00:27
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk2 Ready/Recommended For Production?
Boy am I confused now. If mod_jk2 is dead, so what is everyone using?
Still using just the first mod_jk? I had just gotten everythign working
with mod_jk2 - more or less- but configurationwise mod_jk2 is a pain since
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Peng Tuck Kwok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_jk2 Ready/Recommended For Production?
Do you really need to put apache in front of tomcat ? Standalone
tomcat
PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Peng Tuck Kwok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_jk2 Ready/Recommended For Production?
Do you really need to put apache in front of tomcat ? Standalone
tomcat
On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 05:56, Antony Paul wrote:
Do you mean Apache dont have any security holes. I dont know about
hacking a system. But in terms of security Tomcat is far better than
Apache since it dont have any security vulnerabilities.
But if you run tomcat standalone, you have to run
: mod_jk2 Ready/Recommended For Production?
On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 05:56, Antony Paul wrote:
Do you mean Apache dont have any security holes. I dont know about
hacking a system. But in terms of security Tomcat is far better than
Apache since it dont have any security vulnerabilities.
But if you
, 2004 9:58 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk2 Ready/Recommended For Production?
On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 05:56, Antony Paul wrote:
Do you mean Apache dont have any security holes. I dont know about
hacking a system. But in terms of security Tomcat is far better than
Apache since
. It is working great for me on a rather busy
little cluster of servers.
--Angus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 7:27 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk2 Ready/Recommended For Production?
Boy am I
Ready/Recommended For Production?
Do you really need to put apache in front of tomcat ? Standalone
tomcat (since ver 4.x)
has always been pretty good in terms of performance
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 22:07:34 -0400, Mike Millson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Tomcat FAQ page still says
Run it as a daemon then you can run it as a non root user with permissions on port 80
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 October 2004 15:20
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: mod_jk2 Ready/Recommended For Production?
Yes for static, but what
. It is working great for me on a rather busy
little cluster of servers.
--Angus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 7:27 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk2 Ready/Recommended For Production?
Boy am
mod_auth_mysql and JDBC
for centralized authentication (is this even possible?).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 2:27 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: mod_jk2 Ready/Recommended For Production?
I have been using mod_jk2
From the tomcat-devel list:
So is JK2 dead because of proxy_ajp? Why doesn't JK2 just replace JK?
JK2 is dead because (like mod_webapp before it :), it failed to attract a
community interested in maintaining it. You might as well ask 'why doesn't
mod_webapp just replace JK?'
For some reason the
On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 13:42, Joseph Shraibman wrote:
From the tomcat-devel list:
So is JK2 dead because of proxy_ajp? Why doesn't JK2 just replace JK?
Ah, I see. This message from tomcat-devel shows the JK ToDo list:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg63908.html
It is
Boy am I confused now. If mod_jk2 is dead, so what is everyone using?
Still using just the first mod_jk? I had just gotten everythign working
with mod_jk2 - more or less- but configurationwise mod_jk2 is a pain since
the syntax was completely changed and requires you to map every nook and
cranny.
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 10:07:34PM -0400, Mike Millson wrote:
: The Tomcat FAQ page still says that mod_jk is great and should be used
: for production and mod_jk2 may not be production worthy for everyone.
: [snip]
: Is this still accurate, or is mod_jk2 now ready/recommended for
: production?
Do you really need to put apache in front of tomcat ? Standalone
tomcat (since ver 4.x)
has always been pretty good in terms of performance
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 22:07:34 -0400, Mike Millson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Tomcat FAQ page still says that mod_jk is great and should be used
for
16 matches
Mail list logo
