[topbraid-users] Constraining forms to use individuals of a particular class AND scheme.

2017-10-10 Thread Steven Michael Folsom
I’m building constraints for form building, and I'm wondering the best way to constrain a PropertyShape to say for a given property not only link to individuals of a particular class type, but also individuals from a particular scheme. For example, in the following we want to use the property

Re: [topbraid-users] Are There Best Practices for Nested Forms?

2017-11-30 Thread Steven Michael Folsom
<hol...@topquadrant.com<mailto:hol...@topquadrant.com>> wrote: Yes that should work in principle. If it doesn't then we may have a bug. Have you tried it? Holger On 1/12/2017 7:32, Steven Michael Folsom wrote: One last question (hopefully) about Nested Forms. Is nesting a form wit

Re: [topbraid-users] Are There Best Practices for Nested Forms?

2017-11-30 Thread Steven Michael Folsom
t user enter city and street, automatically creating (behind the scenes) a resource of the type :Address and building all the right connections. Regards, Irene On Nov 21, 2017, at 10:20 AM, Steven Michael Folsom <sf...@cornell.edu<http://cornell.edu/>> wrote: I’m wondering if anyone

[topbraid-users] Are There Best Practices for Nested Forms?

2017-11-21 Thread Steven Michael Folsom
I’m wondering if anyone on the list would have advice/examples for defining SHACL to follow best practices for embedded/nested forms. Some of the questions I’ve come up with so far are: * PropertyGroups and PropertyShapes can have order. Can embedded Forms take an order position among

Re: [topbraid-users] Compiling Validation and UI/Form semanatics

2018-05-11 Thread Steven Michael Folsom
I realize the examples are not normative, but could the example given at https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/#AndConstraintComponent be stated without the blank nodes? E.g. ex:SuperShape a sh:NodeShape ; sh:property ex:SuperShapePropertyShape .

[topbraid-users] SHACL as html documentation

2018-08-11 Thread Steven Michael Folsom
I’m sure this is been asked before on the list, perhaps by me, but does anybody know of a SHACL to HTML conversion tool? Similar to LODE, but optimized for SHACL axioms? Thanks, Steven Steven Folsom Metadata Librarian Cornell University @sf433 -- You received this message because you are

[topbraid-users] Compiling Validation and UI/Form semanatics

2018-04-12 Thread Steven Michael Folsom
I would be interested to be able to look at any implementations where Validation shapes are compiled with non-Validation shapes to build Forms, where that the validation axioms are maintained in separate shapes from non-validation (UI) shapes? Is anyone doing this? We’ve been considering it

Re: [topbraid-users] Companies using SHACL

2018-04-03 Thread Steven Michael Folsom
We aren’t (yet) using SHACL for validation, but we ARE using it for form building for data that we want to comply/validate with our data goals. So maybe the answer is, “kind of”. A next step will be to decouple our form semantics from data validation semantics. Shouldn’t be too hard. Thanks,