Perhaps we may be able to make it a cross-tool, which can either be
embedded in MediaWiki or standalone (I'm not aware of any extension
doing that, but it's something I have considered several times myself).
CategoryTree was/is sort of that...
___
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Danny B. wikipedia.dann...@email.cz wrote:
Perhaps we may be able to make it a cross-tool, which can either be
embedded in MediaWiki or standalone (I'm not aware of any extension
doing that, but it's something I have considered several times myself).
Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22/05/12 19:16, DaB. wrote:
that's the reason why there is a toolserver: Because the WMF (and the
mediawiki-develeopers/techs) can not do everything themself and there are
several people with good ideas outside the WMF.
So the idea was we give them
On 25/05/12 23:12, Marcin Cieslak wrote:
If some of you needs help moving a php tool into a MediaWiki extension,
drop me a line. :)
. o O (only not to be allowed to run it on toolserver later?:)
Perhaps we may be able to make it a cross-tool, which can either be
embedded in MediaWiki or
On 21 May 2012 23:52, Lars Aronsson l...@aronsson.se wrote:
This madness has to stop. Wikisource depends on this service.
I understand the German toolserver is beyond repair, but
phe's statistics scripts should be moved to proper WMF servers.
This madness has to stop. Wikis should stop
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Merlijn van Deen valhall...@arctus.nl wrote:
On 21 May 2012 23:52, Lars Aronsson l...@aronsson.se wrote:
This madness has to stop. Wikisource depends on this service.
I understand the German toolserver is beyond repair, but
phe's statistics scripts should be
On 22/05/12 11:22, Merlijn van Deen wrote:
How do we make sure tools do not disappear? By making multi-maintainer
projects for them. However, we see that this doesn't happen enough -
see also the thread about the expiration of soxred93's account.
Options for improvement:
- better
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22/05/12 11:22, Merlijn van Deen wrote:
How do we make sure tools do not disappear? By making multi-maintainer
projects for them. However, we see that this doesn't happen enough -
see also the thread about the
On 2012-05-22 11:22, Merlijn van Deen wrote:
This madness has to stop. Wikis should stop depending on services that
are not hosted in multi-maintainer projects!
This would be an improvement over the current status, but it
is not sufficient. It's terrible that we depend on a single user,
but
Hello,
At Tuesday 22 May 2012 19:00:14 DaB. wrote:
We have got the WMF and its staff to keep things running, and
that's where this kind of statistics belongs. The WMF are
carefully considering whether new projects should be started,
they have agreed that Wikisource should be started (in 2003)
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 6:16 PM, DaB. w...@daniel.baur4.info wrote:
In my eyes the toolserver developed behind this original idea and is now a
good place to host stuff even when it is done
Just like Wikipedia was to Nupedia. Symmetry! :-)
___
On 22/05/12 19:16, DaB. wrote:
that's the reason why there is a toolserver: Because the WMF (and the
mediawiki-develeopers/techs) can not do everything themself and there are
several people with good ideas outside the WMF.
So the idea was we give them a (yes 1 ;-)) server and they can hosts
http://toolserver.org/~phe/statistics.php
now says
403: User account expired
This madness has to stop. Wikisource depends on this service.
I understand the German toolserver is beyond repair, but
phe's statistics scripts should be moved to proper WMF servers.
Back in April, I copied one set of
Toolserver users need to renew their accounts every so often[1] (Three
monthly is combing to mind, but someone else would need to confirm
(and they are given warnings I believe)), and if a user fails to do
that it is automatically locked, It's unfair to all TS users if user
accounts are allowed to
14 matches
Mail list logo
