Re: Security question

2003-06-17 Thread Bill Barker
It can't be done (at least without hacking :). The servlet-spec only tells how to secure a page. There is no concept of un-securing a page. If you are using iPlanet+Tomcat, and the un-secure areas are all static content, then you can configure iPlanet to serve the un-secure areas (bypassing Tomc

RE: Security Question

2003-03-05 Thread mech
Only the communication between browser and apache server is ssl encrypted. Both the communications between apache and tomcat and tomcat and database are not. At least not without further action. So make sure that your server does not open the ajp13 connector (mod_jk or whatever) port and db server

Re: Security Question

2003-03-05 Thread Tim Funk
Here are the channels of communication. For a typical web page there are 3 socket connections that can be concurrently open. A: Web Browser --> Apache B: Apache --> Tomcat C: Tomcat --> Database Now onto the security ... A: If ssl then secure B: If ssl, then secure. If not ssl, then someone betwe

Re: Security question

2002-09-23 Thread Andreas Probst
Hi David, if it weren't Apache I would say: try HttpServletRequest.getUserPrincipal().getName(). Maybe it could be that this also works with Apache... Andreas > I'm trying to retrieve the userid that logged into apache and accessed > the current JSP page. How can I get this info? > > Expl

Re: Security question

2001-11-16 Thread Pritpal Dhaliwal
You could always use Referrer to see where the request is coming from. I am not sure if this would work if you used a dispatcher. Pritpal Dhaliwal - Original Message - From: "Laurent Michenaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:38 AM Subje

Re: Security question

2001-11-15 Thread Frank Lawlor
You can pass (possibly encrypted) information that only the two parties know. This is essentially authentication like your username/password. Frank Lawlor Athens Group, Inc. (512) 345-0600 x151 Athens Group, an employee-owned consulting firm integrating technology strategy and software solution

Re: Security Question

2001-10-26 Thread Frank Lawlor
I've started looking at some of the security issues but I'm still behind where you are in the area of your questions. Where did you find this document that has section 8 on "Existing Risks and Problems" Thanks, Frank Lawlor Athens Group, Inc. (512) 345-0600 x151 Athens Group, an employee-owne

Re: Security Question

2001-10-19 Thread Gerry Duhig
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 5:56 PM Subject: RE: Security Question > What is your debug level in the context? > > Darrell > > > -Original Message- > From: Gerry Duhig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, Oc

RE: Security Question

2001-10-19 Thread Darrell Porter
What is your debug level in the context? Darrell -Original Message- From: Gerry Duhig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fw: Security Question I am using Tomcat with JBoss and JBoss is handling security. Everything works fi

Re: Security question

2001-09-01 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Achim Baier wrote: > > Now my question: > Am I wrong-minded, is it bug or is it a jsp/servlet/j2ee-feature? Any > comments? > Security constraints that you mention in your web.xml deployment descriptor are *only* applied to the original request URI, *not* to any request UR

Re: security question

2001-04-06 Thread skolski
Hello Jeff, Hello List, thank you very much for your reply. A look at this example would have prevent me from spending a lot of time and writeing the other mail. The build in example doesn't work at my installation. That j_security_check stuff is missing. But that doesn't matter, I try to use bas

Re: security question

2001-04-05 Thread Jeff Turner
It's all defined in the servlet spec, downloadable from http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/index.html. Tomcat comes with a preconfigured example (examples/jsp/security) demonstrating this. --Jeff On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 09:49:38AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello everybody, > > the "p