I'm not a GC expert, so please note that the following
speculation is based upon memories of some GC document I
read a while back. I vaguely recall that GC performance
drops if the survivor space fills up while collecting the
young generation. I think the result is that what might
have been
PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 12:39 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: tomcat 3.3.1 takes a high time for Minor GC
I'm not a GC expert, so please note that the following
speculation is based upon memories
code inefficient enough to do this, but it
typically requires some effort to abuse garbage collection to this
degree.
Cheers,
Larry
-Original Message-
From: Akash Jauhar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 3:58 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: tomcat 3.3.1
Are you trying to run them both at the same time?
On Wednesday 18 February 2004 09:00 am, CLEMENT Eric wrote:
Hello,
I've just downloaded and installed both release of Tomcat.
In the same environment(ie 6, Win XP and jsdk 1.4), Tomcat 3.3.1 is
running, Tomcat 4.1.29 doesn't (Tomcat 5.0.18
Check your JAVA_HOME env variable,
and please tell us WHAT happens.
To have more information when starting tomcat,
change startup.bat to replace start by debug on line 41 :
(call %EXECUTABLE% debug %CMD_LINE_ARGS%)
when prompt, type run,
you should have more information...
-Message
I'm hoping you are either:
a) Not running them at the same time or
b) changing the port numbers they are listening on so they don't try
taking the same port numbers already being used by other running tomcat
services.
I suspect a collision of Tomcat's trying to grab the same ports. If
this
]
Envoyé : mercredi 18 février 2004 15:11
À : Tomcat Users List
Objet : Re: Tomcat 3.3.1 vs Tomcat 4.1.29
Are you trying to run them both at the same time?
On Wednesday 18 February 2004 09:00 am, CLEMENT Eric wrote:
Hello,
I've just downloaded and installed both release of Tomcat
Post error messages.
If you don't find any, post what you observe.
Just doesn't work is not enough.
There are so many potential problems (Packageless
classes, syntax error in *.xml, port conflicts) that
we can sit here and guess for hours.
-Original Message-
From: CLEMENT Eric
2004 15:16
À : Tomcat Users List
Objet : RE: Tomcat 3.3.1 vs Tomcat 4.1.29
Check your JAVA_HOME env variable,
and please tell us WHAT happens.
To have more information when starting tomcat,
change startup.bat to replace start by debug on line 41 :
(call %EXECUTABLE% debug %CMD_LINE_ARGS%)
when
That sounds as if there is jar file that contains an
outdated servlet api that doesn't contain
HttpServletRequest.removeAttribute()
-Original Message-
From: CLEMENT Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 3:45 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat
Sounds rigth. Any idea where I can get the good one?
Thanks
-Message d'origine-
De : Ralph Einfeldt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mercredi 18 février 2004 15:51
À : Tomcat Users List
Objet : RE: Tomcat 3.3.1 vs Tomcat 4.1.29
That sounds as if there is jar file that contains
: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 4:01 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3.1 vs Tomcat 4.1.29
Sounds rigth. Any idea where I can get the good one?
Thanks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
==
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:00:51 +0100
From: CLEMENT Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3.1 vs Tomcat 4.1.29
==
Sounds rigth. Any idea where I can get the good one?
Thanks
Check
Ralph Einfeldt wrote:
It should be contained in the tomcat distribution.
But the outdated one is found before the one that
is delivered with tomcat.
Search for servlet.jar, j2ee.jar on your machine.
(e.g. in JAVA_HOME/jre/lib/ext)
humm I suspect a malicious CLASSPATH mangling...
could you
]
Envoyé : mercredi 18 février 2004 15:11
À : Tomcat Users List
Objet : Re: Tomcat 3.3.1 vs Tomcat 4.1.29
Are you trying to run them both at the same time?
On Wednesday 18 February 2004 09:00 am, CLEMENT Eric wrote:
Hello,
I've just downloaded and installed both release of Tomcat
Almost. TOMCAT_HOME/lib/container did the trick.
Thanks again,
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 9:23 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3.1: AccessLogInterceptor doesn't log
PUT requests
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 10:08 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3.1: AccessLogInterceptor doesn't log
PUT requests
Almost. TOMCAT_HOME/lib/container did the trick.
Thanks again,
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Larry Isaacs
Sent: Tuesday
7:32 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3.1: AccessLogInterceptor doesn't log
PUT requests
You could implement your own interceptor and use one of the
hooks more suitable than beforeCommit(), perhaps
postReadRequest(), contextMap(), or postRequest().
I don't know
, Michael IZ/HZA-IE5 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 11:35 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3.1: AccessLogInterceptor doesn't log
PUT requests
Thanks, Larry. Not knowing any Java I managed to write (or
rather copy) something for postRequest. Seems
a certain request.
Thanks,
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Larry Isaacs
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 2:10 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3.1: AccessLogInterceptor doesn't log
PUT requests
AcessLogInterceptor writes the log entry using the
beforeCommit
much log output.
Larry
-Original Message-
From: Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IE5 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 6:40 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3.1: AccessLogInterceptor doesn't log
PUT requests
A long time ago I sent the attached
Is the javax/servlet/http/HttpSessionBindingListener supported by Tomcat 3.x?
If it showed up in a later version of the servlet specification, you might need to
upgrade your Tomcat.
Filip
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Lemberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04,
. That was one of the first things I asked :)
-Original Message-
From: Filip Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 3:00 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3.1 HttpSessionBindingListener not found
Is the javax/servlet/http/HttpSessionBindingListener
This means that the class that Class.ForName() is trying
to load has a dependency chain that includes a class
that has a dependency on HttpSessionBindingListener, i.e.
servlet.jar.
That class with the servlet.jar dependency is being found
in a classloader that is below (i.e. a parent,) of the
Yep, adding servlet.jar to the classpath did the trick! Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 3:14 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3.1 HttpSessionBindingListener not found
This means that the class
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 4:41 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3.1 HttpSessionBindingListener not found
Yep, adding servlet.jar to the classpath did the trick! Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
: RE: Tomcat 3.3.1 HttpSessionBindingListener not found
This confirms that the problem class is on your CLASSPATH.
However, putting servlet.jar on the CLASSPATH is not a
good solution.
Now servlet.jar can't see any classes in the
TOMCAT_HOME/lib/common classloader that it could
previously
: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 3:01 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3.1 HttpSessionBindingListener
not found
This confirms that the problem class is on your
CLASSPATH.
However, putting servlet.jar on the CLASSPATH is not
a
good solution.
Now servlet.jar can't see any
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 6:35 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3.1 HttpSessionBindingListener not found
HttpSessionBindingListener was introduced with Servlet
2.3. Tomcat 3.3 is based on Servlet 2.2. The
servlet.jar you added into your classpath must
.
Cheers,
Larry
-Original Message-
From: Carl Trusiak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 6:35 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3.1
HttpSessionBindingListener not found
HttpSessionBindingListener was introduced with
Servlet
2.3
I am able to run it as a service without problems. Be
sure the note found at:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3.1a/bin/win32/i386/
isn't what is keeping it from working.
For the mysterious shutdowns, you may want to try increasing
the log level to see if any clues
Do you have an environment variable set for CLASSPATH containing . ; %JAVA_HOME%\bin;
%CATALINA_HOME%\common\lib\servlet.jar ?
Schultz, Cecilia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I installed Tomcat 3.3.1 on win2k with IIS. Then I installed an a vendor's web app.
When I bring up the vendor's login
It seems I am missing some path somewhere. I copied a web app that does work in
another server (with another container, not tomcat) into the problem server.
I got a similar error when bringing up the default page:
Class javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet not found in class
: Schultz, Cecilia
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:45 AM
To: 'Tomcat users list (E-mail)'
Subject: RE: tomcat 3.3.1 - win2k iis
It seems I am missing some path somewhere. I copied a web app
that does work in another server (with another container, not
tomcat
)
=
what am I missing??
Thanks
Cecilia
-Original Message-
From: Schultz, Cecilia
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:45 AM
To: 'Tomcat users list (E-mail)'
Subject: RE: tomcat 3.3.1 - win2k iis
It seems I am missing some path somewhere. I copied a web app
that does
: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:45 AM
To: 'Tomcat users list (E-mail)'
Subject: RE: tomcat 3.3.1 - win2k iis
It seems I am missing some path somewhere. I copied a web app
that does work in another server (with another container, not
tomcat) into the problem server.
I got a similar error when
an older version of servlet.jar (or j2ee.jar) someplace like
%JAVA_HOME%\jre\lib\ext.
- Original Message -
From: Schultz, Cecilia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat users list (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:44 AM
Subject: RE: tomcat 3.3.1 - win2k iis
It seems I
There doesn't appear to be anything wrong with the XML below,
assuming the '-' at the beginning of some lines are *not* in the
actual file.
Check the log output of Tomcat to make sure no problems are being
reported at startup and when tomcat receives the browser request.
Cheers,
Larry
Should it be apps-BS.xml?
This is what I saw in the docs:
· Add a Context entry in the Tomcat apps.xml configuration file. This approach
is described briefly below, and allows you to position the document root of your web
application at some point other than the $TOMCAT_HOME/webapps/
Thanks, Larry and Paul. (Paul, I don't think I got your whole message,
it seemed to be truncated)
The '-' at the beginning or some lines are *not* in the actual file. I
run tomcat from a window so that I can have live debugging on my
development computer instead of running it as a
PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: Tomcat 3.3.1 Problem
Thanks, Larry and Paul. (Paul, I don't think I got your whole message,
it seemed to be truncated)
The '-' at the beginning or some lines are *not* in the actual file
Ok I got it working.. my mistake .. for some reason never had a lib
directory inside java1.4 directory . It had the tools.jar file in it. Now it
works just fine.
-Original Message-
From: Shankar Chelakarai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Tomcat
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Fenlason, Josh wrote:
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 11:22:03 -0500
From: Fenlason, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tomcat 3.3.1 vs Tomcat 4.0.x vs Tomcat 4.1.x
I'm investigating the different versions of
Thanks for the advice. I was reading the Tomcat 4.x release notes and the javac
memory leak concerns me because we use a lot of jsp pages. Is that not a problem in
Tomcat 3.3.1? I didn't see it mentioned, but maybe I just missed it.
Simple advice #3 -- if you need features defined in
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Fenlason, Josh wrote:
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 13:25:30 -0500
From: Fenlason, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3.1 vs Tomcat 4.0.x vs Tomcat 4.1.x
Thanks for the advice
Thanks a lot. I appriciate your help. Have a nice day.
,
Josh.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The property name is case sensitive. Thus,
maxThreads=256
will work, but
maxthreads=256
won't.
Cheers,
Larry
-Original Message-
From: Nagesh Nayudu [mailto:nagesh;supportsoft.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 9:52 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: tomcat
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Jason Koeninger wrote:
Has anyone seen sessions move between users running Tomcat 3.3.1?
I'm using Apache 1.3.26 connecting to Tomcat 3.3.1 with mod_jk using
the ajp12 protocol, and it sounds from user reports as if sessions
are moving between users. At first, I thought
I've been doing multi-threaded code for a long time, and while I'm not
going to say there's no way I made a mistake, I am going to say
that it's unlikely it's a threading issue. In this particular application, I
do session management in a single servlet, and all I do is log the user
on and
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Jason Koeninger wrote:
I've been doing multi-threaded code for a long time, and while I'm
not going to say there's no way I made a mistake, I am going to say
that it's unlikely it's a threading issue. In this particular
application, I do session management in a single
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002 15:02:59 -0500 (CDT), Milt Epstein wrote:
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Jason Koeninger wrote:
I did say could be -- it is the most obvious thing that comes to
mind.
It would be nice if it was just a bone-headed threading issue, but I'm
afraid I'm not seeing one. I was hoping I
Milt,
I posted earlier (9/12) about a problem that we ran into with
Apache/Tomcat having one user login and get another user's data. Look
for Killing Apache Processes Connected to Tomcat via mod_jk (Ajp13)
for a little background.
In the logs we found the error where USER1 called a jsp
I'm not going to claim that it's 100% safe, but 3.3.1 is mostly a bug-fix
release over 3.3a. However, AFAIK, no jars were added or removed between
the two so you are on pretty safe ground. I don't remember what changed in
Jasper (but you can check the release-notes to see), so if you are using
It would seem that the JSPs are being handled as static files
and not being handled by the JspInterceptor. I would recommend
doublechecking how you have configured your Tomcat and use log
output (set non-zero debug levels as needed) to see why it is
behaving the way it is.
Cheers,
Larry
Did you look at the code :
org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspWriterImpl
is the flushBuffer present?
Thomas
Eric Leung wrote:
Hi All,
I'm upgrading an application written for tomcat 3.1.1 to 3.3.1.
After fixing some bugs on using tomcat internal classes, I can startup the
application in 3.3.1
with the 3.3.1 binary and the servlet 2.2 spec says this
method flushBuffer is inside the class.
What else should I look for?
Thanks,
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Colin de Verdiere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 4:03 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 3.3.1
flushBuffer is inside the class.
What else should I look for?
Thanks,
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Colin de Verdiere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 4:03 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 3.3.1
Did you look at the code
I haven't actually seen a need for it at all except on an XP box. On those,
a value of 100 = x = 250 seems to work well (depending on the speed of
the network card).
This doesn't look like one of those cases. If the user hits the stop
button (or clicks on the x), then you are going to see a
As a Servlet 2.2/JSP 1.1 reference implementation, by
design, it would not be able to handle a 1.2 tag library.
You will need to still with 1.1.
Cheers,
Larry
-Original Message-
From: Laurent Michenaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:01 AM
To: [EMAIL
As an addendum - it's not just RH7.1 (or gcc2.96) I get the same on a
debian box.
Is there a working version of mod_jk for Apache 2.0.39 amd Tomcat 3.3.1
out there?
John Rowling
On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 14:45, John Rowling wrote:
This seems unnecessarily difficult. I have a system running a
AcessLogInterceptor writes the log entry using the
beforeCommit() hook. If no response is generated by
the request, then it appears that no log entry would be
created.
Cheers,
Larry
-Original Message-
From: Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IC1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July
: Re: Tomcat 3.3.1: how to deny access for certain IP
addresses?
hi mike,
one way of handling it is thro ur appln itself by using
request.getRemoteAddr() which returns the IP address of the client
requesting ur servlet
this can then be compared/patternmatched against a databse or any
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 5:39 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3.1: how to deny access for certain IP
addresses?
Thanks to ravi and Ralph for their fast replies. From that it
looks like what I want can't easily be done. I need it as a
protection
PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : lundi 10 juin 2002 19:53
À : 'Tomcat Users List'
Objet : RE: Tomcat 3.3.1/Apache Virtual Host and Alias
It looks like the only way for things not to be working
is if the www.test.net isn't being added as a host alias
on the Tomcat side. Try Alias .../ with a capital
Check the mod_jk log and make sure the www.test.net requests
are being forwarded to Tomcat. If so, set the debug level
on SimpleMapper1 in server.xml to 1 and examine the
Tomcat log to see how the www.test.net requests are being
handled differently from www.test.com requests. I currently
don't
-
De : Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : lundi 10 juin 2002 18:47
À : 'Tomcat Users List'
Objet : RE: Tomcat 3.3.1/Apache Virtual Host and Alias
Check the mod_jk log and make sure the www.test.net requests
are being forwarded to Tomcat. If so, set the debug level
: Laurent Michenaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:06 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3.1/Apache Virtual Host and Alias
Requesting www.test.net/index.jsp logs :
* In mod_jk.log :
[Mon Jun 10 18:51:00 2002] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (351
De: Pekník Jan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: 28 de mayo de 2002 15:49
jni_connect.dll.
What is purpose of this module ?
This is used when Tomcat 3.3.1 is started in process, this dll is used
for communications between tomcat and jk..
Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega
--
To
From: Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
After adding the jdom.jar and making the server.xml changes
you describe, I find that I can compile and display the
following JSP page:
Hrmm, ok well I am going to rip everything off the system and try again.
Perhaps something has been convoluted to
unless special programming is implemented to make it possible,
such as using the thread context classloader.
Cheers,
Larry
-Original Message-
From: Mario Felarca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3.1
: Saturday, May 18, 2002 12:23 PM
To: TomcatUser
Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3.1 and additionalJars
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 12:30:33 -0400
Both of those should work. There could be some
classloader issue involved. Can you provide a test
case of what you are trying to do?
Cheers,
Larry
From: Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's basically correct. The jar is added to the
web application's classloader classpath. The web
application's classloader is switched in as the context
class during request handling for that context.
Larry
Ok, I just wanted to make sure of
the jar in the WEB-INF/lib of all
web applications. It offers the same visibility.
Cheers,
Larry
-Original Message-
From: Mario Felarca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 12:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3.1 and additionalJars
From: Larry
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 12:30:33 -0400
Both of those should work. There could be some
classloader issue involved. Can you provide a test
case of what you are trying to do?
Cheers,
Larry
So the base case I am trying is simply allowing access
to the jdom.jar from my webapps. This is to simply
From: Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 14:09:12 -0400
What did you set the additionalJars attribute to and
where did you put the jdom.jar?
Larry
The additionalJars attribute I tried setting to a
couple of different things. One was an absolute path
with the jdom.jar
: Tomcat 3.3.1 and additionalJars
From: Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 14:09:12 -0400
What did you set the additionalJars attribute to and
where did you put the jdom.jar?
Larry
The additionalJars attribute I tried setting to a
couple of different things. One
This was originally added as a way to add jasper.jar
to each web application so it could be used with
extensions other than .jsp. It worked for me at the
time. What exactly is the problem you are experiencing.
Cheers,
Larry
-Original Message-
From: Mario Felarca [mailto:[EMAIL
From: Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This was originally added as a way to add jasper.jar
to each web application so it could be used with
extensions other than .jsp. It worked for me at the
time. What exactly is the problem you are experiencing.
Cheers,
Larry
Hey,
I am just trying
What did you set the additionalJars attribute to and
where did you put the jdom.jar?
Larry
-Original Message-
From: Mario Felarca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 2:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3.1 and additionalJars configuration
Yep. i'm using it. actually, i'm using tomcat 4.0.2 with JDK 1.4, and it's working
fine.
-Original Message-
From: Michel COTE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: sexta-feira, 12 de Abril de 2002 11:39
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Tomcat 3.3.1 and JDK 1.4
What do you think about using
4.04b2 JDK 1.4 works very well. Using it on XP and R.H. Linux 7.2
No reason 3.3.1 wouldn't work also.
Ken
Carlos Martins wrote:
Yep. i'm using it. actually, i'm using tomcat 4.0.2 with JDK 1.4, and it's working
fine.
-Original Message-
From: Michel COTE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
You probably have the tags in the web.xml (context salon) in an incorrect
order. Post the web.xml file here. Some might point out the correct order.
RS
Emmanuel Guyot [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 04/06/2002 06:29:03 AM
Please respond to Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Liste tomcat-user
That's right. The order is important : I had to put the servlet tags then the
servlet-mapping tags and now it works fine.
Thanks.
E.G.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 7:01 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat 3.3.1
83 matches
Mail list logo
