> -Original Message-
> From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 2:01 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List; Jason Bainbridge
> Subject: Re: Tomcat vs Apache
>
>
> I think there is not much question that the Apache server is
> far more efficient serving static ht
I like marc.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-user&r=1&w=2
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Kirk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 8:14 AM
> To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: What happened to the searchable list archive?
>
>
>
> It's been a f
Hi everyone,
The number of sites we support has recently expanded, and we're starting to
run into db connection errors : we are running out.
Mysql currently has its default max (somewhere around 100?), and I'll be
scheduling a restart to increase this count (as an aside: anyone know how
to up
Javaranch.
http://saloon.javaranch.com/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi
> -Original Message-
> From: David Wall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 3:07 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: JSP-specific newsgroups/mailing list
>
>
> Can anybody recommend a good JSP/serv
You might consider the following:
1) if you wrote log4j.properties on one platform and uploaded it to another,
perhaps the format got mangled. Check to be sure that log4j.properties is
actually "log4j.properties", without some special, non-printable and hidden
character on the end of the filename.
how about instead of using a declared variable, use an appropriately scoped
attribute? You won't get a compile-time error retrieving a named attribute.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
>(i suspect it's the way
> Tomcat is telling the browser what type of file it's sending
> back... some kind of header info.. but i'm not sure how to go
> about debugging this)
>
> thx in advance,
> woodchuck
I like using FireFox for debugging this type of thing, and the livehe
Indeed, thanks Jon.
> -Original Message-
> From: Woodchuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 10:15 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: obscure tomcat 5.5 text file display bug?
> [Bugzilla candidate?]
>
>
> awesome! thanks, Jon!
>
> woodchuck
>
> ---
Why does 4.x have:
HTTP/1.1 200
Server: Microsoft-IIS/5.0
and 5.x have:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Server: Apache-Coyote/1.1
Are you fronting 4.x with IIS, and not 5.x? That is one config difference
that you'll need to dispense with, in order to be fairly comparing the two.
Mike Curwen
>
> header chu
The recognition (and so far, little acceptance) that form fields will not be
sent in a guaranteed order by a browser, and never mind that, because even
if your browser does, the container doesn't guarantee an order either... is
from "Beginner's Servlets". But maybe I only think that because the
another option is to use this:
http://www.talika.org/tms/
I'm using it on three tomcat 5.0.29 servers, each with a dozen or so vhosts,
and it works great.
> -Original Message-
> From: David Delbecq [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 7:02 AM
> To: Tomcat Users
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.5-doc/logging.html
> -Original Message-
> From: Trond Hersløv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 2:06 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Tomcat5.5 and Logging
>
>
> Hi,
> what happend with the Logging component form
coming late to the party with:
http://blogs.opensymphony.com/plightbo/archives/000175.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and minus the trailing ;
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Crowther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 11:01 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: an advice neede for use of encodeURL method...
>
>
> > From: jonas skrebys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
It's not so much a tomcat setting (it's not something you configure), as it
is writing the correct type of servlet.
I googled for [servlet "binary content"] and the first two links looked
decent.
> -Original Message-
> From: Shawn Maceno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, S
The reference in your stacktrace might be an indicator that you are not
running tomcat in 'headless' mode.
And now I understand from where the "by so-and-so on such-and-such" came
from in your original email. Check out http://alov.org/topic.do?t_id=369
by artem on 20
> -Original Message-
> From: David Short [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Arup needs to work on his social skills. We're all here
> trying to help each other, not to attack each other.
but... at least he likes donuts. So he can't be all that bad. ;)
> On 10/7/05, Arup Vidyerthy <[EMAI
regardless how the commiters feel about it, are you willing to release your
patched source files? (So for example, I can compile and deploy them
myself?) ;) If so, I'd say a page on your wiki might be alright for
distro, with a link to the page sent to tomcat-user ?
I'd be giving it a try abo
http://archive.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-3/archive/v3.2.4/
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Souza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 3:18 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: tomcat 3.2.4
>
>
> Hi folks,
>
> The question is simple - we'd like to get th
19 matches
Mail list logo
