Re: [topbraid-users] Re: Term and Label Re-use amongst Glossaries.. Taxonomies...assets and ontologies

Thanks Irene ! Simon On Wednesday, May 22, 2019 at 10:05:14 AM UTC+10, Irene Polikoff wrote: > > Business terms in a glossary are typically expected to be mapped to some > logical or physical data elements. The use case is to create some common > set of business definitions (e.g., customer ID)

Re: [topbraid-users] specialisation amoung inidviduals ...

> On 22 May 2019, at 16:39, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users > wrote: > > > Suppose I model some class stuff as instances of metaclasses > > (ex: > Class ProductType > Instances Door, WoodenDoor > > Could I use rdfs:subClassOf to relate WoodenDoor and Door OWL 2 punning

[topbraid-users] specialisation amoung inidviduals ...

Suppose I model some class stuff as instances of metaclasses (ex: Class ProductType Instances Door, WoodenDoor Could I use rdfs:subClassOf to relate WoodenDoor and Door Or do I have unwanted side effects then? (like introducing punning since domain/range are classes via: rdfs:subClassOf a rdf: