On Mon,10/12/2015 6:51 AM, Filipe Lopes wrote:
With these ferrites I ask the same question, should I put the choke close
to the 9:1 Balun or near the switching box and how many turns? some bevs
have the feed point at +- 60m away from the switching box.
Use the #31 material. Wind at least 20
On Mon,10/12/2015 5:45 AM, Filipe Lopes wrote:
I am about to add a common mode choke to isolate the antenna from its
feedline to each of my beverages and I only have FT240-61 ferrites.
#61 is a terrible material for use as a common mode choke below 500 MHz.
Try to find #31 or #43, and wind
"Where can I find a schematic for a good high pass filter that rolls off at
1700 kHz?"
Hopefully with permission of the moderator I suggest you might look at our
inexpensive filters. The specs are good even at 1.7 MHz
http://arraysolutions.com/Products/AS160HPF.htm
Jay Terleski
President
Array
Felipe,
I just now built & tested what you need.
I tried 7 & 8 turns, but it resolved too high in freq.
Use 9 TURNS on a core-stack of five (5) of P/N 2631803802 cores. That’s the
Mix #31 core.
For the choke windings, make the windings VERY tight to the core-stack.
To do that,
On Mon,10/12/2015 8:23 AM, Bill Hider wrote:
Use 9 TURNS on a core-stack of five (5) of P/N 2631803802 cores. That’s the
Mix #31 core.
Bill,
A 5-high stack of cores is only needed to handle high power. This is an
RX antenna, so suitable choking Z can be obtained with more turns on a
Hi guys,
I am about to add a common mode choke to isolate the antenna from its
feedline to each of my beverages and I only have FT240-61 ferrites. My
question is how many turns should I do on the ferrite using RG58 (all my
bevs are fed with RG58). Also should I put the choke near the 9:1 balun or
Hi Filipe
Zero , you should use material #31 or #77 , The core you have is not good
for low bands.
JC
N4IS
-Original Message-
From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Filipe
Lopes
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 8:46 AM
To: topBand
If you must use FT240-61, then in a single layer about 18 turns of RG58 would
fit,
which should give you ~600 Ohms on 1.8 MHz. That would be very good for a
dipole,
but for a Beverage a much higher impedance is needed. Try to fit as many turns
as possible, until there is no more room in the
Hello JC,
Thanks for your answer.
I just ordered a few 2631803802 and 5943003801 from mouser.
With these ferrites I ask the same question, should I put the choke close
to the 9:1 Balun or near the switching box and how many turns? some bevs
have the feed point at +- 60m away from the switching
With 5943003801 and RG58, closely fill-in a single layer,
leaving 10-15 mm on the outside perimeter unused.
That should be ~16 turns, giving you impedance near 4000 Ohm.
Such a choke should be placed close to all points where
the current on the outer surface of the coax shield
can pass to the
On 10/12/2015 9:03 AM, Jay Terleski wrote:
"Where can I find a schematic for a good high pass filter that rolls off at
1700 kHz?"
Hopefully with permission of the moderator I suggest you might look at our
inexpensive filters. The specs are good even at 1.7 MHz
>> With these ferrites I ask the same question, should I put the choke close
>> to the 9:1 Balun or near the switching box and how many turns? some bevs
>> have the feed point at +- 60m away from the switching box.
My two cents..It was interesting during the installation of the last
Thanks Jim and all for the help.
Mix #31 cores are already ordered in mouser.
73's cu on low bands
Filipe LOPES
CT1ILT CR6K
Sent from my SAMSUNG GALAXY S4
Em 12/10/2015 17:39, "Jim Brown" escreveu:
> On Mon,10/12/2015 6:51 AM, Filipe Lopes wrote:
>
>> With these
It is shown with RCA connectors. Is it available with
F?
BNC?
I have generally found RCA connectors to be unsatisfactory in the long term for a variety
of reasons generally revolving around the "Astro" plate hard nickel surfaces. A large
number of 160 receive antenna systems are built with
>"The favorable SDR averaging doesn't apply when the RF voltage at the receiver
>input is dominated by one huge signal, and if that signal exceeds the
>capability of the ADC in the radio, overload can definitely occur. So,
>although I believe that nearly all manufacturers will soon migrate to
Interesting comments, Steve, and to me quite on the mark. (In an ealier life, I
was a physics prof, though I've forgotten most of what I once knew).
Re the comment by another list member that "there are various distractions such
as the Central Limit Theorem...that don't add much to the
Hi Felipe
It works like a voltage divider where the impedance to ground should be lower
as possible to give you more attenuation like 1k/500ohms versus 1K/5 ohms
divider. You should use the choke near a good ground before entering the
station. If you switch box have a good ground it’s a
Then what if we *deliberately* inject hundreds, if not thousands of discrete RF
carriers into our SDR receivers from say...an internal RF carrier or noise
generator, mixed with the desired RF signal to mitigate OL caused by a few
strong carriers? It would be interesting to see the math and
Eduardo Araujo via Topband wrote:
> My two cents..It was interesting during the installation of
> the last beverage, we have only #31 core, so we placed it at the
> receiver side. Disconnecting the coax at the bev feed point and
> shorting the coax there, many AM
Hi Guys
It's well know the ability to copy weak signal near strong carriers. I run a
QS1R using HDSDR all the time shearing the same RX antenna with my IC7800.
In the last 10 years only once I worked a new country on 160 listening on
the SDR that I was not able to copy using the IC7800. David
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:28 PM, Mike Waters wrote:
> But as a recent thread here* established, there is *NO* SDR that can
> perform as
> well as a good ear-brain combo for copying the very weakest of signals
> buried in the noise. Maybe someday, but the future has not
Switchcraft and Neutrik both make excellent RCA male cable-mount
connectors. They are easy to terminate, and the shell will accept cable
with an o.d. of about 0.25-in. They can be used with RG58 and RG59
cables having a copper braid shield. I buy stuff like this from Full
Compass, near
Hi Barry,
Thanks for your input. Yes, I believe we included direct sampling digital
receivers (SDR) versus superhet receivers.
The post I made here today is not complete; rather that re-post everything,
I included a link to the early August discussion, which explained in detail
what I meant.
An SDR is better for several things, yes. One advantage is that
near-perfect extremely narrow filters can (and do) exist in software. But
as a recent thread here* established, there is *NO* SDR that can perform as
well as a good ear-brain combo for copying the very weakest of signals
buried in the
On Mon,10/12/2015 1:27 PM, JC wrote:
It works like a voltage divider where the impedance to ground should be lower
as possible to give you more attenuation like 1k/500ohms versus 1K/5 ohms
divider.
Yes.
But to expand on this -- often the interference is coupled into a gain
stage or RX by
I tried 7 & 8 turns, but it resolved too high in freq.
Use 9 TURNS on a core-stack of five (5) of P/N 2631803802 cores. That’s
the Mix #31 core.
The attenuation of any choke significantly depends on the common mode
impedance, and impedances from shield to ground. Many times just a few
Jim,
I sense a flaw in the CLT argument, which is likely a lack of understanding on
my part. What you are describing sounds more like AGC action. In-other-words,
moving the minimum detector level up the bell curve such that we have now lost
any capability of listening down into a hole
27 matches
Mail list logo