Re: I'm beging to lose hope Redhat 8 , tomcat 4.1.24, apache 2.0.40

Filip Hanik (lists) wrote: [Fri Feb 06 02:41:32 2004] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (477)]: Attempting to map URI '/index.jsp' do you have all the worker matches in your worker.properties commented out? Currently yes, I assume now I have to uncomment all my matches in my woker properties, but let

CoyoteConnector startup warning

Hello I've got tomcat 4.1.29 Recently I changed my http connector with Coyote Connector and my server.xml fragment is . Connector className=org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector port=9517 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 enableLookups=true acceptCount=100

HELLO

ALERT!!! This e-mail contained one or more infected files. The following attachments were infected and have been repaired: No attachments are in this category. The following infected attachments were deleted: 1. message.zip: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The following infected attachments were blocked

Re: [Repost] TC 5.0.18: behaviour of security-constraint changed??

Bill, thanks for confirming this.. I really wonder why nobody else noticed this before - I'm probably the only one using protected dirs with one character :-) Yann Yup, that's a bug. It's fixed now in the CVS, and will appear in 5.0.19 (due out in a week or so). Yann Cebron [EMAIL

{Virus?} Hi

] virus !!! Note to Help Desk: Look on the MailScanner in /var/spool/MailScanner/quarantine/20040207 (message i17DK2015089). -- Postmaster MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

root context loaded again under its docbase name

I've seen and asked about this about a year ago but since it wasn't important, I didn't bother chasing it up when I found no solution. It's happening again. Tomcat loads my context twice. Once for root and once with the name of its WAR file. My war file is called gargantus.war. This is my

tomcat 5. some basic questions

hello. i have one machine in production mode with apache 2 and tomcat 4.1.29. i am thinkin for using tomcat 5. i have several questions: 1.- the tomcat 5 configuration i diferent, comparing with the tomcat 4.1.29 configurarion? (vitual domains, db connecion pools using Commons DBCP..) 2.- when i

RE: root context loaded again under its docbase name

I definitely have the same problem. And Tomcat does not execute context.xml. I presume is due to the error message: context already in use. Do you have the some problem? Hernani -Original Message- From: Adam Hardy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: sabado, 7 de Fevereiro de 2004 12:47 To:

RE: tomcat 5. some basic questions

You will experience a lot of problems making the applications running in this new version. I had everything ok and running under Tomcat 4.1.x and I made the terrible mistake of changing the version. It seems it is due to the way the context.xml is supposed to work in this new version. I am not an

About_log_analyzer_perfomance_urgent

Hello! Does anybody know any log analyzer in java (java servlets, applets, jsp)? I need to analyze apache, tomcat logs. It could be with database. Does anybody have tomcat thread analyzer or some shell script which analyzes threds? Also I need advice about tomcat monitor application. Does

Re: System.out.println, Where art thou?

I agree, it should be.. it is not.. I have not change ANY default settings that came out of the box.. This is why I'm so stumped.. I have tested this on two installs.. (one on NT4 and one on WinXP) both are failing... It works fine when run within JBuilder using 4.1.27.. ???

Re: TC 5 production use

We run Tomcat on 8080 using Cisco Routers for port redirection. Nobody has to type in a port number. Well, I agree that would work for everyone who just buys some hardware to give the illusion of using port 80. Of course, running tomcat on port 80 itself would be nice if anybody knows

Re: System.out.println, Where art thou?

Correction it is 4.1.28 not 4.1.18... sorry.. John B. Moore wrote: Moved up to Tomcat 4.1.18 (from 3.x) and I've seemed to have lost the ability to see stdout statments in the log files.. In addition my Log4j loging output failing to appear. (another issue, but maybe related..) what is most

Re: root context loaded again under its docbase name

I get no error message - I just grepped the log file. For me the problem is totally benign - unless I decide that I want to have a context with the same name as my root context's war file. I suggest that you are getting an error because you have doubled the Context somehow - perhaps you still

Re: TC 5 production use

David Wall wrote: We run Tomcat on 8080 using Cisco Routers for port redirection. Nobody has to type in a port number. And the best part is that we're happy to know that some more heavily used production sites are using TC 5, which was the original question and interest! Interesting how

Re: TC 5 production use

I tryed today current release TC5 and seen errors: 1. I have the following lines which run under 4.1.29 but not in TC5 (locale exists in the HttpSession !) jsp:useBean id=locale scope=session class=java.util.Locale / fmt:setLocale value=%= locale % / I got [javac] symbol : constructor Locale

Re: TC 5 production use

On Saturday 07 February 2004 12:18 pm, you wrote: We run Tomcat on 8080 using Cisco Routers for port redirection. Nobody has to type in a port number. Well, I agree that would work for everyone who just buys some hardware to give the illusion of using port 80. Of course, running tomcat on

Tomcat hosting service in the UK?

Can anyone name a few good Tomcat hosting services based in the UK? Ie, the servers are residing in the UK. With MySQL as well. I can't seem to find any on the Internet. Thanks. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.

Re: TC 5 production use

this practice is rather common. for a couple different reasons. 1. routers/load balancer all have redirect capability. actually not all, but most routers do. 2. running webserver on port 8080 means it doesn't require running it as a service or root user 3. hardware load balancing is more

Re: System.out.println, Where art thou?

Update: Well, when things get wierd it is best to go back to basics I created a very simple servlet with System.out.println statements and deployed it.. That works fine and the output shows up in the stdout.log. That means there is something in the servlet code that is mucking

Apache 2.0.48 + Tomcat 4.1.29 + Mod_jk2

Does anyone have Tomcat 4.1.29 running in-process with Apache 2.0.48 and mod_jk2 on W2K? I keep getting the following error when I start Apache: [Sat Feb 07 17:30:16 2004] [notice] Parent: Created child process 3192 [Sat Feb 07 17:30:16 2004] [notice] Child 3192: Child process is running

RE: Apache 2.0.48 + Tomcat 4.1.29 + Mod_jk2

downgrade to 4.1.27that should solve it :) Filip -Original Message- From: David Short [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 5:37 PM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: Apache 2.0.48 + Tomcat 4.1.29 + Mod_jk2 Does anyone have Tomcat 4.1.29 running in-process with

Re: Apache 2.0.48 + Tomcat 4.1.29 + Mod_jk2

Filip Hanik (lists) wrote: downgrade to 4.1.27that should solve it :) what??? with 4.1.29 not found ? and with 4.1.27 found? thank you Enrique P.S. i apology for my spanglish Filip -Original Message- From: David Short [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 5:37