Re: Topband: I need help proofing an Inverted L model I made please. 40’ x 143’, four 100’ radials, #14 wire.

2020-12-10 Thread Raymond Benny
Yes, Mark, N5OT go back a long way, 80's or so. At my QTH, Arizona high desert 4800ft, the soil is very non-conductive - typically dry shale and small rocks, it's called Caleche. We have very little rain, about 10" - 12" per year. Humidity very seldom goes above 30%, and temps in the summer are

Re: Topband: I need help proofing an Inverted L model I made please. 40’ x 143’, four 100’ radials, #14 wire.

2020-12-10 Thread Jeff Blaine
N6LF Rudy's web site and associated QEX series has empirical data to answer all of these questions regarding the number and length of on ground radials. 73/jeff/ac0c alpha-charlie-zero-charlie www.ac0c.com On 12/10/20 11:14 AM, Mark - N5OT wrote: Yeah.  I don't claim to be a radial expert

Re: Topband: I need help proofing an Inverted L model I made please. 40

2020-12-10 Thread Artek Manuals
Especially if you have elevated radials you will need a choke otherwise the coax and your shack will become part of the ground plane. . In my case I have a choke ( for common mode currents) and UNUN to match the 25 ohm impedance of the antenna to 50 ohms. In some installations the common

Re: Topband: I need help proofing an Inverted L model I made please. 40

2020-12-10 Thread Jim Brown
On 12/10/2020 4:33 AM, Rob Atkinson wrote: I've never understood what is gained by using a balun at the feedpoint in this application. The feedline is unbalanced as is the load. What's the point of a balun. That's the problem with the word "balun." A CHOKE is needed at the feedpoint so that

Re: Topband: I need help proofing an Inverted L model I made please. 40’ x 143’, four 100’ radials, #14 wire.

2020-12-10 Thread Mark - N5OT
Yeah.  I don't claim to be a radial expert but I do claim to have a lot of experience working other stations on 160 meters. My buddy W9RE told me on a DXpedition once that he built a dipole laying on the ground and it resonated on 160 when the wires were about 80 feet long. Ray, with

Re: Topband: Wednesday CW DX Activity Night

2020-12-10 Thread Wes
I heard you Roger but not strong enough to call. Wes  N7WS On 12/10/2020 4:08 AM, Roger Kennedy wrote: Great to hear lots of people on the band last night, and Conditions were pretty good ! The only strange thing was that Propagation seemed a bit one-way - I was getting some amazing Reports,

Re: Topband: I need help proofing an Inverted L model I made please. 40’ x 143’, four 100’ radials, #14 wire.

2020-12-10 Thread WI6X
> > To model radials, we must use Real High Accuracy Ground, with NO connection > to Ground. Read the EZNEC manual Yes! That is what I need to change. Thank you! Solution: I was connecting the radials to ground using EZNEC. I need to create the radials just above ground. Page 90 of the User

Re: Topband: I need help proofing an Inverted L model I made please. 40’ x 143’, four 100’ radials, #14 wire.

2020-12-10 Thread Wes
IMHO, for that number, on-the-ground radials do not need to be anywhere near that long.  Personally, I subscribe to the same-length-as-the-vertical guideline. My inverted-L is 55 feet of vertical tubing plus the horizontal wire.  My insulated, on the ground radials are 55.5 feet (9 radials out

Re: Topband: I need help proofing an Inverted L model I made please. 40

2020-12-10 Thread Rob Atkinson
I've never understood what is gained by using a balun at the feedpoint in this application. The feedline is unbalanced as is the load. What's the point of a balun. The wild variations in R and X over the range of the band will likely result in heat and loss at the balun. If the point is to

Topband: Wednesday CW DX Activity Night

2020-12-10 Thread Roger Kennedy
Great to hear lots of people on the band last night, and Conditions were pretty good ! The only strange thing was that Propagation seemed a bit one-way - I was getting some amazing Reports, whereas most signals with me were weaker. (and this wasn't just ME - I noticed the same with other EU