Re: [Toolserver-l] Toolserver limitation to come?

2013-05-02 Thread Marlen Caemmerer
Hey, On Wed, 1 May 2013, Ryan Lane wrote: On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Tim Landscheidt t...@tim-landscheidt.dewrote: | [...] There were never answers to this, so I bring it up here again: 1. How were almost /all/ of the problems the TS have had with replication caused by that

Re: [Toolserver-l] Toolserver -- Labs

2013-05-02 Thread Tim Landscheidt
(anonymous) wrote: [...] Database replication came up yet again in the office hours. Many developers (myself included) seem to be holding off on Labs until database replication is up and running. The sooner this can happen, the better. But the remaining sticking point seems to be

Re: [Toolserver-l] Toolserver limitation to come?

2013-05-02 Thread Platonides
On 02/05/13 10:03, Marlen Caemmerer wrote: Hey, On Wed, 1 May 2013, Ryan Lane wrote: On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Tim Landscheidt t...@tim-landscheidt.dewrote: There were never answers to this, so I bring it up here again: 1. How were almost /all/ of the problems the TS have had

Re: [Toolserver-l] Survey: Moving to Labs

2013-05-02 Thread DaB.
Hello, At Thursday 02 May 2013 15:29:07 DaB. wrote: I'm confused. I thought we were all here to support the readers, editors, researchers and developers of the Wikimedia projects? If the toolserver is empty because Labs is accomplishing the goal, isn't that a good thing? I've asked this

[Toolserver-l] Cronie error

2013-05-02 Thread Lars Aronsson
I have a cronietab job that now gives this error message: error: commlib error: can't connect to service (Connection refused) Unable to run job: unable to send message to qmaster using port 444 on host damiana: got send error. Exiting. What does that mean, and how can I fix it? I have no idea

Re: [Toolserver-l] Survey: Moving to Labs

2013-05-02 Thread Aaron Halfaker
Hey folks, I usually steer clear of these sort of battles, but it looks like it's time to state the obvious: *we need to work together better*. We're wiki people, damn it. We're the people[1] who figured out how to build an encyclopedia through (effectively) an anonymous system when those with

[Toolserver-l] OFFLIST Re: Survey: Moving to Labs

2013-05-02 Thread Sumana Harihareswara
Thank you, more than I can say. -Sumana On 05/02/2013 11:20 AM, Aaron Halfaker wrote: Hey folks, I usually steer clear of these sort of battles, but it looks like it's time to state the obvious: *we need to work together better*. We're wiki people, damn it. We're the people[1] who

Re: [Toolserver-l] Survey: Moving to Labs

2013-05-02 Thread Sumana Harihareswara
Since I evidently fail at trying to keep my thank-yous offlist: Aaron, thanks for the note. I regret that DaB. and other members of the Toolserver community have gotten changed timelines and confused and changing messages around tools support. It sounds like DaB. and other Toolserver community

Re: [Toolserver-l] Toolserver limitation to come?

2013-05-02 Thread Patricia Pintilie
On May 2, 2013 3:08 AM, Marlen Caemmerer marlen.caemme...@wikimedia.de wrote: Hey, On Wed, 1 May 2013, Ryan Lane wrote: On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Tim Landscheidt t...@tim-landscheidt.de wrote: | [...] There were never answers to this, so I bring it up here again: 1. How were

Re: [Toolserver-l] Survey: Moving to Labs

2013-05-02 Thread Ryan Lane
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Aaron Halfaker aaron.halfa...@gmail.comwrote: Hey folks, I usually steer clear of these sort of battles, but it looks like it's time to state the obvious: *we need to work together better*. We're wiki people, damn it. We're the people[1] who figured out how

[Toolserver-l] SGE job queue availability and execution

2013-05-02 Thread Morten Wang
I've noticed some irregularity in job execution through SGE over the past few days. Currently it seems several queues are either disabled or in an error state. Is this expected? Is there an easy way to get an idea about how many jobs are queued and how quickly they're executed, in other words