, January 20, 2004 2:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: maxProcessors vs maxThreads
Oh, come on, get real :). The Jk-Coyote docs are probably second to the
mod_jk2 docs for being the most incomplete. While (as Remy has stated),
you
can perfectly happily set
I'd go with 'or'. In the TC 3.x line, the HTTP Connector really s*cked
(except that with the TC 3.3.2-dev nightly, you have the option of using the
same CoyoteConnector as TC 4.1.x-5.0.x :). Unless you *need* the features of
e.g. mod_rewrite, mod_php, I'd agree with Yoav, and you should use
Oh, come on, get real :). The Jk-Coyote docs are probably second to the
mod_jk2 docs for being the most incomplete. While (as Remy has stated), you
can perfectly happily set this on the Connector, the jk2.properties syntax
is:
container.maxThreads=value
Shapira, Yoav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Howdy,
Oh, come on, get real :). The Jk-Coyote docs are probably second to
the
mod_jk2 docs for being the most incomplete.
We should probably do something about that, then ;) I've paid much more
attention to the tomcat (core) docs rather than the connector-related
stuff, naturally, as I don't
the connectors, is that because there is
something better to use?
ADC
-Original Message-
From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 January 2004 13:57
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: maxProcessors vs maxThreads
Howdy,
Oh, come on, get real :). The Jk-Coyote docs are probably
Is there a similar setting for jk2 under 4.1.29?
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Barker
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 2:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: maxProcessors vs maxThreads
Oh, come on, get real :). The Jk-Coyote docs
Howdy,
You seem to know what you are talking about and it amuses me everyday
you
come on at the same sort of time and bang off all the answers :)
(although
regrettably I was hoping you would answer my Tomcat and Clusters one
yesterday).
I work normal hours, roughly 8:30-4:30 at my day job, US
: maxProcessors vs maxThreads
Hi Yoav,
Anyways, if someone like you is not using the connectors, is
that because there is something better to use?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
: maxProcessors vs maxThreads
Howdy,
You seem to know what you are talking about and it amuses me everyday
you
come on at the same sort of time and bang off all the answers :)
(although
regrettably I was hoping you would answer my Tomcat and Clusters one
yesterday).
I work normal hours, roughly 8:30-4:30
Howdy,
Hm, we have setup IIS in front of Tomcat so it can serve off the static
content, I thought that was the conventional wisdom.
Conventional and/or outdated. Or is the more likely operator in the
previous sentence.
We're looking at about 300+ users of which maybe lets say 20 concurrent
at
Thanks Yoav.
-Original Message-
From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 January 2004 16:12
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: maxProcessors vs maxThreads
Howdy,
Hm, we have setup IIS in front of Tomcat so it can serve off the static
content, I thought
Howdy,
there seems to be some confusion about whether to use maxThreads or
maxProcessors and the effect on tomcat. futher it is not clear from the
docs which one to use and whether they have an effect on the protocol
used
by the connector.
Read the documentation carefully. The Coyote (HTTP)
thanks yoav, i noticed that but then does that mean that there is no
method to specify max threads/processors for the coyote ajp connector?
that sounds a bit strange
how does tomcat behave with the ajp connector? does it indefinitely spawn
threads to handle requests until it bombs out of
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Howdy,
there seems to be some confusion about whether to use maxThreads or
maxProcessors and the effect on tomcat. futher it is not clear from the
docs which one to use and whether they have an effect on the protocol
used
by the connector.
Read the documentation
Howdy,
thanks yoav, i noticed that but then does that mean that there is no
method to specify max threads/processors for the coyote ajp connector?
that sounds a bit strange
If it's not documented, then there's no configurable way to do it. Of
course, you can always subclass/extend a
thanks yoav.
this begs another question... under what circumstances would one choose to
use the ajp connector? i am assuming it's probably a more compact and
efficient protocol compared to http (not sure about that).
in any case, if one never needs to access tomcat directly from a browser
On Mon, January 19, 2004 at 1:47 pm, Apu Shah wrote:
this begs another question... under what circumstances would one choose to
use the ajp connector? i am assuming it's probably a more compact and
efficient protocol compared to http (not sure about that).
The AJP protocol is designed to be
Apu Shah wrote:
thanks yoav.
this begs another question... under what circumstances would
one choose to use the ajp connector? i am assuming it's
probably a more compact and efficient protocol compared to
http (not sure about that).
in any case, if one never needs to access tomcat
thanks much remy. i was looking for configuring maxThreads for the ajp
connector with jk2.
anyways, do you know what the default value for maxThreads is for
channelSocket? (it's not in the docs)
what are the defaults for the other options? or where can i find them?
backLog
tcpNoDelay
19 matches
Mail list logo
