What do you give if you listen to the signal on a beverage? Does it
have a preamp and do you take that into account? A S9 on the transmit
antenna won't be S9 on a beverage. I think the idea of using a contest
to find out how you are getting out is fine but you don't, as others
have already pointed
On Fri,1/8/2016 9:32 AM, Barry N1EU wrote:
The only place anybody might use real signal reports in contests these days is
QRP contests.
When I'm running QRP, my "signal report" is that the other station hears
me and gives me TU after I send my exchange!
73, Jim K9YC
_
How?
I don´t remember any rig at that time showing signal strength correctly and
I started in the hobby in 1958.
Only a few modern SDR rigs do it nowadays.
And how to you report genuine signal strength reports with AGC turned off?
Or while receiving on special rx antennas?
Signal strength reports
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:20 PM, wrote:
> Hopefully we are using real signal reports during the Stew Perry contest.
> Stew would have wanted it that way.
It's interesting to see people complaining about general contest issues
when the thread is specifically about the
"When you say "NOT work", you probably need to specifically list the diminished
performance attribute due to more conductive media underneath."
The issue with horizontal wire and the ground is the fact that the reflected
signal from the ground is 180 degree out of phase, (-1 in the formula)
A contest program that interfaces with the rig could read AGC and be calibrated
to give adequate signal-strength readings, maybe not quite equal to a
laboratory field-strength meter but better than auto-5NN. Few things are more
ludicrous than being given 5NN & then asked for four or five
Hello to all.I am planning a 60 foot vertical.I am wanting to either
place a coil on the vertical for topband.The vertical is a hy-tower.I
have base loaded(not very effective) I have toploaded with a single
wire(not enough room).I now have plenty of room.So my question.
Base load with many
Hello John
I, too, have experimented with base and top loading with verticals on Topband.
No question about it, the toploading is much better. Just take a look at your
feedpoint impedance with the base coil vs any sort of top loading.
One point to note, a specific coil that will resonate
Rule of thumb...The higher you place the loading coil on the tower
before the horizontal top loading wire, the more efficient the antenna
will be. If the coil is at the top and then connects to a top loading
wire you solve several problems. If the wire end is brought temporarily
near the
_
A. E. BUZZ JEHLE
POB 2277
BANDERA TX 78003-2277 USA
1 830 796 4196
CELL 1 713 725 5914
On Jan 9, 2016, at 12:24 AM, Herbert Schoenbohm wrote:
Rule of thumb...The higher you place the loading coil on the tower before the
horizontal top loading wire, the
Rudy N6LF has covered the top loading issues pretty thoroughly, see
http://rudys.typepad.com/files/qex-short-verticals-for-160m.pdf
Bottom line IMO: install as many top loading wires as you can as
horizontal as possible and then consider a loading coil.
I had eight 6' spokes of 3/8 Al tubing
enough said, or needs to be said,,, lets close this thread now dx is
73 john w8wej
On 1/8/2016 6:18 PM, Tree wrote:
The Boring ARC does not pretend to know whether or not Stew would want the
TBDC named after him.
The Boring ARC did not create the Stew - it just saw a good idea that came
Hi Mort,
Well it could happen to us LIDs with poor fists on every QSO.
73,
Bill KU8H
On 01/08/2016 03:57 PM, Mort wrote:
A contest program that interfaces with the rig could read AGC and be calibrated to
give adequate signal-strength readings, maybe not quite equal to a laboratory
Not arguing at all with your "why" that goes with diminished performance.
Just pointing out that it's not an on-off switch but a diminishment to a
BOG that can still be useful with amplification and attention to issues
that hound all BOGs.
Regards,
Guy K2AV
On Friday, January 8, 2016, JC
I completely agree with Don on this. the incessant and utterly
meaningless "599" or "59" because it is programmed in and the operator
too lazy to think about a real signal report makes the minimal value
of contests sink to zero.
They have become nothing more than a vehicle to keep the ham radio
"Back when the signal report was a real part of the
exchange and contesters tended to exchange honest reports, a major contest
could be an opportunity to determine how well your station got out"
The days of "honest reports" in a contest? I am 63 years old, operated my first
contest when I
Sorry, I think this is nonsense, especially directed toward SPTBDC. If you
want to know "how well you got out" and better yet, how well you're
hearing, just look at your results listing in columns BestDxKM/MAXP/QRP/LOW
and compare with similar stations in your region. Also check whether you
Guy - I think we have beat this one into the ground. And it really isn't
consistent with the purpose of this reflector.
Thanks.
Tree N6TR
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
"...The days of "honest reports" in a contest? I am 63 years old, operated my
first contest when I was 18 and I don't remember those days. You found out how
well your station "got out" by how long you waited in the pileups and how much
of the time you could call CQ. ..."
Well, when I retired
I agree. This is my biggest gripe about contests, meaningless signal reports.
You hear SIG 599 PSE RPT. Any data sent which does not convey information is
noise.
This turns off hams, and more importantly, prospective hams.
Hopefully we are using real signal reports during the Stew Perry
You don't USE signal reports in Stew Perry, just grid squares.
The only place anybody might use real signal reports in contests these days
is QRP contests.
73, Barry N1EU
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:20 PM, wrote:
>
> I agree. This is my biggest gripe about contests,
One really needs to look at the contest rules before deciding to not send
RST. If it is the rules, please send it.
A few years ago, there was a bit of a blow up on the CQ Contest reflector
over this very issue. A high scoring station decided to not send RST. He
did this in order to shave a few
Does anyone recall the signal reports provided by Shortwave Listeners?
It was SINFO, later SINPO.
Signal, interference, noise, propagation, and overall. - If I recall
correctly.
It gave a better picture of signal quality, but took time. SWL's have time,
Contesters do not.
My $0.02
Art - NK8X
When you say "NOT work", you probably need to specifically list the
diminished performance attribute due to more conductive media underneath.
It is very easy to model a BOG over more conductive media. It should be
noted that the ability to form a *pattern* is retained, but the
*sensitivity* is
On Fri,1/8/2016 8:34 AM, Mort wrote:
Now, stuck with a DOS log, too old for exporting, I blench at the thought of
typing 62 years'-worth, especially as I've made more QSOs since retiring than
before.
Before giving up on exporting it, cast about for text-based methods of
exporting it to
It's been a long time since I entered a contest seriously so I can't get
DQd.
Doug
I wasn't born in Saskatchewan, but I got here as soon as I could.
_
One really needs to look at the contest rules before deciding to not send
RST. If it is the rules, please send it.
A few years
So for contesters the next logical step would be to eliminate the signal
report.
Doug
I wasn't born in Saskatchewan, but I got here as soon as I could.
-Original Message-
Does anyone recall the signal reports provided by Shortwave Listeners?
It was SINFO, later SINPO.
Signal,
"...some folks cried fowl"
So, did he chicken out ?
73 - Mort, G2JL
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
On Fri,1/8/2016 6:49 AM, kol...@rcn.com wrote:
In my experience, the average contester is more operationally and technically
savvy than the average ham, especially the average ham that complains about
them.
I agree. The contesters I know have better rigs, better antenna systems,
better
No he just ducked
"...some folks cried fowl"
So, did he chicken out ?
73 - Mort, G2JL
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
.
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Especially on 160 meters I don't think the S in RST has a lot of scientific
value since there is no real numerical standard as it relates to true
signal strength. In my own mind I have come up with a standard in which
the S is directly related to the S meter reading on my radio (so I don't
have
What I often do during a phone contest exchange is omit the signal report
and only give out the section, serial number, etc. Very few operators
request the signal report and when they do I reply 'my report to you is
already in your logging program, there is no use in repeating it.' I could
say a
Touché
> On Jan 8, 2016, at 8:49 AM, kol...@rcn.com wrote:
>
> In my experience, the average contester is more operationally and
> technically savvy than the average ham, especially the average ham that
> complains about them.
>
> 73, Kevin K3OX
>
>
>
> Topband Reflector
Eggsactly.
--
Michael Adams | N1EN | m...@n1en.org
-Original Message-
"...some folks cried fowl"
So, did he chicken out ?
73 - Mort, G2JL
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
34 matches
Mail list logo