to the electronic
transmission of messages.
Van: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com Namens
Jan Voskuil
Verzonden: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 1:04 PM
Aan: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Onderwerp: RE: [topbraid-users] skos question
Maybe [1] misses the owl:Ontology declaration, did you
Suite Users
Sent: 28 April 2020 12:57
To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [topbraid-users] skos question
After changes still, world icon:
[cid:image001.jpg@01D61D5D.72533CB0]
Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms
Senior Data Scientist
T +31888663107
M +31630381220
E michel.bo...@tno.nl<m
ission of messages.
Van: 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users
Verzonden: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 12:57 PM
Aan: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Onderwerp: RE: [topbraid-users] skos question
After changes still, world icon:
[cid:image002.jpg@01D61D5C.E534D550]
Dr. ir. H.M. (Mi
Van: 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users
Verzonden: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 12:48 PM
Aan: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Onderwerp: RE: [topbraid-users] skos question
Hi David
I do not mean the skos ITSELF as ontology.
But an own skos:ConceptScheme.
PO is defined as:
s
20 12:36 PM
Aan: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Onderwerp: Re: [topbraid-users] skos question
On 28 Apr 2020, at 08:34, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users
mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote:
I have a skos ontology importing another skos ontology.
Do you really 1
> On 28 Apr 2020, at 08:34, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users
> wrote:
>
>
> I have a skos ontology importing another skos ontology.
>
Do you really 1) mean “ontology” (i.e. the ontology that defines SKOS or some
extensions to that) or 20 do you really mean SKOS taxonomy
I have a skos ontology importing another skos ontology.
Import seems ok.
Stil I get the web icon when a concept from the example reused one via broader:
[cid:image004.jpg@01D61D40.3370EF00]
Should I add owl:Ontology next to skos:ConceptScheme?
Thx Michel
Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms
