uction issues. I would't go
directly to the servers and change as I like.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 8:32 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat heap vs. java.exe
Hello,
> If I were you, I'd
Hello,
If I were you, I'd load test your site first before going to production. As
you pointed out, you cannot afford to stop your production server or hang
it with OutOfMemory errors.
This is good advice. Load testing is generally easy to do in
development, and hard to recover from if you don't
Asim,
kill doesn't work on Windows. Besides, I can't afford to stop the
server right now. Many of our customers are using currently using the
websites.
In order to get a thread-dump, you can do a CRTL-BREAK (not CTRL-C) on
win32. Unfortunately, you have to already have started the JVM on a
c
cc:
02/27/2004 04:31 PM Subject: Re: Tomcat heap vs.
java.exe
Please respond to
t;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> tric.com To: "Tomcat
Users
> List"
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 02/27/2004 04:26 cc:
>
cat Users
List"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
02/27/2004 04:26 cc:
PM Subject: Re: Tomcat
heap vs. java.exe
Please respond to
PM Subject: Re: Tomcat heap vs. java.exe
Please respond to
cc:
02/27/2004 04:21 PM Subject: Re: Tomcat heap vs.
java.exe
Please respond to
ers List"
tworks.net>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
02/27/2004 04:14 PM Subject: Re:
Tomcat heap vs. java.exe
Please respond to
ers List"
tworks.net> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
02/27/2004 04:14 PM Subject: Re: Tom
Our sites have just went down for a couple of minutes. I solved the
problem by restarting Tomcat. At the time of the crash, java.exe was
about 345MB. I'm running tomcat with the -Xms128m -Xmx256m options.
Our server has 1GB physical ram.
On the Tomcat logs, it reads:
2004-02-27 16:58:55 Ap
Yes, it goes along with subject called Garbage collection and tuning. This
area is a huge, sometimes very quick to tune, and sometimes gives a
nightmare to tune those properties. The nature of this subject grows based
on your application, servers and expectations from user end.
-Original Mess
Hi,
>the performance very much. Do you think it makes sense to assume that
>java.exe won't exceed 370 MB (400 MB top) under these conditions?
Yes.
Yoav Shapira
This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and
may contain information that is confidential
My main concern is to make sure that there is no memory leakage of any
sort. Our server has 1GB of ram. I'm running tomcat with -Xms128m
-Xmx256m. In this case, I'm guessing that java.exe will eventually
become 256MB + JVM memory ~= 370MB and stay stabilized like that. I
don't want our serv
Howdy,
Search the archives, as the relationship of the heap size to the total
java OS process size has been described numerous times. What you're
seeing is normal.
Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics
>-Original Message-
>From: Asim Alp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, Febru
15 matches
Mail list logo
