with package : %@ page import=testPackage.TestData % is ok
but without package : %@ page import=TestData % you get exception.
See http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jsp?forum=31thread=231550.
You ought to be able to use TestData without an import, since it is in the
default package, but
Noel,
I think they have clamped down in tomcat 4.1.X all classes now muct be
within packages. This wasn't the case in tomcat 4.0.X or before. When I
changed from 4.0.6 to 4.1.12 I had to formally package all of my beans
regards,
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL
So, in this scenario .. if a url without a directory is given and without a
trailign slash, the redirect would not occur? That would fix this issue.
I could certainly get behind that. :)
if the final element of the path is a directory (or a context) without a
trailing
slash, redirect to the
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Surendra Kumar wrote:
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 10:25:51 +0530
From: Surendra Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IPv6 Support in Tomcat
Hi All
Is IPv6 support available for any
Well, a few things come to mind.
1. A comparison was made - using tomcat as a web server is like racing a mac
truck. Well, for someone new to tomcat and apache (I just arrived from
microsoft/iis land) the correct usage pattern was less than obvious ... I
just knew that most people used
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, David Hemingway wrote:
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 18:18:09 +1100
From: David Hemingway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tomcat 4.1.18 jsp import and include error
Noel,
I think they have
Just one more thought on the matter, for me tonight:
I've deployed an app using Tomcat Standalone (www.hotel.us) and while there
have been several issues that were a little less than obvious, I have found
a solution to every single one of them and am overall pretty satisfied with
tomcat. but
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, neal wrote:
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 23:11:44 -0800
From: neal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
So, in this scenario .. if a url without a directory is
In you previous email you say:
This still screws up relative references for people that use wierd welcome
file paths like 'foo/bar.html', but will work for the majority.
What do you mean by wierd welcome file paths. Will most relative paths
still work? Is this the same sort of relative file
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, neal wrote:
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 23:38:13 -0800
From: neal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
In you previous email you say:
This still screws up
Anybody who can listen to your traffic, can hijack
a session. He just has to create a request with the
same sessionid (either as cookie or in the url).
So after you go back from https to http you open
the session to an attacker.
The risks that are involved with that, depends on the
201 - 211 of 211 matches
Mail list logo
