Re: installing a servlet

2003-06-24 Thread John Turner
Donwgrading and using mod_webapp is the WORST thing you could do, for all sorts of reasons. Security, for one. Performance, for another. Future extensibility and growth, for another. Mod_jk and mod_jk2 work. This is a fact. There's nothing anyone can do if you want to give up learning how

RE: installing a servlet

2003-06-24 Thread Kevin Passey
grateful to many people in this list. Good luck - don't go backwards, go forwards... Kevin -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 June 2003 13:42 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: installing a servlet Donwgrading and using mod_webapp is the WORST

Re: installing a servlet

2003-06-24 Thread Stephen Carville
If people are having problems getting mod_jk to work there are probably reasons. It may be true that mod_jk works but not always as expected. I have a system that works fine until mod_jk gets involved then java starts barfing up 'exceptions' on a couple of jsp's. Naturally the developers

Re: installing a servlet

2003-06-24 Thread Tony Grant
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 14:42, John Turner wrote: Donwgrading and using mod_webapp is the WORST thing you could do, for all sorts of reasons. Security, for one. Performance, for another. Future extensibility and growth, for another. My question was: downgrade to mod_jk? (I have read that

RE: installing a servlet

2003-06-24 Thread Atreya Basu
: Tony Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: June 24, 2003 10:02 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: installing a servlet On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 14:42, John Turner wrote: Donwgrading and using mod_webapp is the WORST thing you could do, for all sorts of reasons. Security, for one. Performance

RE: installing a servlet

2003-06-24 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Howdy, There seems to be a great deal of discussion about JK2. I know that JK2 is the outstanding issue for me in getting Tomcat running. Maybe it JK2 is not required to get tomcat running. It's one option that you can use if you want to connect Apache to tomcat. Yoav Shapira This

RE: installing a servlet

2003-06-24 Thread Atreya Basu
:25 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: installing a servlet Howdy, There seems to be a great deal of discussion about JK2. I know that JK2 is the outstanding issue for me in getting Tomcat running. Maybe it JK2 is not required to get tomcat running. It's one option that you can use if you

Re: installing a servlet

2003-06-24 Thread Tim Funk
This is also on my wish list for docs. To have many many examples, for example: jk (worker.properties http.conf) - Simple - With advanced options - With multiple workers (one host) - With multiple workers loadbalancer (one host) - With multiple workers mulitple loadbalancers (one host) - All

Re: installing a servlet

2003-06-24 Thread John Turner
Sorry, it wasn't my intent to criticize anyone, I apologize if that was the way it came across. JK and JK2 work. The difference that you have encountered moving to 4.1.24 is most likely attributable to the Invoker servlet being disabled by default. It is disabled by default for a reason:

RE: installing a servlet

2003-06-24 Thread Phillip Qin
Mostly agree with John. But I love jk2 because it is simple to config. -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: June 24, 2003 9:37 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: installing a servlet Sorry, it wasn't my intent to criticize anyone, I apologize

RE: installing a servlet

2003-06-24 Thread Shapira, Yoav
To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: installing a servlet Sorry, it wasn't my intent to criticize anyone, I apologize if that was the way it came across. JK and JK2 work. The difference that you have encountered moving to 4.1.24 is most likely attributable to the Invoker servlet being disabled by default

Re: installing a servlet

2003-06-24 Thread Tony Grant
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 15:37, John Turner wrote: Sorry, it wasn't my intent to criticize anyone, I apologize if that was the way it came across. That's OK - I am slow at re-integrating newbie mode... - the actual URL you are typing into the browser's address bar (or the value of your Form's

Re: installing a servlet

2003-06-23 Thread Tony Grant
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 14:33, John Turner wrote: Please post: - workers2.properties # Define the communication channel [shm] file=/var/log/shm.file size=1048576 # Example socket channel, override port and host. [channel.socket:localhost:8009] port=8009 host=127.0.0.1 # define the worker

Re: installing a servlet

2003-06-23 Thread John Turner
There's no URL mapping in workers2.properties that would send your servlet request to Tomcat. The only requests for www.tgds.net that will ever get to Tomcat are those URLs that end in *.jsp because of this mapping: [uri:www.tgds.net/*.jsp] If you want to map another URI, such as

Re: installing a servlet

2003-06-23 Thread Tony Grant
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 14:49, John Turner wrote: thanks for your kind patience John! Reading through the FAQs this seems to be a common problem and others seem to have fixed it much more easily... There's no URL mapping in workers2.properties that would send your servlet request to Tomcat.

Re: installing a servlet

2003-06-23 Thread Flo
ok i forgotten to tell i tried it but i get an error liket that : BIND_error Adress in use - Original Message - From: John Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 8:10 PM Subject: Re: installing a servlet No problem, glad I

Re: installing a servlet

2003-06-23 Thread Tony Grant
From my work of yesterday it seems that the easiest way to get a servlet to run is to downgrade to Tomcat 4.0.x and use mod_webapp... This isn't a very encouraging experience. Cheers Tony Grant -- www.tgds.net Library management software toolkit, redhat linux on Sony Vaio C1XD, Dreamweaver MX

Re: installing a servlet

2003-06-20 Thread John Turner
Please post: - JkMount statements from Apache's httpd.conf (or other file if they are included into httd.conf) - workers.properties - relevant Host section from server.xml - relevant Context section from server.xml - servlet and servlet-mapping tags for this servlet from web.xml John On 20 Jun