> On 15 Sep 2015, at 08:34, Roger Dingledine <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 11:20:11PM +0200, Tom van der Woerdt wrote: >> I agree, and this one in particular is important to some operators: by >> allowing a relay to specify itself in the family, one can just have a single >> configuration file for all relays in a family. > > Maybe somebody wants to make a trac ticket pointing to this thread, > and suggesting that Tor should notice when it's about to list its > own fingerprint in its family line, and just quietly leave it out? > > I bet that would be an easy minor feature for somebody to add, and it > would avoid creating this confusion in the future. > > —Roger
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/17065 <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/17065> Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968F094B teor at blah dot im OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
