Hey,
On Wed, 1 May 2013, Ryan Lane wrote:
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Tim Landscheidt t...@tim-landscheidt.dewrote:
| [...]
There were never answers to this, so I bring it up here
again:
1. How were almost /all/ of the problems the TS have had
with replication caused by that
(anonymous) wrote:
[...]
Database replication came up yet again in the office hours. Many
developers (myself included) seem to be holding off on Labs until database
replication is up and running. The sooner this can happen, the better. But
the remaining sticking point seems to be
On 02/05/13 10:03, Marlen Caemmerer wrote:
Hey,
On Wed, 1 May 2013, Ryan Lane wrote:
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Tim Landscheidt
t...@tim-landscheidt.dewrote:
There were never answers to this, so I bring it up here
again:
1. How were almost /all/ of the problems the TS have had
Hello,
At Thursday 02 May 2013 15:29:07 DaB. wrote:
I'm confused. I thought we were all here to support the readers, editors,
researchers and developers of the Wikimedia projects? If the toolserver is
empty because Labs is accomplishing the goal, isn't that a good thing?
I've asked this
I have a cronietab job that now gives this error message:
error: commlib error: can't connect to service (Connection refused)
Unable to run job: unable to send message to qmaster using port 444 on host
damiana: got send error.
Exiting.
What does that mean, and how can I fix it?
I have no idea
Hey folks,
I usually steer clear of these sort of battles, but it looks like it's time
to state the obvious: *we need to work together better*.
We're wiki people, damn it. We're the people[1] who figured out how to
build an encyclopedia through (effectively) an anonymous system when those
with
Thank you, more than I can say.
-Sumana
On 05/02/2013 11:20 AM, Aaron Halfaker wrote:
Hey folks,
I usually steer clear of these sort of battles, but it looks like it's time
to state the obvious: *we need to work together better*.
We're wiki people, damn it. We're the people[1] who
Since I evidently fail at trying to keep my thank-yous offlist: Aaron,
thanks for the note.
I regret that DaB. and other members of the Toolserver community have
gotten changed timelines and confused and changing messages around tools
support. It sounds like DaB. and other Toolserver community
On May 2, 2013 3:08 AM, Marlen Caemmerer marlen.caemme...@wikimedia.de
wrote:
Hey,
On Wed, 1 May 2013, Ryan Lane wrote:
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Tim Landscheidt t...@tim-landscheidt.de
wrote:
| [...]
There were never answers to this, so I bring it up here
again:
1. How were
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Aaron Halfaker aaron.halfa...@gmail.comwrote:
Hey folks,
I usually steer clear of these sort of battles, but it looks like it's
time to state the obvious: *we need to work together better*.
We're wiki people, damn it. We're the people[1] who figured out how
I've noticed some irregularity in job execution through SGE over the past
few days. Currently it seems several queues are either disabled or in an
error state.
Is this expected? Is there an easy way to get an idea about how many jobs
are queued and how quickly they're executed, in other words
11 matches
Mail list logo