with dozens, sometimes hundreds of Apache processes that are hung by
tomcat. This results in memory usages exceeding 2gb!
Has anyone experienced similar problems or have any suggestions?
-Sean Finkel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
What kernel was running on the old box?
Better put, what is different between the two machines?
7.3 on the old system. 9.0 on an intermediary system, with only the
private instance installed (which never hung).
I recall RHEL 3.0 comes with an NPTL-based 2.4, which will require
setting
I recall RHEL 3.0 comes with an NPTL-based 2.4, which will require
setting LD_KERNEL_ASSUME=2.4 to disable the NPTL functionality for the
Java process. That may be it.
I am assuming you mean set this as an environment variable? I will
give this a try and see what happens! Thank you for the
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
Perhaps Tomcat standalone would be sufficient for your application
requirements?
No, because the user also wants access to PHP and other related Apache
features (htacces, mod_rewrite, etc).
-Sean
-
To
Sean Finkel wrote:
Hello,
First a brief background on the setup:
We are running Apache 1.3.31 utilizing mod_jk (not jk2). We are
running two instances of Tomcat. Previously, both were version 4.
Currently, we have one shared instance running the latest 5.x release
(just compiled yesterday). We
(Apache
hands *everything* off for this domain to Tomcat, including images):
And yet you said Tomcat standalone wasn't an option for this
installation? Too bad. You can do much of mod_rewrite with the
balancer app, you can do much of .htaccess with Servlet security
constraints, and if
Sorry, this is a shared server, and he wants his site available on port
80.
Tomcat standalone can run on port 80 without running as root by using
jsvc (from commons-daemon). There are examples and more information on
this configuration at
Maybe I am missing something, but wouldn't that not be able to bind to
port 80 since Apache is already bound to it? There is a lot about the
Java world I am not familiar with, so maybe it can...
You would need separate ip addresses for apache and tomcat.
Aye I figured as much
And
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
I already have. This exact same setup worked flawlessly under RH 7.3
and
RH 9.0
Actually, I meant a non-Linux platform. But even your results so far
suggest an RHEL-specific issue. Maybe try LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5
instead of 2.4? I remember people having
collision between IPTables and Tomcat?
As well, this setup worked flawlessly under RH 9.0 and RH 7.3.
Just looking for ideas here, as this honestly makes no sense to me.
thanks!
-Sean Finkel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
10 matches
Mail list logo
