Yah I missed that one. thanks
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Einfeldt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 3:50 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: session affinity with loadbalancing (apache2, mod_jk,
tomcat5 on linux 9, jdk1.4.2)
Did you set the jvmRoute
I've read in the Workers How To of apache that the property
sticky_session for lb worker properties enables / disables session
affinity for the load balancer. When I tried it on my system the session
doesn't seem to be retained often resulting to a session timed out or a
not logged in error. Below
'
Subject: session affinity with loadbalancing (apache2, mod_jk, tomcat5
on linux 9, jdk1.4.2)
I've read in the Workers How To of apache that the property
sticky_session for lb worker properties enables / disables session
affinity for the load balancer. When I tried it on my system
.
John Sidney-Woollett
ian said:
I've read in the Workers How To of apache that the property
sticky_session for lb worker properties enables / disables session
affinity for the load balancer. When I tried it on my system the session
doesn't seem to be retained often resulting to a session timed
Nachricht-
Von: Ralph Einfeldt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 8. März 2004 13:29
An: Tomcat Users List
Betreff: RE: IIS + Tomcat 4.1.x + Load Balancing with session
affinity (sticky sessions) possible ?
I can just answer one question of yours:
'How do these sticky sessions
Hi Group,
We got a small webfarm with 2 IIS JK on a WLBS balancer. Behind them are
two Tomcat workers on different machines. So we need Session affinity to
have the JK choose the right (same) Tomcat for the session.
Client (Browser)
||
WLBS
.
(The codebase of tc5 had some changes in the last weeks)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 12:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IIS + Tomcat 4.1.x + Load Balancing with session affinity
(sticky sessions) possible
Users List
Betreff: RE: IIS + Tomcat 4.1.x + Load Balancing with session
affinity (sticky sessions) possible ?
I don't know if your suggested solution works with IIS.
But what should work is a solution without sticky sessions.
(If that works for you depends on your application)
You can
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: IIS + Tomcat 4.1.x + Load Balancing with session affinity
(s ticky sessions) possible ?
Thanks, but that is exactly what I need to know.
We can't replicate sessions coz our crap Framework
. (Under mod_jk there is a mapping
between jvmroute and the name of the worker)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 1:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: IIS + Tomcat 4.1.x + Load Balancing with session affinity
(sticky
Hi all,
I have to raise this question because it may confuse a lot of us and the
right answer can clarify something very important:
Is session affinity and sticky session the same in apache + jk2 +
tomcat load balancing enviroment?
As I know, the sticky session means that: if you have many
session affinity==sticky sessions,
if you need session replication, try out http://cvs.apache.org/~fhanik/
Filip
- Original Message -
From: Dinh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 11:03 PM
Subject: Session affinity vs sticky
As I understand it, both terms are use for what you
call 'session affinity'. This is what mod_jk
supports.
The term for what you call 'sticky session' is AFAIK
session replication. This can also be used in tomcat:
http://www.filip.net/tomcat/
-Original Message-
From: Dinh Nguyen
I got two answers from Filip and Ralph. Basing on what Filip said, can I
think that no session replication in session affinity?
Tks for yours.
-Original Message-
From: Filip Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 2:11 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Session
correct
- Original Message -
From: Dinh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 11:47 PM
Subject: RE: Session affinity vs sticky session
I got two answers from Filip and Ralph. Basing on what Filip said, can I
think that no session
Filip, you are a man. Thank you very much.
Dinh.
-Original Message-
From: Filip Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 2:52 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Session affinity vs sticky session
correct
- Original Message -
From: Dinh Nguyen [EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 2:55 AM
Subject: RE: Session affinity doesn't work
This is my workers2.properties. I attached it to my last mail but the
mail server removed it. Sorry
Hi Klaus,
The jvmRoute of the second tomcat instance is tomcat2, I forgot to
said that in my first email. About the tomcatId, I modified my settings
as you said but now the load balancing no longer works. Only tomcat2
responses to my request.
Thank you anyway. Anyone have another idea? Thanks.
: Session affinity doesn't work
Hi Klaus,
The jvmRoute of the second tomcat instance is tomcat2, I forgot to
said that in my first email. About the tomcatId, I modified my settings
as you said but now the load balancing no longer works. Only tomcat2
responses to my request.
Thank you anyway. Anyone have
to
Engine name=Standalone defaultHost=localhost debug=0
jvmRoute=tomcat2
Klaus
- Original Message -
From: Dinh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 7:00 AM
Subject: Session affinity doesn't work
Hi all,
I have downloaded these following packages
with one exception: the session affinity doesn't work as expected.
Everytime I refresh my browser, it gives me a different session id. If
anyone experimented this problem, please help me.
These are my settings and modifications to apache and tomcat.
Apache httpd.conf
Hi,
I am trying to load balance between 2 Tomcat servers. But I cannot get
session
affinity to work. The first time I get a page from the browser, I would
receive a
page from one server. Then when I refresh (reload from browser) the page, I
would
get a page from the other tomcat server. I have
did you set up jvmRoute in server.xml ?
Filip
- Original Message -
From: Ho, Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 11:57 AM
Subject: Session Affinity
Hi,
I am trying to load balance between 2 Tomcat servers. But I cannot get
session
affinity
Filip Hanik said:
did you set up jvmRoute in server.xml ?
- Original Message -
From: Ho, Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 11:57 AM
Subject: Session Affinity
My configuration is Solaris 2.9, Apache 2.0.47, Tomcat 4.1.27 and JK2
2.0.2
Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 3:02 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Session Affinity
did you set up jvmRoute in server.xml ?
Filip
- Original Message -
From: Ho, Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 11:57
He said he did, see above.
-Dave
He said he did, but he didn't LOL :)
Filip
- Original Message -
From: David Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 12:44 PM
Subject: Re: Session Affinity
Filip Hanik said:
did you set up
Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Problem with Load Balancing using mod_jk and session
affinity.
It definitely works as I have it working too. What you have to do is also
make sure you encodeURL all links and form actions.
-Original Message-
From: Eddie Bush [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi,
I've successfully installed and configured apache and 2 tomcats using mod_jk.
Unfortunately the load balancing works without session affinity between my 2 tomcat
instances. I discovered the issue by calling the following link:
/examples/servlet/SessionExample. I keep getting switch
tomcats using mod_jk.
Unfortunately the load balancing works without session affinity between my 2 tomcat
instances. I discovered the issue by calling the following link:
/examples/servlet/SessionExample. I keep getting switch between my 2 tomcat
instances.
I know that my jvmRoute attribute
Balancing using mod_jk and session
affinity.
I believe (and I could be wrong) that you need to specify the _worker
name_ for jvmRoute. ubeans.com/tomcat - they do it. He tested it and
claims he has it working fine. Check it out.
Regards,
Eddie
Robert Chartier wrote:
Hi,
I've
]
_
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Brown Bay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Freitag, 25. Januar 2002 00:09
An: Tomcat Users List
Betreff: Re: Load balancer - no session affinity
Can you please send this information to me or post it on the web
It's already there and has been posted hours ago.
http://www.ubeans.com/tomcat
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jean-Luc BEAUDET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Freitag, 25. Januar 2002 15:17
An: Tomcat Users List
Betreff: Re: AW: Load balancer - no session affinity
Could yu
Hi,
I have an apache 1.3.22 server with two tomcat 4.0.2-B2
servers to serve JSP pages. I use the load balancer.
The problem is that when I reload the /index.jsp page,
I randomly get the first or the second tomcat server.
So the problem seems to be that sticky sessions (aka
session affinity
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Pascal Forget wrote:
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 16:48:16 -0500
From: Pascal Forget [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Load balancer - no session affinity
Hi,
I have an apache 1.3.22 server with two tomcat
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Pascal Forget wrote:
You might start with the Release Notes :-). They will tell you that this
feature is not implemented yet.
The jvmRoute was added to the Catalina core.
You use it through a 'jvmRoute' attribute on the engine (give it a unique
name). After that, I
Hi Craig,
Thanks for the info. I had read the release notes,
but, and I don't mean to offend anyone, I was not
sure the doc was up-to-date.
A problem that I have is that mod_jk and modwebapp do
not seem to be listed anywhere in the apache modules
section, and I don't see on the Jakarta website
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Pascal Forget wrote:
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 17:05:26 -0500
From: Pascal Forget [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Load balancer - no session affinity
Hi Craig,
Thanks for the info. I
Hi Craig,
Thanks for the info. I had read the release notes,
but, and I don't mean to offend anyone, I was not
sure the doc was up-to-date.
A problem that I have is that mod_jk and modwebapp do
not seem to be listed anywhere in the apache modules
section, and I don't see on the Jakarta
.
It works! I now have a working apache 1.3.22 handling
static content and dispatching *.jsp and servlet requests
to two tomcat 4.0.2 Beta2 servers using the load
balancing worker. Session affinity works, and if one
tomcat server dies, the other one ends up processing
all requests.
If someone's
: Thursday, January 24, 2002 5:35 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Load balancer - no session affinity
Remy Maucherat wrote:
The jvmRoute was added to the Catalina core.
You use it through a 'jvmRoute' attribute on the engine
(give it a unique name). After that, I think it should
be ok
I will write down my notes and then I will post
the URL on this list in a few hours.
Pascal
Charles N. Harvey III wrote:
Pascal,
umm... just about everybody wants to know!!
That's really great that you got it working. If you
have a place to post such configurations or want to post
]
_
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Brown Bay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Freitag, 25. Januar 2002 00:09
An: Tomcat Users List
Betreff: Re: Load balancer - no session affinity
Can you please send this information to me or post it on the web as per
your convinience.
Thanks.
Brown
43 matches
Mail list logo
