s good if you do not need to handle that much load.
-joe
- Original Message -
From: "Shapira, Yoav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 15:31:37 -0400
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Tomcat 4.1.x Vs 5.0.x
>
> Hi,
>
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
Sun 1.4.2
IBM 1.4.1
Bea 1.4.2 (JRockit)
Which one would be better?
I am running RH Enterprise Linux 3 on a Dell PowerEdge 1655MC: dual
1.4Ghz PIII and 2GB of RAM.
The reason people cite for shifting away from the Sun JVM are
performance-oriented. The problems cited wi
Hi,
>Sun 1.4.2
>IBM 1.4.1
>Bea 1.4.2 (JRockit)
>
>Which one would be better?
>I am running RH Enterprise Linux 3 on a Dell PowerEdge 1655MC: dual
>1.4Ghz PIII and 2GB of RAM.
The reason people cite for shifting away from the Sun JVM are
performance-oriented. The problems cited with others often
On 12-05-2004 20:14, Shapira, Yoav wrote:
The tomcat 5.0.x versions are faster and at least as stable.
Ok, I am going to install Tomcat 5.0.24.
Again, the latest stable version is what you want. We have people using
Sun, IBM, Blackdown, and JRockit on this list.
I can choose between the followin
Hi,
>Is it better to use Tomcat 4.1.x or 5.0.x for such scenario?
>Which version is faster and stabler?
The tomcat 5.0.x versions are faster and at least as stable.
>Will applications designed for Tomcat 4 work fine with version 5?
Applications designed for the Servlet Specification will work
On 4/17/04 4:36 PM, wsedio wrote:
Hi,
I've a web hosting server running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 ES and I am
planning to install Tomcat on it.
I would like to give dedicated Tomcat instances to some clients and to
keep a shared instance for smaller web sites.
Is it better to use Tomcat 4.1.x
