Polikoff
Verzonden: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 3:06 PM
Aan: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Onderwerp: Re: [topbraid-users] owl:oneOf to shacl ?
You asked “what is better”. To me, answering this question requires considering
the context of use from which come criteria for what it means to be better.
If y
You asked “what is better”. To me, answering this question requires considering
the context of use from which come criteria for what it means to be better.
If you are making some statements that will simply be read by other people,
then the most important criteria for ‘better’ is how easily
ission of messages.
Van: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com Namens
Irene Polikoff
Verzonden: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 1:11 PM
Aan: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Onderwerp: Re: [topbraid-users] owl:oneOf to shacl ?
I made a typo. It should be
ex:accuracyShape
a sh:NodeShape ;
sh:targetObj
e manner in which you use it
> and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the
> electronic transmission of messages.
>
>
>
>
> Van: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com Namens
> Irene Polikoff
> Verzonden: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 5:46 PM
> Aan: topbraid-users
s@googlegroups.com
Onderwerp: Re: [topbraid-users] owl:oneOf to shacl ?
On 22 Apr 2020, at 08:23, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users
mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote:
Thx Irene
- so red should be in, clear!
Only if not using sh:property .
- leaving out the pat
the risks inherent to the electronic
transmission of messages.
Van: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com Namens
Irene Polikoff
Verzonden: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 5:46 PM
Aan: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Onderwerp: Re: [topbraid-users] owl:oneOf to shacl ?
See below
On Apr 21, 2020, a
any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the
> electronic transmission of messages.
>
>
>
>
> Van: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>
> mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>>
> Namens dprice
> Verzonden: Tuesday,
ctronic
transmission of messages.
Van: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com<mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>
mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>>
Namens dprice
Verzonden: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 1:17 PM
Aan: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com<mailto:topbraid-users@google
sers@googlegroups.com>>
> Namens dprice
> Verzonden: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 1:17 PM
> Aan: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>
> Onderwerp: Re: [topbraid-users] owl:oneOf to shacl ?
>
> Technically, x:Vehicle-loadLevel is indepen
ing from the risks inherent to the electronic
transmission of messages.
Van: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com Namens
dprice
Verzonden: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 1:17 PM
Aan: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Onderwerp: Re: [topbraid-users] owl:oneOf to shacl ?
Technically, x:Vehicle-loadLe
s@googlegroups.com>>
> Namens Jan Voskuil
> Verzonden: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 12:58 PM
> Aan: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>
> Onderwerp: RE: [topbraid-users] owl:oneOf to shacl ?
>
> The shape is a property shape. Whereve
2020 12:58 PM
Aan: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Onderwerp: RE: [topbraid-users] owl:oneOf to shacl ?
The shape is a property shape. Wherever the property in the property path
occurs (i.e. ex:loadLevel), the constraint will be checked/validated. So, no
need to specify sh:targetSubjectsOf -
2020 12:49 PM
Aan: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Onderwerp: Re: [topbraid-users] owl:oneOf to shacl ?
Oops - also had this:
ex:Vehicle
a sh:NodeShape ;
sh:property ex:Vehicle-loadLevel ;
.
ex:LoadLevelType
a sh:NodeShape ;
.
Cheers,
David
On 21 Apr 2020, at 11:44, 'Bohms, H.M. (Mic
, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users
Sent: 21 April 2020 12:45
To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [topbraid-users] owl:oneOf to shacl ?
I’ll add the labels indeed!
Wrt shacl: what is the target of this shape?
No need to add sh:targetSubjectsOf ex:loadLevel ?
Dr. ir. H.M
> Verzonden: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 11:56 AM
> Aan: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>
> Onderwerp: Re: [topbraid-users] owl:oneOf to shacl ?
>
> Not sure about “best” but I did this and it works great and aligns with your
> model:
>
to the electronic
transmission of messages.
Van: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com Namens
dprice
Verzonden: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 11:56 AM
Aan: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Onderwerp: Re: [topbraid-users] owl:oneOf to shacl ?
Not sure about “best” but I did this and it work
Not sure about “best” but I did this and it works great and aligns with your
model:
1) Added to ensure drop-down lists show the right instances for selection in a
UI
ex:Heavy
a ex:LoadLevelType ;
rdfs:label "Heavy" ;
.
ex:Light
a ex:LoadLevelType ;
rdfs:label "Light" ;
.
ex:Normal
a
17 matches
Mail list logo
