Re: [OT] Re: JSP under /WEB-INF folder PROTOCOL PAGES (ProtocolPages)
snip I suspect that it is relatively small and, when you introduce sophisticated state and caching options, it may be faster. Relative to what? To the web server dealing with it? I would suspect it's actually relatively BIG compared to that. I'm certainly willing to be proved wrong though. /snip As we agree, we just need to get the data. I think there should be a lot of standard testing out there that is more reliable than I am probably going to do off the top. I will look around a bit and maybe someone will chime in with some help here. snip That might be true... one other point to remember though is that the more unusual things you do, the harder it will be to get people able to maintain it. I fight standards at work as much as the next guy just because creative people don't like standards forced on them, but clever solutions usual equal difficult to maintain solutions. I don't think I'm telling you something you don't know :) But, that's not my argument, so don't spend any time on it. Just another side track we could go down :) /snip I am 100% in favor of keeping maintenance low. That was my original primary objective going here. I could not believe how much time was being spent on URLs, base tags, etc., etc., with all the concomittant confusion throughout the development process. snip I think the bigger hit is reading the danged thing. This obviously is especially so when there is an ongoing use of changing the JSP page. This has no penalty with ProtocolPages. /snip I just mean the more complicated parsing rules that go with JSP, as well as everything else. snip That's what I like, woman that are easy to please :) (You were left SO wide open there I just couldn't resist!) /snip Heh, heh! Remind me never to fence with you, Frank. Actually, and this is really off topic, in my milieu I am dearly loved because I have really learned how to be a friend, husband, etc. This has been the largest accomplishment by far in my life and the one I most cherish. snip * (Does the app server pass the response back to the web server to serve, or does it serve it directly to the client at that point? I'm actually not sure, but let's be optimistic and say the web server is out of the equation at this point, although I suspect that's NOT the case) In any case, images are returned to client- /snip I think that the ResourceAction class actually acts as the web server and that is why the return is null. The class writes to the responses output stream and that is all the server does, right? FileInputStream fis = new FileInputStream(fileName); BufferedInputStream bis = new BufferedInputStream(fis); byte[] bytes = new byte[bis.available()]; OutputStreamos= response.getOutputStream(); bis.read(bytes); os.write(bytes); os.flush(); os.close(); snip There is clearly more work done with the second chart because the app server is now involved. How costly is all that work? /snip Again, I am not sure about this, and it is the sort of thing that one typically makes mistakes about if one does not go by the data. So, I am going to hold judgment on it, but my intuitions are not running in the same direction as yours. I keep remembering how the following of good OOP principles can make Java applications faster that C applications doing the exact same thing, although most think that would not be the case. Just the other day I was reading about a guy who tried and failed to do some imaging work in early Java and had to go to C. Now Java is faster in that area. snip You could make the argument that because any servlet-based application is incurring those costs with most requests, what's the big deal about adding a few more? To a degree that would be a reasonable argument, but scalability is most certainly at risk because viewed from the point of view of the app server, a single page really corresponds to 10 app server requests. /snip I think there are trade-offs that will need to be measured. For example, I can envision with some of the stuff I do creating whole pages dynamically with images. The new Java imaging stuff is really, really, cool on this. Flash has its side too. snip Even if it's all done in the most efficient way, those ten requests look, for all intents and purposes, like 10 simultaneous USERS (assuming 1 request per user). So, maybe your app server can handle 100 concurrent requests... If the web server was allowed to serve the images, your app server still has 100 slots available to service requests, which corresponds generally to 100 concurrent users... If it's serving 10 images for each physical user though, now you can only service 10 concurrent users, so you've reduced your overall server capacity (as viewed by outside clients) by 90%. Ouch. /snip Now just one moment, Bub! LOL ;-) You really are not seeing the ways you can save time here. For
Re: [OT] Re: JSP under /WEB-INF folder PROTOCOL PAGES (ProtocolPages)
I think the worst case is 22 versus 32, Frank. with 10 images. See your note and then my reasoning below that. snip Even if it's all done in the most efficient way, those ten requests look, for all intents and purposes, like 10 simultaneous USERS (assuming 1 request per user). So, maybe your app server can handle 100 concurrent requests... If the web server was allowed to serve the images, your app server still has 100 slots available to service requests, which corresponds generally to 100 concurrent users... If it's serving 10 images for each physical user though, now you can only service 10 concurrent users, so you've reduced your overall server capacity (as viewed by outside clients) by 90%. Ouch. I fully acknowledge those are rough, worst-case numbers... I certainly don't mean to imply that your approach is 90% worse. Not at all! Just trying to illustrate the problem, as I see it, in certain environments. /snip app server = (AS) struts server = (SS) req = request -- = pass res = response With ResourceAction ___ First case HTML = req (AS) res (AS) = 2 Second image JPEG (say) = req (AS) -- res (SS) = 3 . Tenth image JPEG (say) = req (AS) -- res (SS) = 3 WIthout ResourceAction ___ First case HTML = req (AS) res (AS) = 2 First image JPEG (say) = req (AS) res (AS) = 2 Second image JPEG (say) = req (AS) res (AS) = 2 . Tenth image JPEG (say) = req (AS) res (AS) = 2 This is 22 versus 32. Apparently you forgot (I think?) that the app server has to handle ten images too. They don't just go out with the page, although we are looking at this in a very oversimplified sense. There is no question that the AS is quicker with HTML than the SS, but I am not so sure about the images. The SS may be faster. There is lots of room here for tuning. -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~ You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep. ~Native Proverb~ Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary for eagles to be crows. We are poor . . . but we are free. ~Hunkesni (Sitting Bull), Hunkpapa Sioux~ This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Updating webapps in a running production cluster.
Hey Robert, i have also successfull test the cluster with mod_jk2.0.4 but this module is out of date and unsupported. Only the mod_jk is under development. s. http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/ Regards Peter Roberto Cosenza schrieb: I do mean mod_jk2. Could this be the problem? /roberto - Original Message - From: Peter Rossbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 10:42 PM Subject: Re: Updating webapps in a running production cluster. Please update to Apache 2.0.52 and I hope you mean mod_jk 1.2.8 not a mod_jk2 Regards Peter Roberto Cosenza schrieb: We used : jakarta-tomcat-5.5.4 apache 2.0.49 mod_jk2 (jakarta-tomcat-connectors-1.2.8-src) Linux webster2 2.4.26 #11 SMP Thu Apr 22 13:16:46 CEST 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux jdk-1_5_0_01-linux-i586.bin CATALINA_OPTS='-Xmx512m -Xms256m -XX:MaxPermSize=256M' I will test a new version and let you know. - Original Message - From: Peter Rossbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 8:04 PM Subject: Re: Updating webapps in a running production cluster. Hello, with which tomcat version you test this, please try the new 5.5.7 and tell us the result! :-) Please tell us your env, Apache, mod_jk JDK, OS Thanx Peter PS: You can find my cluster dev template at http://tomcat.objektpark.org/examples/05_02_tomcat_example.tar.gz, Sorry the docs are german and it works with tomcat 5.5.5m jdk 5, apache 2.0.52, mod_jk 1.2.8 on Windows/Linux Roberto Cosenza schrieb: Sorry if I insist with this post. Has anybody succeeded in updating a webapp in a tomcat cluster without loosing (any)requests? I´m wondering if this is possible at all with tomcat. If we don´t provide a solution we are forced to switch to an other servlet container :- Does anybody know if moving to Jboss, with tomcat as a servlet container, will help? Thanx - Original Message - From: Roberto Cosenza [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 8:59 PM Subject: Re: Updating webapps in a running production cluster. We have done some testing in this direction. Two tomcat in a cluster, with session replication. Shutdown B, update B, restart B Shutdown A, update A, restartAB What we experience is that, when shutting down any of the two servers. 1) Few requests are lost (let's say, on our machine, for 0.30 seconds?) 2) Objects stored in the session disappear temporarly, causing eventually annoing npe's. We were wondering if it is possible to achieve an higher reliability but we - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Where is jkstatus function in jk version 1.2.8?
Hey Richard, I hope also that Mladen can add this feature to next mod_jk release. :-) At the Apache 2.x cvs Head mod_proxy_ajp has a very fine status page. Peter Richard Mixon (qwest) schrieb: I understand that the jk 1.2.8 connector supercedes the deprecated jk2 connector. I had read previous posting that indicated version 1.2.8 of jk contained equivalent or better function/features than jk2. However the jk2 connector contains documentation on a jkstatus administration interface that seems to offer monitoring and (maybe) some management functions. I do not see this in the jk documentation. Is that feature there? Thanks - Richard - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [OT] Advertising website
From: Didier McGillis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] One trick that I know of and requires some software. Is to setup 4 to 5 sites filled with links back to your pages, and similar content, and of course you link to those sites. If Google notice you spamming the index in this way then they reserve the right not to list your site. Also, it appears they're now autodetecting the IP addresses of the 'copy' sites and are reducing the ranking of sites that are hosted at the same IP. So if you *are* going to risk this, you'll need sites hosted with different people. - Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] Re: JSP under /WEB-INF folder PROTOCOL PAGES (ProtocolPages)
Dakota Jack wrote: I just mean the more complicated parsing rules that go with JSP, as well as everything else. Ok, gotcha. But, this only applies for the first access to the JSP, right? From then on it's a servlet invocation (which is more expensive than returning just a plain'old HTML document, right? But now I am splitting hairs) Heh, heh! Remind me never to fence with you, Frank. Actually, and this is really off topic, in my milieu I am dearly loved because I have really learned how to be a friend, husband, etc. This has been the largest accomplishment by far in my life and the one I most cherish. That's all that counts in the end. I have a wife of ten years and two great kids (well, most of the time they are great anyway), and although I have to remind myself of it sometimes because I get so wrapped up in other things that aren't as important, they are without a doubt my greatest accomplishment. I think that the ResourceAction class actually acts as the web server and that is why the return is null. The class writes to the responses output stream and that is all the server does, right? I thought so too at first, but upon further reflection I'm not so sure... If a request comes in to the web server and then it forwards it on to the app server, that would mean at some very low level that the web server was passing along the connection to the app server... I'm not so sure it's anything that complex... It may be that the app server renders the response stream, but then passes it back to the web server to return to the client. The bottom line though is that we're talking a level low enough that I don't know the answer for sure. Again, I am not sure about this, and it is the sort of thing that one typically makes mistakes about if one does not go by the data. So, I am going to hold judgment on it, but my intuitions are not running in the same direction as yours. I keep remembering how the following of good OOP principles can make Java applications faster that C applications doing the exact same thing, although most think that would not be the case. Just the other day I was reading about a guy who tried and failed to do some imaging work in early Java and had to go to C. Now Java is faster in that area. snip I too await the data :) But, I think you'd have to agree that for your approach to wind up being faster, much like when Java programs are faster than C programs, it must be due to some hidden optimization going on. I mean, on an operation-per-operation basis, C will ALWAYS beat Java... Simply put, there will always be less machine code ops going on with a C program at the lowest levels (assuming they algorithmically equivalent) than a Java program. But, because a Java program can be optimized at runtime, that's where the speed gains occur that you can't get with C. Something similar must be happening if your approach winds up being faster. All things being equal (ceteris paribus), that's the only logical conclusion to reach. That doesn't make it the right one of course :) The data will be the decider... I think there are trade-offs that will need to be measured. For example, I can envision with some of the stuff I do creating whole pages dynamically with images. The new Java imaging stuff is really, really, cool on this. Flash has its side too. No argument there... it's the same with OOP vs. strictly procedural code... if we assume we're always talking a straight compile to machine code and similar optimizations in both, procedural code should generally be faster for the same reason I talked about above. Clearly though, the benefits of an OOP approach outweigh any difference. Same could be true here. Now just one moment, Bub! LOL ;-) You really are not seeing the ways you can save time here. For example, there is such a thing as caching, pragmas and expiry headers which can be set with a response in a way that the meta tags just cannot handle. But now your pushing those caching decisions back on the browser, right? I thought one of your basic premises was to not trust the browser to construct URLs and such? Wouldn't you have the same distrust for caching? (and probably worse since that is at least at the users' discrection) There will be savings of creating no calls where pure HTML would be lost. There will be other things like this too. Remember too that the ResourceAction class is acting as a multithreaded alternative mini-server. Indeed, the approach allows us to get the images, for example, from some other server that is maximized to do just this. Conceivably that could be quicker for cached images. Remember I said conceivably. The ability to be flexible can make for great rewards in efficiency and fluidity that are not immediately obvious. Granted, some additional flexibility might outweigh any problems. If you rolled my BLOBServerAction into your ResourceAction, then you could transparently serve images from
Re: [OT] Re: JSP under /WEB-INF folder PROTOCOL PAGES (ProtocolPages)
Dakota Jack wrote: app server = (AS) struts server = (SS) req = request -- = pass res = response You lost me here already... What's the difference between the app server and the struts server? Isn't Struts running IN your app server? With ResourceAction ___ First case HTML = req (AS) res (AS) = 2 Second image JPEG (say) = req (AS) -- res (SS) = 3 . Tenth image JPEG (say) = req (AS) -- res (SS) = 3 WIthout ResourceAction ___ First case HTML = req (AS) res (AS) = 2 First image JPEG (say) = req (AS) res (AS) = 2 Second image JPEG (say) = req (AS) res (AS) = 2 . Tenth image JPEG (say) = req (AS) res (AS) = 2 This is 22 versus 32. Apparently you forgot (I think?) that the app server has to handle ten images too. They don't just go out with the page, although we are looking at this in a very oversimplified sense. I don't see how you got 22 OR 32! :) The first request from the client is for the HTML document, right? So that's one request. The browser then sees ten img tags, regardless of what they point to. So for each one it makes a request. That's 10 requests, right? So it's 11 in all from the client to the server (ignoring for the moment whether server means app server alone or web server in front of app server, or whatever other configuration you might dream up). The only different between the two approaches we've been discussing is what on the server is going to handle each of those 11 requests... Is it a web server sending back a static HTML page for the first request, and then an image for each of the subsequent 10 image requests, or is it a web server returning the HTML page and then an app server returning the images, or an app server returning the page AND the images? There is no question that the AS is quicker with HTML than the SS, but I am not so sure about the images. The SS may be faster. There is lots of room here for tuning. Let me ask you this question... If you are accessing a web site, and you connect directly to the Internet, is that, ignoring things like caching and such, generally going to be faster than going through a proxy? I'd hope you would say yes. Now, clearly, if the proxy is doing caching and/or other optimizations, it might turn out to be faster, but that further proves my point: the web server is like the proxy in this example. -- Frank W. Zammetti Founder and Chief Software Architect Omnytex Technologies http://www.omnytex.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[VOTE][RESULT] Tomcat 5.5.7 Stability
The Apache Jakarta Tomcat team is proud to announce that Tomcat 5.5.7 has been voted stable after substantial evaluation and testing. The vote thread is archived at http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11067421773r=1w=2 among other places. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] Re: JSP under /WEB-INF folder PROTOCOL PAGES (ProtocolPages)
snip I think that the ResourceAction class actually acts as the web server and that is why the return is null. The class writes to the responses output stream and that is all the server does, right? I thought so too at first, but upon further reflection I'm not so sure... If a request comes in to the web server and then it forwards it on to the app server, that would mean at some very low level that the web server was passing along the connection to the app server... I'm not so sure it's anything that complex... It may be that the app server renders the response stream, but then passes it back to the web server to return to the client. The bottom line though is that we're talking a level low enough that I don't know the answer for sure. /snip I am certain on this one, because you can do this sort of thing *without* the web or app servers at all. I do this fairly frequently with code not unlike and heavily borrowing in principle from Jason Hunters HttpMessage and HttpsMessage in COS. The ResourceAction sends the response and ends the whole process by returning null. snip I too await the data :) But, I think you'd have to agree that for your approach to wind up being faster, much like when Java programs are faster than C programs, it must be due to some hidden optimization going on. I mean, on an operation-per-operation basis, C will ALWAYS beat Java... /snip Well, maybe on on an operation basis. An operation by any other name is still an operation. However, I don't disagree and would merely quibble about the language and the description. snip Simply put, there will always be less machine code ops going on with a C program at the lowest levels (assuming they algorithmically equivalent) than a Java program. /snip Well put! Yes! snip But, because a Java program can be optimized at runtime, that's where the speed gains occur that you can't get with C. /snip At the very least this is a main place to gain speed: the Tortoise and the Hare come to mind. snip ceteris paribus /snip Heh, I meant to tell you last time, this is Latin, not Greek. LOL ///;-) www.m-w.com Main Entry: ce·te·ris pa·ri·bus Pronunciation: 'kA-tr-s-'par--bs, 'ke-, 'se- Function: adverb Etymology: New Latin, other things being equal : if all other relevant things, factors, or elements remain unaltered snip But now your pushing those caching decisions back on the browser, right? I thought one of your basic premises was to not trust the browser to construct URLs and such? Wouldn't you have the same distrust for caching? (and probably worse since that is at least at the users' discrection) /snip The answers are no, yes, no. Setting caching in the response object is not equivalent to setting caching in the meta tags. This is why the ResourceAction has an edge. Note also that the setting of cache, pragma and expires are runtime alterable, and can override the meta tags, in ResourceAction. I left those decisions out of the code I sent you. Did you notice where I added in it response to someone's query on that? snip Granted, some additional flexibility might outweigh any problems. If you rolled my BLOBServerAction into your ResourceAction, then you could transparently serve images from WEB-INF *or* a database, transparently to the user and front-end. That's a nice bit of flexibility to be sure. /snip And, if you imagined more radical uses of images for whole pages, etc., then you might start thinking about BufferedImages cached in sessions, etc. snip I leave the leg-work to you :) /snip You got it! Jack -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~ You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep. ~Native Proverb~ Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary for eagles to be crows. We are poor . . . but we are free. ~Hunkesni (Sitting Bull), Hunkpapa Sioux~ This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] Re: JSP under /WEB-INF folder PROTOCOL PAGES (ProtocolPages)
Too late when I sent this. Let me make the necessary alterations to the nomenclature. Sorry! web server = df. (WS) app server = df. (AS) request= df. req response = df. res = df. passing the control With ResourceAction 1.0 WS req WS res HTML [2] 1.1 WS req AS res [3] 1.2 WS req AS res [3] 1.3 WS req AS res [3] 1.4 WS req AS res [3] 1.5 WS req AS res [3] 1.6 WS req AS res [3] 1.7 WS req AS res [3] 1.8 WS req AS res [3] 1.9 WS req AS res [3] 1.10 WS req AS res [3] Total 32 Without ResourceAction 1.0 WS req WS res HTML [2] 1.1 WS req AS res [2] 1.2 WS req AS res [2] 1.3 WS req AS res [2] 1.4 WS req AS res [2] 1.5 WS req AS res [2] 1.6 WS req AS res [2] 1.7 WS req AS res [2] 1.8 WS req AS res [2] 1.9 WS req AS res [2] 1.10 WS req AS res [2] Total 22 However, let me note, once again, that we can make it 22 to 22 by simply sending the attributes that are relevant back to a different server. For example, we could have img src='http://blahblahblah.com/ResourceAction.do?file=whatever.gif' Doing this, if we are talking about serving images to a large-scale site, we could get rid of both the WS and the AS and use a SCS (small custom server) optimized for this situation. I do this sort of thing constantly, *sub rosa*, on my sites. This is probably quicker than using WS to serve the images, and certainly so if the images are in any way dynamic in nature and if we make use of the multithreading opportunities that crop up in this situation. But, this is going afield. And, this is only looking at the upside too. Jack -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~ You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep. ~Native Proverb~ Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary for eagles to be crows. We are poor . . . but we are free. ~Hunkesni (Sitting Bull), Hunkpapa Sioux~ This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] Re: JSP under /WEB-INF folder PROTOCOL PAGES (ProtocolPages)
Dakota Jack wrote: I am certain on this one, because you can do this sort of thing *without* the web or app servers at all. I do this fairly frequently with code not unlike and heavily borrowing in principle from Jason Hunters HttpMessage and HttpsMessage in COS. The ResourceAction sends the response and ends the whole process by returning null. I agree, obviously you can take Tomcat for instance and use it to serve everything... I have a production app that is a single server running Tomcat and Oracle and that's it, no web server anywhere, everything is served from Tomcat whether it's a JSP, an image, an HTML document or whatever else. The question that's in my mind though is what happens when you have a web server in front of Tomcat? Just rendering to the response in a servlet might not be enough in that case... Think of a proxy analogy... Does the web server almost appear like a proxy? In other words, a request comes in to the web server, does it (a) pass the connection to the app server to fulfill, at which point it's done and can service more requests, or (b) does it ask the app server for the resource, whatever it is, wait for the response from the app server and send it along to the client when the app server is done responding? Same idea as a network proxy. The point being, just because the app server CAN serve everything, doesn't necasserily mean it WILL with a web server in front. But again, I don't know the answer here, it's just a question in my mind. ceteris paribus /snip Heh, I meant to tell you last time, this is Latin, not Greek. LOL ///;-) Really?? Well, I have something to yell at my Macroeconomics professor for then! I know for sure she said it was Greek! :) Funny aside... My Macroeconomics professor... her last name, and I couldn't have made this up, is Economopolous. That just rules! But now your pushing those caching decisions back on the browser, right? I thought one of your basic premises was to not trust the browser to construct URLs and such? Wouldn't you have the same distrust for caching? (and probably worse since that is at least at the users' discrection) /snip The answers are no, yes, no. Setting caching in the response object is not equivalent to setting caching in the meta tags. This is why the ResourceAction has an edge. Note also that the setting of cache, pragma and expires are runtime alterable, and can override the meta tags, in ResourceAction. I left those decisions out of the code I sent you. Did you notice where I added in it response to someone's query on that? I did notice, but my point is that the browser settings would override any tags or headers you set. I might be wrong about that, but that would be my expectation. After all, what good is a setting in my browser that says don't cache anything if a web site designer can come along and overrule that? Surely the FOSS community would be up in arms over their loss of freedom, right?!? ;) -- Frank W. Zammetti Founder and Chief Software Architect Omnytex Technologies http://www.omnytex.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] Re: JSP under /WEB-INF folder PROTOCOL PAGES (ProtocolPages)
I still don't understanding the 32 and 22... What do the [2] and [3]'s represent? Dakota Jack wrote: Too late when I sent this. Let me make the necessary alterations to the nomenclature. Sorry! web server = df. (WS) app server = df. (AS) request= df. req response = df. res = df. passing the control With ResourceAction 1.0 WS req WS res HTML [2] 1.1 WS req AS res [3] 1.2 WS req AS res [3] 1.3 WS req AS res [3] 1.4 WS req AS res [3] 1.5 WS req AS res [3] 1.6 WS req AS res [3] 1.7 WS req AS res [3] 1.8 WS req AS res [3] 1.9 WS req AS res [3] 1.10 WS req AS res [3] Total 32 Without ResourceAction 1.0 WS req WS res HTML [2] 1.1 WS req AS res [2] 1.2 WS req AS res [2] 1.3 WS req AS res [2] 1.4 WS req AS res [2] 1.5 WS req AS res [2] 1.6 WS req AS res [2] 1.7 WS req AS res [2] 1.8 WS req AS res [2] 1.9 WS req AS res [2] 1.10 WS req AS res [2] Total 22 However, let me note, once again, that we can make it 22 to 22 by simply sending the attributes that are relevant back to a different server. For example, we could have img src='http://blahblahblah.com/ResourceAction.do?file=whatever.gif' Doing this, if we are talking about serving images to a large-scale site, we could get rid of both the WS and the AS and use a SCS (small custom server) optimized for this situation. I do this sort of thing constantly, *sub rosa*, on my sites. This is probably quicker than using WS to serve the images, and certainly so if the images are in any way dynamic in nature and if we make use of the multithreading opportunities that crop up in this situation. But, this is going afield. And, this is only looking at the upside too. Jack If we are talking about dynamically-created resources, then I would tend to agree with your view. But we have, at least as far as I was concerned, been talking about strictly static resources. In that case, your basic premise boils down to, as I see it: An app server running ResourceAction can serve resources more efficiently than a web server. Again, strictly talking about static resources, I would be absolutely SCHOCKED to learn this is the case under most circumstances. That would be like saying a Cadillac could beat a NASCAR vehicle in 1 ten-lap race... It might be able to under some circumstances, like the NASCAR driver being drunk!, and certainly there are some very nice trade-offs to driving the Caddy like more room and a better stereo, but in general you wouldn't expect the Caddy to lose. A bit of hyperbole there, but the underlying point is what's important. -- Frank W. Zammetti Founder and Chief Software Architect Omnytex Technologies http://www.omnytex.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] Re: JSP under /WEB-INF folder PROTOCOL PAGES (ProtocolPages)
snip The question that's in my mind though is what happens when you have a web server in front of Tomcat? Just rendering to the response in a servlet might not be enough in that case... /snip *Before* ResourceAction returns null, the response output stream has been written, flushed, and closed. The only thing that the app server or the web server have left to deal with is that null. There is no wrapper in this case and no proxy in the sense you are talking. The OutputStream from an HttpResponse object writes to the client. snip The point being, just because the app server CAN serve everything, doesn't necasserily mean it WILL with a web server in front. /snip But, in this case, the OutputStream does and there is no pass it on functionality in there that would incorporate any reference or use of the web or app server. The fact that this OutputStream ends the process might be one of the factors favoring ResourceAction. snip ceteris paribus /snip Heh, I meant to tell you last time, this is Latin, not Greek. LOL ///;-) Really?? Well, I have something to yell at my Macroeconomics professor for then! I know for sure she said it was Greek! :) Funny aside... My Macroeconomics professor... her last name, and I couldn't have made this up, is Economopolous. That just rules! /snip LOL Economopolous! Hilarious Remember My Big Fat Greek Wedding where the Greek guy has a way of turning everything to Greek history, etc.? Well, Ms. Economopolous is clearly Greek and her name is Economic-city. (Plato's Republic was really Politia which means The City. Republic comes from Republica which was a Latin translation.) Anyway, this is ALL ceteris paribus. (You can tell Latin from the endings, ibus is the dative plural.) snip I did notice, but my point is that the browser settings would override any tags or headers you set. I might be wrong about that, but that would be my expectation. After all, what good is a setting in my browser that says don't cache anything if a web site designer can come along and overrule that? Surely the FOSS community would be up in arms over their loss of freedom, right?!? ;) /snip The good is that the web site designer knows when a change has been made and the assumption is that you are going to see what the web site designer has to offer. No? Jack -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~ You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep. ~Native Proverb~ Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary for eagles to be crows. We are poor . . . but we are free. ~Hunkesni (Sitting Bull), Hunkpapa Sioux~ This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] Re: JSP under /WEB-INF folder PROTOCOL PAGES (ProtocolPages)
snip On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 14:11:24 -0500, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I still don't understanding the 32 and 22... What do the [2] and [3]'s represent? /snip A total of three possible processes (1) getting the request; (2) passing the request to another server; (3) handling the response. If you have them all, you have a three. If only 1 and 3, then you have a two. snip If we are talking about dynamically-created resources, then I would tend to agree with your view. But we have, at least as far as I was concerned, been talking about strictly static resources. /snip If there are static resources, then we can get it down to 22 versus 22 by sending the images to a separate server. Not only can we do this, but we can send the images to a super efficient separate server if we are talking about static images only. snip An app server running ResourceAction can serve resources more efficiently than a web server. /snip Not that an app server is faster under any circumstances tha a web server. That really is not close to true. I've seen the stats on that one and I would doubt that they will ever be the same or close to the same. I would be as SCHOCKED as you (is this an Italian-Jewish SHOCKED? ///;-) ) in that case. What I am talking about is a custom server for images which gets rid of a LOT of baggage, including WEB-INF but having the same protections as being under WEB-INF. snip Again, strictly talking about static resources, I would be absolutely SCHOCKED to learn this is the case under most circumstances. That would be like saying a Cadillac could beat a NASCAR vehicle in 1 ten-lap race... It might be able to under some circumstances, like the NASCAR driver being drunk!, and certainly there are some very nice trade-offs to driving the Caddy like more room and a better stereo, but in general you wouldn't expect the Caddy to lose. /snip In this case the analogy, IF apt, is the reverse. The custom server is the NASCAR. All the doodads needed on an app or a web server can be pealed off and serious savings with multithreading, parsing presumptions, etc. can be realized. snip A bit of hyperbole there, but the underlying point is what's important. /snip I enjoyed the ride in the caddy. Had the stereo on a good jazz station in my mind with Lead Belly growling at me. The metaphor is apt but really, when you are talking a mini-quick-custom server, reversed. I am actually surprised that there are not more of these little speedy and specialized servers around. Jack This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Catalina Log File - Coyote can't register jmx for protocol
Below is all I see in catalina_log.2005-01-29.txt file: 2005-01-29 23:03:39 CoyoteConnector Coyote can't register jmx for protocol. I'm using win98, jdk1.4.2. Tomcat 4.1. --- Caldarale, Charles R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whatever error or stack trace you were trying to include didn't make it through to the list. Also, please tell us what version of Tomcat you're using, which JDK, which OS, etc. - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Trouble with XSL transforms with JSP
The error message you are getting I haven't seen before, but it seems that you have some text before the root element of your document. This would be outside of the ? .. ? elements. Personally, I wrote a java class to do my XSL transforms. My JSPs call them, so other than that there is nothing XSLT in the JSPs themselves. The alternative is to use JSTL tags to do XSLT, which I have avoided by doing this. Regards, A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have played with several versions of Tomcat, but now I have decided to study JSP in earnest and I downloaded the latest release two days ago. I have also upgraded my Java installation. The installation went relatively well and Tomcat is running on my machine. I decided to start with something I know about, so I am attempting to transform an XML document to an HTML page via JSP. For a sanity check, I have downloaded O'Reilly's source code from JavaServer Pages, 3rd edition. Specifically, chapter 15 has an example of what I wish to do. The example works flawlessly, but my transform coughs up this error message. ... org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Content is not allowed in prolog. I have researched this to some degree and found that this class sometimes gags on UTF-8 files. I checked my XML document in the Hex view of my editor and saw that there indeed were two bytes at the beginning of the file that were suggested as the source of my problem. So I wrote an XSLT identity transform stylesheet that reproduces the document while changing the encoding from UTF-8 to ISO-8859-1. After running the transform of my XML document I checked it in the Hex view of my editor and the encoding appears now to be ISO-8859-1. I re-wrote my stylesheet so that its output encoding is ISO-8859-1 now also. Nonetheless, I still get the same exception message when I attempt the transform. Does anyone know of a cookbook approach or checklist I can use to get over this hump? Thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Edit session timeout
Hello! How to edit session timeout? Tomcat's default value is 30mins... 30 minutes of inactivity then a session will expire... In my apps, i think 30minutes is too long.. i want 5 minutes of inactivity before session expires... is it in server.xml? i only see connectionTimeout which is 2? is connectionTimeout the same with sessionTimeout? Thanks and regards, Aris mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Failed JDBC connection hangs Tomcat
The JTDS driver can cause the hanging you described - this has occured in a test we did on Win 2k, SQL Server 2k, 1.5 JDK. reagrds, Hari Mailvaganam On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 08:39:50 +0200, Igor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have the same problem, that described in http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg58799.html There is ServletContextListener in our application, that schedule two tasks for repeated fixed rate execution on context initialization (Timer.scheduleAtFixedRate). First task is executed every minute. It queries MS SQL server, second task is executed every hour. If MS SQL server goes down, first task tries to use connection to database. After this Tomcat may hang: when user tries to download a page, he or her will wait for a long time (more that 1 day). At the same time second taks (that is executed every hour) works as it was expected: there are corresponding entries in log file. First task is executed in separate thread, and I do not understand how can it hang whole tomcat (at least one context). We use JDK 1.5, tomcat 5.0.28. The same problem was on 1.4.2. Both for MS and JTDS drivers :-( Does somebody know how can I prevent tomcat from hang in such situations? Thank you in advance, Igor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Running Tomcat as service
Hi, I've been running (an older) version of Tomcat (4.1.31) on a test Windows 2000 system for awhile as an application, and this weekend, I wanted to try to run it as a service, so I downloaded and ran the .EXE version from www.apache.org. The installation seemed to go ok, but whenever the service starts, I am having a problem... I am seeing an error Exception in cleanup after start failed. From what I can tell, this is happening when Tomcat is trying to deploy the examples. I've been doing some searching on this, and although I didn't find anything specific to it, I did find some hints, and I tried deleteing the context for examples in the server.xml file. After I did that, and restarted the Tomcat service, it looks like it came up without errors, but of course, I don't have the examples anymore. This is all right, I guess, but I'm just curious as to why this occurred, and if there was another resolution other than completely deleting the context? I think that I am also noticing that when Tomcat is run as a service (on Windows 2000, at least), it seems to run a lot slower than when I ran it as an application. Is this normal, and is there anything that I can do to tune the service configuration to improve its performance? Thanks in advance, Jim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] Re: JSP under /WEB-INF folder PROTOCOL PAGES (ProtocolPages)
Dakota Jack wrote: The good is that the web site designer knows when a change has been made and the assumption is that you are going to see what the web site designer has to offer. No? Jack I concur with the assumption, but I don't see it making any difference... Remember that what we affectionately refer to as the web these days is really a lot more than what it was originally. One of the things that was originally intended is that the client is in complete control. If the user wants to request a resource from a server, and they tell their browser via a setting that no, I WANT you to go ask that server EVERY SINGLE TIME for the resources, NEVER use what you might have in the local cache, then they should be allowed to do that, and whatever the web site creator wants you to do is irrelevant. Same idea when the user can override fonts and colors and the like with their own local settings. Nowadays though, us web app/site designers think WE know how best a client should view our site, and we actually go out of our way to make it so... how many times have you visited a site where the font is too small and the usual font size adjustments don't make any difference? So you have to go in to setting and uncheck that User Font Sizes Specified By Site option. Annoying, and not what was originally intended. This is of course all only relevant to the extent that it supports my point, that anything you do on the server side to try and control caching is either (a) useless because the end user can override it anyway or (b) not in keeping with the spirit of the web, at least, not as originally intended. Now I'm off on a bit of a tangent though :) -- Frank W. Zammetti Founder and Chief Software Architect Omnytex Technologies http://www.omnytex.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Edit session timeout
From: Aris Javier [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to edit session timeout? Tomcat's default value is 30mins... Look in web.xml instead of server.xml. You can change it for the entire container, or on a per-webapp basis, depending on which web.xml you edit. (Works for Tomcat 4.1, I haven't moved to 5 yet...) -- Wendy Smoak - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Edit session timeout
I looked at my web.xml, and no sessionTimeout found there... can you give me an example on how to write it down in web.xml? thanks! aris -Original Message- From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 12:25 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Edit session timeout From: Aris Javier [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to edit session timeout? Tomcat's default value is 30mins... Look in web.xml instead of server.xml. You can change it for the entire container, or on a per-webapp basis, depending on which web.xml you edit. (Works for Tomcat 4.1, I haven't moved to 5 yet...) -- Wendy Smoak - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Edit session timeout
From: Aris Javier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Edit session timeout I looked at my web.xml, and no sessionTimeout found there... can you give me an example on how to write it down in web.xml? Not sure what you meant by my web.xml, since, as Wendy noted, there's a global one in the conf directory, as well as one in the WEB-INF directory of each web app. The session timeout is usually in the global one, but can be overridden in each web app if needed. - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Edit session timeout
session-config session-timeout120/session-timeout /session-config Look, at the web.xml file inside the conf directory, the global web.xml file that is. You can usually find this right above the mime-type mapping definitions. Drew. On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 20:28, Aris Javier wrote: I looked at my web.xml, and no sessionTimeout found there... can you give me an example on how to write it down in web.xml? thanks! aris -Original Message- From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 12:25 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Edit session timeout From: Aris Javier [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to edit session timeout? Tomcat's default value is 30mins... Look in web.xml instead of server.xml. You can change it for the entire container, or on a per-webapp basis, depending on which web.xml you edit. (Works for Tomcat 4.1, I haven't moved to 5 yet...) -- Wendy Smoak - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Edit session timeout
Thanks Drew! I found it.. =) can I also use this setting per web app? by editing web.xml per web app? -Original Message- From: Drew Jorgenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 12:41 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Edit session timeout session-config session-timeout120/session-timeout /session-config Look, at the web.xml file inside the conf directory, the global web.xml file that is. You can usually find this right above the mime-type mapping definitions. Drew. On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 20:28, Aris Javier wrote: I looked at my web.xml, and no sessionTimeout found there... can you give me an example on how to write it down in web.xml? thanks! aris -Original Message- From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 12:25 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Edit session timeout From: Aris Javier [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to edit session timeout? Tomcat's default value is 30mins... Look in web.xml instead of server.xml. You can change it for the entire container, or on a per-webapp basis, depending on which web.xml you edit. (Works for Tomcat 4.1, I haven't moved to 5 yet...) -- Wendy Smoak - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Edit session timeout
Yes. Doug - Original Message - From: Aris Javier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 11:53 PM Subject: RE: Edit session timeout Thanks Drew! I found it.. =) can I also use this setting per web app? by editing web.xml per web app? -Original Message- From: Drew Jorgenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 12:41 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Edit session timeout session-config session-timeout120/session-timeout /session-config Look, at the web.xml file inside the conf directory, the global web.xml file that is. You can usually find this right above the mime-type mapping definitions. Drew. On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 20:28, Aris Javier wrote: I looked at my web.xml, and no sessionTimeout found there... can you give me an example on how to write it down in web.xml? thanks! aris -Original Message- From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 12:25 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Edit session timeout From: Aris Javier [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to edit session timeout? Tomcat's default value is 30mins... Look in web.xml instead of server.xml. You can change it for the entire container, or on a per-webapp basis, depending on which web.xml you edit. (Works for Tomcat 4.1, I haven't moved to 5 yet...) -- Wendy Smoak - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Edit session timeout
Thanks Everybody! =) -Original Message- From: Parsons Technical Services [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 12:56 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Edit session timeout Yes. Doug - Original Message - From: Aris Javier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 11:53 PM Subject: RE: Edit session timeout Thanks Drew! I found it.. =) can I also use this setting per web app? by editing web.xml per web app? -Original Message- From: Drew Jorgenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 12:41 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Edit session timeout session-config session-timeout120/session-timeout /session-config Look, at the web.xml file inside the conf directory, the global web.xml file that is. You can usually find this right above the mime-type mapping definitions. Drew. On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 20:28, Aris Javier wrote: I looked at my web.xml, and no sessionTimeout found there... can you give me an example on how to write it down in web.xml? thanks! aris -Original Message- From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 12:25 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Edit session timeout From: Aris Javier [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to edit session timeout? Tomcat's default value is 30mins... Look in web.xml instead of server.xml. You can change it for the entire container, or on a per-webapp basis, depending on which web.xml you edit. (Works for Tomcat 4.1, I haven't moved to 5 yet...) -- Wendy Smoak - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache-Coyote/1.1 application configuration
We are having some problems with the configuration of an Apache-Coyote/1.1 server and the installaition of a Broadband Speed test from Visualware http://myspeed.visualware.com/faq.html http://myspeed.visualware.com/faq.html Over 50% of users are experiencing an error when the 'Upload' test tries to work. After a long dialogue between the hosting company ( http://www.easyspeedy.com/products/os.html http://www.easyspeedy.com/products/os.html) and Visualware ( outbind://8/www.visualware.com www.visualware.com) the following conclusion was drawn (by Easyspeedy..) After reading all the mails and looked at VisualWare's website/Faq my conclusion is that your problem is NOT a application problem (speedtest application) NOR a EasySpeedy operating system fault. Just to be clear - we have used the words error/fault. There is no errors or faults as such. It is all a matter of application configuration. The application there need to be configured is the Apache Webserver We are looking for someone who can help solve this problem and other maintenance issues. If you can help, please let us know. Thanks, Paul Denham Tel +44 (0)870 382 5008 Fax +44 (0)870 382 5009 26-28 Hammersmith Grove London W6 7BA Paul Denham onestopclick Technology Brokers Tel 0870 382 5008 Fax 0870 382 5009 www.onestopclick.com http://www.onestopclick.com/ 26-28 Hammersmith Grove London W6 7BA -- Help others make the right decision... Tell us about your Service http://www.onestopclick.com/survey/feedback.asp?ID=10487397333 Provider http://www.onestopclick.com/survey/feedback.asp?ID=10487397333
