Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 247 (Hidden Service Vanguards) Overhaul

Mike Perry writes: > Mike Perry: >> I spent some time trying to clean up proposal 247 based on everyone's >> comments, as well as based on my own thoughts. Please have a look if you >> commented on the original proposal, and complain if I've not taken your >> thoughts

[tor-dev] Proposal: End-to-end encrypted onion services for non-Tor clients

Hello all, I have been thinking about ideas to make Tor hidden services more available and secure for non-Tor users. Inline I've included a draft proposal which describes an end-to-end encrypted Tor2Web-like system. I'm really interested in hearing any suggestions, comments or criticism about

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 247 (Hidden Service Vanguards) Overhaul

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, I like this very much. See comments inline. On 9/14/2015 2:07 AM, Mike Perry wrote: > I spent some time trying to clean up proposal 247 based on > everyone's comments, as well as based on my own thoughts. Please > have a look if you commented

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 247 (Hidden Service Vanguards) Overhaul

Mike Perry writes: > Mike Perry: >> I spent some time trying to clean up proposal 247 based on everyone's >> comments, as well as based on my own thoughts. Please have a look if you >> commented on the original proposal, and complain if I've not taken your >> thoughts

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal: End-to-end encrypted onion services for non-Tor clients

On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 16:12:23 + Donncha O'Cearbhaill wrote: > I have been thinking about ideas to make Tor hidden services more > available and secure for non-Tor users. Inline I've included a draft > proposal which describes an end-to-end encrypted Tor2Web-like system. >

Re: [tor-dev] Towards a new version of the PT spec...

It is my understanding that a sponsored project is coming up to work a pluggable transport 2.0 specification and implementation. I've also heard that the first step for this is to have a meeting where we get together with people that either use pluggable transports or implement them, for the

Re: [tor-dev] . tor-roster's geo diversity badge and self-ref relays

On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 11:20:11PM +0200, Tom van der Woerdt wrote: > I agree, and this one in particular is important to some operators: by > allowing a relay to specify itself in the family, one can just have a single > configuration file for all relays in a family. Maybe somebody wants to

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 247 (Hidden Service Vanguards) Overhaul

George Kadianakis: > Mike Perry writes: > > > Mike Perry: > >> I spent some time trying to clean up proposal 247 based on everyone's > >> comments, as well as based on my own thoughts. Please have a look if you > >> commented on the original proposal, and complain if

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 247 (Hidden Service Vanguards) Overhaul

George Kadianakis: > Mike Perry writes: > > > Mike Perry: > >> I spent some time trying to clean up proposal 247 based on everyone's > >> comments, as well as based on my own thoughts. Please have a look if you > >> commented on the original proposal, and complain if

Re: [tor-dev] . tor-roster's geo diversity badge and self-ref relays

> On 15 Sep 2015, at 08:34, Roger Dingledine wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 11:20:11PM +0200, Tom van der Woerdt wrote: >> I agree, and this one in particular is important to some operators: by >> allowing a relay to specify itself in the family, one can just have a single

Re: [tor-dev] Towards a new version of the PT spec...

On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 16:14:41 -0400 Brandon Wiley wrote: > It is my understanding that a sponsored project is coming up to work a > pluggable transport 2.0 specification and implementation. I've also > heard that the first step for this is to have a meeting where we get >

[tor-dev] [Measurement Team] Next IRC meeting happens on THURSDAY, Sep 17, 14:00 UTC in #TOR-DEV

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello list, This is an announcement/reminder that there will be an IRC meeting of the Measurement Team on THURSDAY, September 17, 2015, 14:00 UTC in #TOR-DEV https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20150917T14 Note that the

Re: [tor-dev] tor-roster's geo diversity badge and self-ref relays

>> Can this be downgraded to an informational message? (or eliminated entirely?) >> >> Penalties can be quite discouraging, particularly for minor configuration >> variants. >> >> Tim > >I agree, and this one in particular is important to some operators: by >allowing a relay to specify itself

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 247 (Hidden Service Vanguards) Overhaul

Mike Perry: > I spent some time trying to clean up proposal 247 based on everyone's > comments, as well as based on my own thoughts. Please have a look if you > commented on the original proposal, and complain if I've not taken your > thoughts into account. I spent yet more time thinking about