Thank you David for your valuable input as always.
The <> seem to have disappeared when copying, they are in the sourceā¦..
Thanks again and wishing you a happy and moreover semantic new year!
Michel
From: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com On
Behalf Of David Price
Sent: vrijdag 29 december 2023
I encounter an existing ontology that:
* Uses skos for terms
* Use shacl for shapes on instances that has a certain skos item as
dct:subject
* No use of rdfs/owl
Like:
otl-patroon:Aalgoot a sh:NodeShape ;
sh:closed true ;
sh:description "Basispatroon voor het