5.0 Yes. I did a full stop and start of apache. There are no errors in the log files either. Do you, or anyone else, have a workers2.properties file of a working system that you are willing to share? I've gon

RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 & tomcat 5.0

2004-04-15 Thread Thomas D. Zeimet
alina.log files for errors. > Yang > > -Original Message- > From: Thomas D. Zeimet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 7:09 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 & tomcat 5.0 > > Thanks but it does

RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 & tomcat 5.0

2004-04-14 Thread Yang Xiao
PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 7:09 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 & tomcat 5.0 Thanks but it doesn't seem to make any difference. For each tomcat server I added sections like the following: [ajp13:psahammerhead:8009] channel=channel.s

RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 & tomcat 5.0

2004-04-14 Thread Thomas D. Zeimet
Thanks but it doesn't seem to make any difference. For each tomcat server I added sections like the following: [ajp13:psahammerhead:8009] channel=channel.socket:psahammerhead:8009 group=lb tomcatId=psahammerhead It still only wants to use one of the servers. There are other properties that coul

RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 & tomcat 5.0

2004-04-14 Thread Yang Xiao
Hi, I think you need to further define the workers with {ajp13:psahammerhead:8009] channel=channel.socket:psahammerhead:8009 group=lb ... etc hope this helps. Yang -Original Message- From: Thomas D. Zeimet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 10:17 AM To: [EMAIL

RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 & tomcat 5.0

2004-04-14 Thread Ralph Einfeldt
Some members of this list have reported that the load balancing is broken as the instances of mod_jk[2] don't know the load of each other. So mod_jk[2] will balance to some extend but not as good as it could/should. > -Original Message- > From: Thomas D. Zeimet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]