Sorry, I am out of ideas. I don't see that behavior on my Redhat servers at
all.
John
-Original Message-
From: David Wynter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 6:51 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: New Release JK 1.2.0 not installing
I tried
All due respect to the RPM managers, but I honestly, truly feel that you can
get up and running much quicker without using RPMs, and just using the
Tomcat binary install and a connector binary. I'm not bragging, but I can
do a Tomcat+connector install on RedHat now almost quicker than an RPM
You should use rpm for Apache 2.0.42 only if you got such rpm.
They are available at :
http://ftp.falsehope.com/home/gomez/apache2/
You could use the source rpm to rebuild it on your MDK box.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
RPM is a good solution when you need package, ie when you have
to clone configuration on site with many boxes.
the mod_jk 1.2.0 rpms also setup httpd.conf and that's
important for newbies and beginers.
Experienced users could still use the good old configure/make
system :
./configure
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: New Release JK 1.2.0 not installing
All due respect to the RPM managers, but I honestly, truly feel that you can
get up and running much quicker without using RPMs, and just using the
Tomcat binary install and a connector binary. I'm not bragging, but I can
do
-Original Message-
From: David Wynter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 12:20 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: New Release JK 1.2.0 not installing
Thanks,
As it turned out I ignored the dependency and installed. What
I note is that
RPMs are very useful
) 7879 605 706 M.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 September 2002 17:34
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: New Release JK 1.2.0 not installing
Post server.xml, workers.properties (or jk2.properties), and mod_jk.conf
:06 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: New Release JK 1.2.0 not installing
OK, they are all reproduced here, I have not tried to change
them because I
am stumped. Based on what I have read the config file s'look' right.
I have Apache running on port 80 but when I try to use
-
From: David Wynter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 12:06 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: New Release JK 1.2.0 not installing
OK, they are all reproduced here, I have not tried to change them because I
am stumped. Based on what I have read the config file
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: New Release JK 1.2.0 not installing
David,
You are all over the place...do you have a specific idea of what you are
trying to do?
Are you trying to integrate apache and tomcat? Do you want to send http
requests directly to tomcat?
Why are you using both ajp12
Wynter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: New Release JK 1.2.0 not installing
OK,
I made the changes you and John suggested. I had put in a
connector for port
8007 because I had it before with Apache 1.3.23, but now
, 2002 1:00 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: New Release JK 1.2.0 not installing
OK,
I made the changes you and John suggested. I had put in a connector for port
8007 because I had it before with Apache 1.3.23, but now realise it was
associated with ajp12 and is not needed. And yes the rest
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: New Release JK 1.2.0 not installing
David,
You keep talking about running Tomcat on port 8080. It is
important to
understand that in your (requested) configuration, tomcat is
not running on
port 8080. The only connector you should have defined for
Tomcat
-Original Message-
From: David Wynter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: New Release JK 1.2.0 not installing
OK,
I made the changes you and John suggested. I had put in a
connector for port
8007 because I had it before
Wynter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 2:31 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: New Release JK 1.2.0 not installing
Hi John,
I get identical results using startup.sh as root followed by
shutdown.sh as
root as I do with service tomcat4 start etc.. Same socket
earlier suggestion.
Thanks
David
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 September 2002 19:34
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: New Release JK 1.2.0 not installing
OK. I'm not sure I can comment any more, because I am fairly confused. I
don't
19:34
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: New Release JK 1.2.0 not installing
OK. I'm not sure I can comment any more, because I am fairly confused. I
don't understand what you want to do...in your last message you mentioned
accessing your app on port 8080, yet we are jumping through hoops
PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 September 2002 19:34
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: New Release JK 1.2.0 not installing
OK. I'm not sure I can comment any more, because I am fairly
confused. I
don't understand what you want to do...in your last message
you mentioned
accessing your app on port
tomorrow.
David
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 September 2002 21:02
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: New Release JK 1.2.0 not installing
#1 Yes, that's correct.
#2 the down and dirty way would be to put an index.html file
22:21
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: New Release JK 1.2.0 not installing
Hi John,
I no longer get the error on Tomcat startup/shutdown. My guess is that when
I moved the binaries and jar files across after building the connectors
where apxs was not available caused the problem with my Tomcat
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: New Release JK 1.2.0 not installing
Well in server.xml I changed the localhost strings to www.roamware.com
(that is in the Engine setting and the Host setting) and I changed the
Context from ROOT to /rwsite. now I have the connection refused and when
I shutdown I get
21 matches
Mail list logo
