Re: Confusion Land

2005-06-03 Thread Tim Diggins
M To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Confusion Land Unless I misunderstood, RaidDB.class should be located in directory WEB-INF/classes/com/polliard/db and not WEB-INF/classes/com/polliard/db/RaidDB. Thomas Polliard wrote: So I am running Tomcat 5.5.9 I have a jsp page that im

Re: Confusion Land

2005-06-03 Thread Mark Thomas
Thomas Polliard wrote: So I am running Tomcat 5.5.9 I have a jsp page that imports com.polliard.db.RaidDB; It also has a line that invokes a new instance of this class RaidDB rdb = new RaidDB(); The code works on Jetty but when used with Tomcat I am getting the error RaidDB cannot be resolved or

RE: Confusion Land

2005-06-03 Thread Thomas Polliard
./images ./images/space.gif ./raid.css ./header.jsp -- Thomas Polliard Sr. Systems Administrator, AOL [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Thomas Polliard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 2:55 PM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Confusion Land It

RE: Confusion Land

2005-06-03 Thread Thomas Polliard
, June 03, 2005 2:52 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Confusion Land Unless I misunderstood, RaidDB.class should be located in directory WEB-INF/classes/com/polliard/db and not WEB-INF/classes/com/polliard/db/RaidDB. Thomas Polliard wrote: >So I am running Tomcat 5.5.9 >I have a jsp pag

Re: Confusion Land

2005-06-03 Thread Scott Dudley
Unless I misunderstood, RaidDB.class should be located in directory WEB-INF/classes/com/polliard/db and not WEB-INF/classes/com/polliard/db/RaidDB. Thomas Polliard wrote: So I am running Tomcat 5.5.9 I have a jsp page that imports com.polliard.db.RaidDB; It also has a line that invokes a ne

Confusion Land

2005-06-03 Thread Thomas Polliard
So I am running Tomcat 5.5.9 I have a jsp page that imports com.polliard.db.RaidDB; It also has a line that invokes a new instance of this class RaidDB rdb = new RaidDB(); The code works on Jetty but when used with Tomcat I am getting the error RaidDB cannot be resolved or is not a type. Any Id

Re: confusion to DBCP

2005-05-08 Thread Gurumoorthy
: "li yanjing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2005 5:18 AM Subject: confusion to DBCP I'm using mysql + tomcat as server to run jsp pages. and there are JavaBeans too. I have read a lot on the web that using a connection pool is very good. I just wondering why I

confusion to DBCP

2005-05-07 Thread li yanjing
I'm using mysql + tomcat as server to run jsp pages. and there are JavaBeans too. I have read a lot on the web that using a connection pool is very good. I just wondering why I should configure DBCP in tomcat? i think if i write the database connection in jsp pages(not in beans) I need configure DB

mod_access module with the allow directive confusion

2005-04-13 Thread Jay Hulslander
I would like to limit access to a directory path that I have in tomcat by domain. I believe I can use the mod_access module with the allow directive to do this. I found information about the directive at http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/mod_access.html#allow but I am still slightly confused.

Re: connection pooling confusion help needed

2005-03-29 Thread Preeti Iyer
Hi, Please follow the directions by user rmorriso on the following link. It should work fine. http://forums.devshed.com/archive/t-120081 On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 19:11:15 + (GMT), Krishnakant Mane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hello all, > im going to put a web application in java servlets > with

active and idle connection pooling confusion!

2005-03-27 Thread Krishnakant Mane
hello, I have been going through the connection pooling docs in the tomcat 5 documentation. and fortunately I found out the sample for mysql jdbc. now there is a confusion. I want to know what is the difference between max active and max idle connections. I mean what is the concept behind these

RE: connection pooling confusion help needed

2005-03-25 Thread pandu yelamanchili
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: connection pooling confusion help needed Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 19:11:15 + (GMT) hello all, im going to put a web application in java servlets with tomcat 5 on a production ready server for real time use. I am thinking of using connection pooling but I am a bit c

connection pooling confusion help needed

2005-03-25 Thread Krishnakant Mane
hello all, im going to put a web application in java servlets with tomcat 5 on a production ready server for real time use. I am thinking of using connection pooling but I am a bit confused. I have initialised all my connections in the servlet's init method and closed them in distroy method. so th

Re: webapp context confusion

2005-01-05 Thread QM
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 08:35:34AM -0500, Mark Claassen wrote: : I am currently using Tomcat5 and I : want to my servlet to process all .jar and .jnlp files. : [snip] : My problem is that I want this to process all files, not just those in : MySerlvet/ : [snip] : How can I bundle this up as a web

webapp context confusion

2005-01-05 Thread Mark Claassen
I have been using Tomcat for quite some time now, and am still a bit shakey on some of the configuration details. I am currently using Tomcat5 and I want to my servlet to process all .jar and .jnlp files. I have my servlet mapping set up in the web.xml: MyServlet

T5.x/JDK 1.4 comat: Confusion about versions of JMX in there

2004-12-31 Thread T K
1) The T5.0 changelog claims: "Replace MX4J 1.1.1 with the Sun JMX 1.2 RI (remm)" 2) The JDK 1.4.2 compat zip contains a jmx.jar; that apparently contains mx4j - what version? 3) So is it mx4j or SUN JMX 1.2 RI or both? Why this mess? /sk __ D

Re: Setting cookie confusion

2004-06-28 Thread Robert Bateman
Apologies for asking the original question. It appears the code works as expected - AFTER I restarted the server :( On Monday 28 June 2004 01:32 pm, Robert Bateman wrote: > I'm attempting to set a cookie in a servlet within my webapp and am running > into a problem > > Inside the servlet, I

Setting cookie confusion

2004-06-28 Thread Robert Bateman
I'm attempting to set a cookie in a servlet within my webapp and am running into a problem Inside the servlet, I create a cookie and add it to response. I then set context and write HTML to the user. The html does a forward to another page where I read all cookies. As far as I can tell,

RE: TC V4.1.29 Coyote Connector / minProcessors maxProcessors / Confusion

2004-03-26 Thread Shapira, Yoav
TED] >Subject: Re: TC V4.1.29 Coyote Connector / minProcessors maxProcessors / >Confusion > >> The second observation: two requests to the same servlet always >> handled serially. Tomcat normally creates one instance of a servlet >> for every declaration in web.xml. The e

Re: TC V4.1.29 Coyote Connector / minProcessors maxProcessors / Confusion

2004-03-26 Thread jblayer
The second observation: two requests to the same servlet always handled serially. Tomcat normally creates one instance of a servlet for every declaration in web.xml. The exception is SingleThreadModel (deprecated, don't use this) servlets. There's no provision in tomcat to create more instanc

Re: TC V4.1.29 Coyote Connector / minProcessors maxProcessors / Confusion

2004-03-26 Thread jblayer
Shapira, Yoav writes: I think your testing, servlets, configuration is all fine. The maxProcessors-1 observation is something I've noticed in the past, but as you say I don't think many people care because they deal with ~75 maxProcessors (the default value). Thanks - glad to know I'm not off in

RE: TC V4.1.29 Coyote Connector / minProcessors maxProcessors / Confusion

2004-03-25 Thread Shapira, Yoav
search Informatics >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 1:56 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: TC V4.1.29 Coyote Connector / minProcessors maxProcessors / >Confusion > >Yoav, > >Thanks for

RE: TC V4.1.29 Coyote Connector / minProcessors maxProcessors / Confusion

2004-03-25 Thread jblayer
Yoav, Thanks for the quick reply... Create a servlet that takes a long time to process, so you can easily observe the connections. Then make sure you make two concurrent requests to that servlet, and that the servlet's HTML output doesn't contain images, CSS references, or any other entities w

RE: TC V4.1.29 Coyote Connector / minProcessors maxProcessors / Confusion

2004-03-25 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, >This suggested to me that with minProcessors="1" and >maxProcessors="2", the server would allow 2 concurrent connections. Yup. >Seems maximum_concurrent_connections=(maxProcessors - minProcessors), >a slightly different relationship than I gathered from the docs. > >I was hoping someone co

TC V4.1.29 Coyote Connector / minProcessors maxProcessors / Confusion

2004-03-24 Thread jblayer
I'm a little confused regarding TC V4.1.29 Coyote HTTP/1.1 Connector attributes minProcessors and maxProcessors. Server config docs state minProcessors == number of connection threads to start initially and maxProcessors == the maximum number of connection threads that the server will create. Thi

Re: Confusion about Realm directive

2003-11-28 Thread Tim Funk
Inside. -Tim Atreya Basu wrote: Hi all, I am trying to create a security realm. I am confused as to where to put the Realm directive. If I want to create a realm for a Context, would I place the directive before or inside of the Context directive? Thanks in advance.

Confusion about Realm directive

2003-11-28 Thread Atreya Basu
Hi all, I am trying to create a security realm. I am confused as to where to put the Realm directive. If I want to create a realm for a Context, would I place the directive before or inside of the Context directive? Thanks in advance. -- _ Atreya Basu Deve

Re: SSL/Verisign Confusion

2003-09-08 Thread Bill Barker
> > -dave > > -Original Message- > From: Adam Hardy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 3:43 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: SSL/Verisign Confusion > > > Hi Dave, > how much does it cost at Verisign, and how long is it val

RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion

2003-09-08 Thread Dave Wood
l.com, for example (not free, but $35.00 isn't bad). Also, see http://www.whichssl.org for more good info on the subject. -dave -Original Message- From: Adam Hardy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 3:43 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: SSL/Verisign Conf

Re: SSL/Verisign Confusion

2003-09-07 Thread Christopher Williams
st" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 10:43 AM Subject: Re: SSL/Verisign Confusion > Hi Dave, > how much does it cost at Verisign, and how long is it valid for? And is > this 'openssl' you mentioned a free alternative? > > Adam > > On 09/

Re: SSL/Verisign Confusion

2003-09-07 Thread Adam Hardy
lps. Thanks to all who provided suggestions along the way. Dave -Original Message- From: Dave Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 11:40 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion Well, after all this, I just discovered that VeriSign will b

RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion

2003-09-06 Thread Dave Wood
cat Users List Subject: RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion Well, after all this, I just discovered that VeriSign will basically let you start over if it's within 30 days (which it is). So, for now, I'm going down this path. Just talked to someone at V/S who said it would take just a couple hours

RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion

2003-09-05 Thread Dave Wood
an tell). Still not sure how I got in that messed up state. Thanks, Dave -Original Message- From: Christopher Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 9:43 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: SSL/Verisign Confusion Have you thought of manipulating the keystore

Re: SSL/Verisign Confusion

2003-09-05 Thread Christopher Williams
. - Original Message - From: "Jay Garala" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 3:36 PM Subject: RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion NOTE: You cannot export private key from keystore. -Original

Re: SSL/Verisign Confusion

2003-09-05 Thread John Turner
L/Verisign Confusion I realize you can't do this with keytool. Is there no way to do it at all? I'm beginning to think I might be totally hosed here. Thanks, Dave -Original Message- From: Jay Garala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 8:37 AM To: 'Tomca

RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion

2003-09-05 Thread Dave Wood
So it's possible then...? That's promising. Thanks (in advance) very much. -dave -Original Message- From: Lawrence, Gabriel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 10:13 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion I'm working on a t

RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion

2003-09-05 Thread Lawrence, Gabriel
--Original Message- From: Dave Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 8:07 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion I realize you can't do this with keytool. Is there no way to do it at all? I'm beginning to think I might be totally hosed

RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion

2003-09-05 Thread Jay Garala
Dave Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 11:12 PM To: Tomcat Email List Subject: SSL/Verisign Confusion I'm having a problem getting an SSL certificate from Verisign working correctly. I'm going to include everything I can think of that MIGHT be a problem.

RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion

2003-09-05 Thread Dave Wood
age- From: Jay Garala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 9:21 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion Hmm.. Did you create the PK in Tomcat's keystore or your JDK's keystore? Try the keyclone? Clone your 'company' t

RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion

2003-09-05 Thread Jay Garala
Hmm.. Did you create the PK in Tomcat's keystore or your JDK's keystore? Try the keyclone? Clone your 'company' to 'tomcat'. -Original Message- From: Dave Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 11:07 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subje

RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion

2003-09-05 Thread Dave Wood
27; Subject: RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion NOTE: You cannot export private key from keystore. -Original Message- From: Dave Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 10:32 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion Thanks. With the exception of the op

RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion

2003-09-05 Thread Jay Garala
NOTE: You cannot export private key from keystore. -Original Message- From: Dave Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 10:32 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion Thanks. With the exception of the openssl doc, I've been over these

RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion

2003-09-05 Thread Dave Wood
ally seem to recognize private keys as things that you can work with directly. Thanks again, Dave -Original Message- From: Jay Garala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 7:12 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion Try the Java keyto

RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion

2003-09-05 Thread Jay Garala
Dave Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 1:04 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion Thanks Bill. I think this highlights something I'm really not understanding... Didn't I generate an important "private key" somewhere along th

RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion

2003-09-04 Thread Dave Wood
Behalf Of Bill Barker Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 12:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SSL/Verisign Confusion "Dave Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Thanks Bill. I think this highlights something I'm really not > understan

Re: SSL/Verisign Confusion

2003-09-04 Thread Bill Barker
gt; Dave > > -Original Message- > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Barker > Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 11:06 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: SSL/Verisign Confusion > > > Firstly, it looks like you should wipe you key

RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion

2003-09-04 Thread Dave Wood
OTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Barker Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 11:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SSL/Verisign Confusion Firstly, it looks like you should wipe you keystore and start again. To use a VS cert with Tomcat, the two options I know are: 1) Follow the instructions at http://w

Re: SSL/Verisign Confusion

2003-09-04 Thread Bill Barker
Firstly, it looks like you should wipe you keystore and start again. To use a VS cert with Tomcat, the two options I know are: 1) Follow the instructions at http://www.comu.de/docs/tomcat_ssl.htm. 2) Using openssl or otherwise, convert your cert+key to a pkcs12 file, and use that as your keystore

SSL/Verisign Confusion

2003-09-04 Thread Dave Wood
I'm having a problem getting an SSL certificate from Verisign working correctly. I'm going to include everything I can think of that MIGHT be a problem. Unfortunately, there are a couple things I can't quite remember for certain. Here's the situation: 1. I generated the initial key using an ali

[OT] JDBC confusion

2003-08-14 Thread john-paul delaney
Hello List... newbie question coming up: If I set up a jdbc connection object in one servlet, do I have to close it each time or can the same connection be re-utilized by other servlets each using a different sql statement (perhaps storing the connection as a session attribute?). Is there a si

Re: [OT] JDBC confusion

2003-08-14 Thread Jon Wingfield
I agree with Nix, use a connection pool. One connection per user may be ok when you've got, say, 5 concurrent users but when you've got 1000, 1, Not scalable. http://tomcatfaq.sourceforge.net/database.html http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jndi-datasource-examples-howto.htm

Re: [OT] JDBC confusion

2003-08-14 Thread Nikola Milutinovic
> Hello List... newbie question coming up: Phaser charged... Shields at 80%... Photon torpedos loaded... > If I set up a jdbc connection object in one servlet, do I have to close it each time > or can the same connection be re-utilized by other servlets each using a different > sql statement (per

Re: [OT] JDBC confusion

2003-08-07 Thread Andrew Geery
The "preferred" way of doing this is to use connection pooling. The primary reasons are scalability, speed and simplicity. If you have 5,000 people using your app at the same time, by your method you will have to have 5,000 connections to the database (one per user) stored in the various sessio

DataSourceRealm and virtual hosts confusion

2003-01-17 Thread Scott Dunbar
Hello, I'm attempting to set up a DataSourceRealm within a virtual host. What I would like to do is have every virtual host have it's own DataSource and have a "private" realm within the virtual host. In this way each virtual host owner can manage their own users in a set of DB tables that th

Re: TC 4.1.12 auto re-deploy problem/confusion

2002-12-03 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Mark wrote: > Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 10:07:29 -0500 > From: Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: TC 4.1.12 auto re-deploy problem/confusion > > I have an expanded-war

Re: TC 4.1.12 auto re-deploy problem/confusion

2002-12-03 Thread Mark
At 12/3/2002 09:09 AM, you wrote: Mark writes: I have an expanded-war app where it will initially auto-deploy (ie. expand the directories under /webapps), but not able to get it to hot redeploy after changes are made. By 'hot', I mean automatically have a new.war file re-expanded without resta

Re: TC 4.1.12 auto re-deploy problem/confusion

2002-12-03 Thread David Brown
Mark writes: I have an expanded-war app where it will initially auto-deploy (ie. expand the directories under /webapps), but not able to get it to hot redeploy after changes are made. By 'hot', I mean automatically have a new.war file re-expanded without restarting Tomcat. If I make changes

TC 4.1.12 auto re-deploy problem/confusion

2002-12-03 Thread Mark
I have an expanded-war app where it will initially auto-deploy (ie. expand the directories under /webapps), but not able to get it to hot redeploy after changes are made. By 'hot', I mean automatically have a new.war file re-expanded without restarting Tomcat. If I make changes to the app and c

RE: Confusion about ConnectionPooling with Tomcat 4.

2002-04-18 Thread Clearwater, Pete
pete. -Original Message- From: Clearwater, Pete [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:25 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Confusion about ConnectionPooling with Tomcat 4. Hi Rainer. I am having the same confusion as you. Based on testing

RE: Confusion about ConnectionPooling with Tomcat 4.

2002-04-18 Thread Clearwater, Pete
Hi Rainer. I am having the same confusion as you. Based on testing the time required to get each connection, it appears as though the standard JNDI DataSource lookups do not return any sort of a pooled connection - it took virtually identical times to get a connection from the JNDI DataSource

Confusion about ConnectionPooling with Tomcat 4

2002-04-18 Thread rainer jünger
Hi, I am getting a little confused about the topic weather Tomcat 4.x ist having a Connection Pooling implementet or not. I was following the discussions the last few days and the answers have been a little contradicting. Therfore my question loud and clear ; ) Is there a Connection Pooling us

Tomcat4/IIS confusion

2002-04-08 Thread Dobridge, Thomas A
I've read the bug reports (http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5647 )and scoured the mesage boards and I am still confused as to whether there is a confirmed version of Tomcat 4.0.x that will works correctly with isapi_redirect.dll on IIS to create fully populated Ajp13Principal ob

RE: Servlet and Web.xml confusion

2002-01-08 Thread PELOQUIN,JEFFREY (Non-HP-Boise,ex1)
ry 08, 2002 1:19 PM To: Tomcat Users List; David Bazell Subject: Re: Servlet and Web.xml confusion Hi... > Hi, > > I have tomcat 4.0.1 running on a Redhat 7.1 system. I can get the examples > servlets working, the ones that come with tomcat. > > I installed some simple servl

Re: Servlet and Web.xml confusion

2002-01-08 Thread John Chan
Hi... > I believe that you need to modify the server.xml to add the context. As it > currently stands, Tomcat has no way of knowing that the directory "hello" > actually exists. > > The statement to add (at the minimum) would be something like: > > . > > Anyhow, hope that helps. > > Joh

Re: Servlet and Web.xml confusion

2002-01-08 Thread John Chan
Hi... > Hi, > > I have tomcat 4.0.1 running on a Redhat 7.1 system. I can get the examples > servlets working, the ones that come with tomcat. > > I installed some simple servlets in webapps/ROOT and they work. I put one > in > $CATALINA_HOME/webapps/ROOT/WEB-INF/classes/hello/HelloServlet2.cl

Servlet and Web.xml confusion

2002-01-08 Thread David Bazell
Hi, I have tomcat 4.0.1 running on a Redhat 7.1 system. I can get the examples servlets working, the ones that come with tomcat. I installed some simple servlets in webapps/ROOT and they work. I put one in $CATALINA_HOME/webapps/ROOT/WEB-INF/classes/hello/HelloServlet2.class and invoked it wi

XML Confusion

2002-01-08 Thread Hugh Eland
Hi, I am getting wierd results running Tomcat 4.1 XML. I want different applications to have separate XML files, so have attempted to follow the instructions 'If you wish to *not* make any XML parser visible to all web applications, this can be accomplished by copying the "xerces.jar" file f

RE: web.xml file confusion

2001-12-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Purcell, Scott wrote: > Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 14:19:09 -0600 > From: "Purcell, Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Tomcat Users List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE:

RE: web.xml file confusion

2001-12-13 Thread Purcell, Scott
List Subject: Re: web.xml file confusion On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Purcell, Scott wrote: > Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 13:34:18 -0600 > From: "Purcell, Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]&#

Re: web.xml file confusion

2001-12-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Purcell, Scott wrote: > Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 13:34:18 -0600 > From: "Purcell, Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > S

web.xml file confusion

2001-12-13 Thread Purcell, Scott
Hello, I am working out of Martys book on Servlets, and there is an example of using the init block to get some parameters from the web.xml file. When I searched for web.xml to find it, I found one in about each directory. I do not think that is right. Where should the web.xml file live? Also, Is

Re: [TC4] Confusion over JspWriter and IOException in compiled JSPs

2001-09-24 Thread chris brown
> > But if I import explicitly java.io.IOException, it might cause unqualified > > references to the Tomcat IOException class to become mixed up too ! > I dont think there is a tomcat IOException... the compiler was looking for > that class because it was compiling a servlet that referenced a clas

Re: [TC4] Confusion over JspWriter and IOException in compiled JSPs(Tomcat bug...?)

2001-09-24 Thread Dmitri Colebatch
ternal Tomcat classes and other classes with the same > names are ALL imported explicitly, there's still as much potential for > confusion. the servlet code generated by jasper only imports the servlet and jsp packages and the jasper packages perhaps even the jasper packages shouldn&#x

Re: [TC4] Confusion over JspWriter and IOException in compiled JSPs (Tomcat bug...?)

2001-09-24 Thread chris brown
whatsoever -- because if both the internal Tomcat classes and other classes with the same names are ALL imported explicitly, there's still as much potential for confusion. Using fully-qualified class names everywhere in application code slows down development (more typing) and may reduce reada

Re: [TC4] Confusion over JspWriter and IOException in compiled JSPs(Tomcat bug...?)

2001-09-24 Thread Dmitri Colebatch
ot found in throws" > > It would seem that although I'm using standard API classes/interfaces > (JspWriter, IOException), the "import" statements in the generated ".java" > files based on the ".jsp" files are too vague... "java.io.IOExcep

[TC4] Confusion over JspWriter and IOException in compiled JSPs (Tomcat bug...?)

2001-09-24 Thread chris brown
are too vague... "java.io.IOException" is getting mixed up with "org.apache.jsp.IOException". This may be in turn related to some confusion between the public "JspWriter" class and some underlying implementation class with the same unqualified name. As it happen

Re: tomcat 3.2.3 confusion with mod_jk/ajpv13

2001-09-04 Thread Mark Boucher
hings turn out" -- Art Linkletter Jason Novotny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@bullwinkle.lbl.gov on 09/04/2001 12:21:05 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: tomcat 3.2.3 confusion with mod_jk/ajpv13 I want to use t

Re: tomcat 3.2.3 confusion with mod_jk/ajpv13

2001-09-04 Thread Thad Humphries
Add instead Jason Novotny wrote: >I want to use the latest stable release of Tomcat with support for >SSL and Apache, so I've downloaded 3.2.3. Reading the docs, I find that >mod_jk is intended to be an eventual replacement for mod_jserv

tomcat 3.2.3 confusion with mod_jk/ajpv13

2001-09-04 Thread Jason Novotny
I want to use the latest stable release of Tomcat with support for SSL and Apache, so I've downloaded 3.2.3. Reading the docs, I find that mod_jk is intended to be an eventual replacement for mod_jserv and has better support for SSL. However, I see no mention of Ajp13 in my server.xml fi

Re: confusion

2001-08-28 Thread asheesh
- Original Message - From: vinod tomcat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 8:01 PM Subject: Re: confusion > > >1. IF I UPDATE ANY JSP FILE AND UPLOAD , DO I NEED > TO MAKE ANY CHANGES WITH WORK DIRECT. SOME BODY TOLD

Re: confusion

2001-08-28 Thread Dmitri Colebatch
ok - hang on a second... no need for the caps... in case you weren't aware, caps are interpreted as SHOUTING and is considered rude. On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, [iso-8859-1] vinod tomcat wrote: > >1. IF I UPDATE ANY JSP FILE AND UPLOAD , DO I NEED > TO MAKE ANY CHANGES WITH WORK DIRECT. SOME BODY

Re: confusion

2001-08-28 Thread vinod tomcat
1. IF I UPDATE ANY JSP FILE AND UPLOAD , DO I NEED TO MAKE ANY CHANGES WITH WORK DIRECT. SOME BODY TOLD ME THAT I WILL HAVE TO DELETE THE CONCERNED .CLASS FILES ??? 2. IF I MAKE CHANGES WITH THE ANY CONFIGURATION FILE ...DO I NEED TO MAKE ANY CHANGES WITH ANY OTHER FILE ... I HAD REPLAC

Re: confusion

2001-08-28 Thread asheesh
- Original Message - From: vinod tomcat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 7:19 PM Subject: confusion > > > hi friends, > > can anybody help me ..i m in fix .. > > > 1. some body said me that containt

Re: confusion

2001-08-28 Thread Dmitri Colebatch
The work directory is where .jsp files are compiled first to .java then to .class files. You shouldn't need to worry about it at all. If you delete files in there I think you could have problems while tomcat is running, but if you stop tomcat you can certainly delete all the files and they will

confusion

2001-08-28 Thread vinod tomcat
hi friends, can anybody help me ..i m in fix .. 1. some body said me that containts of work directiory in tomcat are generated automatically and normal functionaing of a site dosent get affected if all class files in work directiory are deleted . is this true ??? even if i delete all cl

Virtual Host Confusion

2001-08-03 Thread Robert Schmid
I swear I've read the documentation! I have Virtual Hosts Contexts defined; Server.xml httpd.conf: ServerName www.foobar.net JkMount /*.jsp ajp13 JkMount /*.xml ajp13 JkMount /servlet/* ajp13 AddType text/xml .xml Documen

Re: Virtual Host Confusion

2001-08-02 Thread Dmitri Colebatch
Robert Schmid wrote: > > At 8/3/2001 08:53 AM +1000, you wrote: Robert, > I have strange habits in site design I'd like to be able to swap an > index.html for index.xml. I've got a better understanding of things now, > but I'm not sure why there is an enforced segregation of files. Since most

Re: Virtual Host Confusion

2001-08-02 Thread Dmitri Colebatch
Robert, what are you trying to achieve here? There are two things about this that strike me as odd: 1. in httpd.conf you have ServerName www.foobar.net, whilst in server.xml you have host name="www.raptor.net" - as I understand it these should be the same name. 2. the DocumentRoot you have for

Re: Virtual Host Confusion

2001-08-02 Thread Robert Schmid
At 8/3/2001 08:53 AM +1000, you wrote: >Robert, > >what are you trying to achieve here? There are two things about this >that strike me as odd: > >1. in httpd.conf you have ServerName www.foobar.net, whilst in >server.xml you have host name="www.raptor.net" - as I understand it >these should be t

Virtual Host Confusion

2001-08-01 Thread Robert Schmid
I swear I've read the documentation! I have Virtual Hosts Contexts defined; Server.xml httpd.conf: ServerName www.foobar.net JkMount /*.jsp ajp13 JkMount /*.xml ajp13 JkMount /servlet/* ajp13 AddType text/xml .xml Documen

Re: Apache/Tomcat confusion

2000-12-15 Thread Filip Hanik
his really well Filip - Original Message - From: "Simon Orchanian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 11:03 AM Subject: Apache/Tomcat confusion Hi, I'm just a bit confused. I currently have the following: Solaris 2.7 Ap

Apache/Tomcat confusion

2000-12-15 Thread Simon Orchanian
Hi, I'm just a bit confused. I currently have the following: Solaris 2.7 Apache 1.3.14 (/usr/local/apache) Tomcat 3.2 (/usr/local/tomcat3.2) I built Apache with DSO enabled. server.xml: (Is this correct?) httpd.conf: (Is this correct?) LoadModulejk_module libexec/mod_jk.so JkWorkers

Re: confusion on running Stand alone

2000-10-25 Thread Paul Russell
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 11:01:39AM -0400, John Bateman wrote: > I ask for > HEAD / HTTP/1.0 > > and this is returned > HTTP/1.0 500 Internal Server Error > Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 15:17:26 GMT > Servlet-Engine: Tomcat Web Server/3.1 (JSP 1.1; Servlet 2.2; Java 1.2.2; > Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i386; java.

RE: confusion on running Stand alone

2000-10-25 Thread John Bateman
way there as the Tomcat servlet engine IS running?!? > -Original Message- > From: Jagannathan, Giri (c) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 10:18 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: confusion on running Stand alone > > > try th

RE: confusion on running Stand alone

2000-10-25 Thread John Bateman
I ask for HEAD / HTTP/1.0 and this is returned HTTP/1.0 500 Internal Server Error Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 15:17:26 GMT Servlet-Engine: Tomcat Web Server/3.1 (JSP 1.1; Servlet 2.2; Java 1.2.2; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i386; java.vendor=Sun Microsystems Inc.) Content-Language: en Content-Type: text/html Sta

Re: confusion on running Stand alone

2000-10-25 Thread Paul Russell
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 10:22:03AM -0400, John Bateman wrote: > Also, if I go to my shell and type "telnet 207.139.136.81 8080" I get a > connection so something SEEMS to be waiting there listening for a > connection. Does whatever it is that answers seem to speak HTTP? Assuming you're talking T

RE: confusion on running Stand alone

2000-10-25 Thread Jagannathan, Giri (c)
try this on unix box: at the prompt, type out netstat -a | grep PORTNO -Original Message- From: John Bateman [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 10:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: confusion on running Stand alone I ca

RE: confusion on running Stand alone

2000-10-25 Thread Jagannathan, Giri (c)
try this on unix: at the prompt, type netstat -a |grep PORTNO -Original Message- From: John Bateman [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 10:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: confusion on running Stand alone I'

RE: confusion on running Stand alone

2000-10-25 Thread John Bateman
t.jar:/usr/local/l ib/jconn2.jar" Context log: path="/admin" Automatic context load docBase="/usr/local/jakarta-tomcat/webapps/admin" Context log: path="/admin" Adding context path="/admin" docBase="/usr/local/jakarta-tomcat/webapps/admin" Starting endpoint po

RE: confusion on running Stand alone

2000-10-25 Thread John Bateman
00 5:18 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: confusion on running Stand alone > > > try http://localhost:8080 > > -Original Message- > From: Stephen Adkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 2:13 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] &g

  1   2   >