transmission of messages.
From: Irene Polikoff [mailto:ir...@topquadrant.com]
Sent: zondag 22 juni 2014 17:22
To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Cc: Bohms, H.M. (Michel)
Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] Re: domain ' inheritance'
Actually, it is the other way around. Restriction on a class
. (Michel)
Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] Re: domain ' inheritance'
Actually, it is the other way around. Restriction on a class applies to all of
its subclasses, domain or range declarations don't necessarily apply to all
subclasses.
This is according to the standard semantics. However, in practical
inherent to the electronic
transmission of messages.
From: Irene Polikoff [mailto:ir...@topquadrant.com]
Sent: zondag 22 juni 2014 17:22
To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Cc: Bohms, H.M. (Michel)
Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] Re: domain ' inheritance'
Actually, it is the other way around
All aspects of object orientation (encapsulation, inheritance, and
polymorphism) apply equally to class members and methods. In OWL/RDF we
have class inheritance but we don't have the structure of a class such as
we do in programming languages. The triple of S-P-O is a very simple
structure,
Actually, it is the other way around. Restriction on a class applies to all of
its subclasses, domain or range declarations don't necessarily apply to all
subclasses.
This is according to the standard semantics. However, in practical use, people
typically only say that a property is in a
