Rainer Jung wrote:
The balanced workers behind lb1, lb2 etc. are allowed to have the same
name, because each load balancer has it's own list of balanced workers
with associated attributes. I expect no problem from a clash of names of
balanced workers in different balancing workers.
I must be mi
Guernsey, Byron (GE Consumer & Industrial) wrote:
I believe you can specify the jvmRoute separately by using the domain
attribute, but I'm not sure I see how this would help?
Byron
-Original Message-----
From: Mott Leroy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 11:
Due to some differences in our applications, some of them can be truly
load balanced, and some of them really cannot (yet). That is, some of
our applications can be (and have been) truly load balanced, and others
need (and only allow) simple failover support ("hot standby"). I noticed
that work
arge directory of WEB-INF/classes. It much easier to
manage them as jar files.
-Tim
Mott Leroy wrote:
This probably sounds like a very newbie question, but for your own
application classes, (not third party), is there any particular reason
to "jar" them and put them into "WEB-IN
This probably sounds like a very newbie question, but for your own
application classes, (not third party), is there any particular reason
to "jar" them and put them into "WEB-INF/lib" vs compiling them as class
files to "WEB-INF/classes"? The classloader won't blindly just load the
whole jar wi
.
I might have to gripe about doucmentation in a second (nother thread)..
Noah
Edgar Alves wrote:
Try adding these two lines to worker.properties:
worker.bl_worker_dev.domain=dev_alexis
worker.bl_worker_noah.domain=noah_alexis
-- Edgar Alves
Mott Leroy wrote:
Hi -
I'm unable to ge
Before I go gripe too, too much, let me just say that the mod_jk
documentation has improved immensely since I start looking into it. Some
of it might be simplied by the fact that I no longer consider jk2 in the
picture which seemed to be adding some confusion.
I don't know who is responsible f
:
worker.bl_worker_dev.domain=dev_alexis
worker.bl_worker_noah.domain=noah_alexis
-- Edgar Alves
Mott Leroy wrote:
Hi -
I'm unable to get mod_jk load balancing working. The usual mod_jk
setup works just fine, but using a load balancing worker however, is
not. [Oddly, my webserver crashed d
Hi -
I'm unable to get mod_jk load balancing working. The usual mod_jk setup
works just fine, but using a load balancing worker however, is not.
[Oddly, my webserver crashed during testing of this, but that could very
well be unrelated]
The problem is with user sessions. The instances (nodes
See -
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.5-doc/manager-howto.html#Configuring%20Manager%20Application%20Access
From what I remember, admin access follows that same rules as manager
app access, so the instructions on that page are the same except the
"role" should be "admin" not "manager".
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/config/context.html -
see the "allowLinking" property.
As far as how to create the symlink when the app is deployed, not sure
beyond running some sort of script when the application loads (using a
context listener perhaps).
Matt Galvin wrote:
Hi Al
I wasn't able to find this particular error when I did a search, so I
thought I'd post here in case someone has a similar problem.
I was having an error when remotely deploying an application (tomcat
5.0.28) using the tomcat manager (via Ant tasks). I did not explicitly
define a context.xml fil
12 matches
Mail list logo
