Donwgrading and using mod_webapp is the WORST thing you could do, for all
sorts of reasons. Security, for one. Performance, for another. Future
extensibility and growth, for another.
Mod_jk and mod_jk2 work. This is a fact. There's nothing anyone can do if
you want to give up learning how
grateful to many people in this list.
Good luck - don't go backwards, go forwards...
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 June 2003 13:42
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: installing a servlet
Donwgrading and using mod_webapp is the WORST
If people are having problems getting mod_jk to work there are
probably reasons. It may be true that mod_jk works but not always as
expected. I have a system that works fine until mod_jk gets involved
then java starts barfing up 'exceptions' on a couple of jsp's.
Naturally the developers
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 14:42, John Turner wrote:
Donwgrading and using mod_webapp is the WORST thing you could do, for all
sorts of reasons. Security, for one. Performance, for another. Future
extensibility and growth, for another.
My question was: downgrade to mod_jk? (I have read that
: Tony Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: June 24, 2003 10:02 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: installing a servlet
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 14:42, John Turner wrote:
Donwgrading and using mod_webapp is the WORST thing you could do, for
all
sorts of reasons. Security, for one. Performance
Howdy,
There seems to be a great deal of discussion about JK2. I know that
JK2
is the outstanding issue for me in getting Tomcat running. Maybe it
JK2 is not required to get tomcat running. It's one option that you can
use if you want to connect Apache to tomcat.
Yoav Shapira
This
:25 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: installing a servlet
Howdy,
There seems to be a great deal of discussion about JK2. I know that
JK2
is the outstanding issue for me in getting Tomcat running. Maybe it
JK2 is not required to get tomcat running. It's one option that you can
use if you
This is also on my wish list for docs. To have many many examples, for example:
jk (worker.properties http.conf)
- Simple
- With advanced options
- With multiple workers (one host)
- With multiple workers loadbalancer (one host)
- With multiple workers mulitple loadbalancers (one host)
- All
Sorry, it wasn't my intent to criticize anyone, I apologize if that was the
way it came across.
JK and JK2 work.
The difference that you have encountered moving to 4.1.24 is most likely
attributable to the Invoker servlet being disabled by default. It is
disabled by default for a reason:
Mostly agree with John. But I love jk2 because it is simple to config.
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: June 24, 2003 9:37 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: installing a servlet
Sorry, it wasn't my intent to criticize anyone, I apologize
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: installing a servlet
Sorry, it wasn't my intent to criticize anyone, I apologize if that was
the
way it came across.
JK and JK2 work.
The difference that you have encountered moving to 4.1.24 is most
likely
attributable to the Invoker servlet being disabled by default
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 15:37, John Turner wrote:
Sorry, it wasn't my intent to criticize anyone, I apologize if that was the
way it came across.
That's OK - I am slow at re-integrating newbie mode...
- the actual URL you are typing into the browser's address bar (or the
value of your Form's
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 14:33, John Turner wrote:
Please post:
- workers2.properties
# Define the communication channel
[shm]
file=/var/log/shm.file
size=1048576
# Example socket channel, override port and host.
[channel.socket:localhost:8009]
port=8009
host=127.0.0.1
# define the worker
There's no URL mapping in workers2.properties that would send your servlet
request to Tomcat.
The only requests for www.tgds.net that will ever get to Tomcat are those
URLs that end in *.jsp because of this mapping:
[uri:www.tgds.net/*.jsp]
If you want to map another URI, such as
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 14:49, John Turner wrote:
thanks for your kind patience John! Reading through the FAQs this seems
to be a common problem and others seem to have fixed it much more
easily...
There's no URL mapping in workers2.properties that would send your servlet
request to Tomcat.
ok i forgotten to tell i tried it but i get an error liket that :
BIND_error Adress in use
- Original Message -
From: John Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 8:10 PM
Subject: Re: installing a servlet
No problem, glad I
From my work of yesterday it seems that the easiest way to get a servlet
to run is to downgrade to Tomcat 4.0.x and use mod_webapp...
This isn't a very encouraging experience.
Cheers
Tony Grant
--
www.tgds.net Library management software toolkit,
redhat linux on Sony Vaio C1XD,
Dreamweaver MX
Hello again,
Yesterdays question was asked because I am unable to install and run a
servlet (form mail servlet) from an apache Jk-Coyote enabled Tomcat
4.1.24. I have tried all the possible and imaginable paths and it always
returns 404. If I run Tomcat standalone the servlet works just fine.
I
Please post:
- JkMount statements from Apache's httpd.conf (or other file if they are
included into httd.conf)
- workers.properties
- relevant Host section from server.xml
- relevant Context section from server.xml
- servlet and servlet-mapping tags for this servlet from web.xml
John
On 20 Jun
19 matches
Mail list logo