Dear merc1...@f-m.fm,
Is DNSSEC is not evil? To me it seems like the 1984 of domain name systems...
Please take a good look at the political implications of DNSSEC.
I personally do not understand why this Tor Project spec includes mention of
DNSSEC:
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 04:33:34PM +, David Stainton wrote:
Dear merc1...@f-m.fm,
Is DNSSEC is not evil? To me it seems like the 1984 of domain name systems...
Please take a good look at the political implications of DNSSEC.
I personally do not understand why this Tor Project spec
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014, at 10:19, Артур Истомин wrote:
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 04:33:34PM +, David Stainton wrote:
Dear merc1...@f-m.fm,
Is DNSSEC is not evil? To me it seems like the 1984 of domain name
systems...
Please take a good look at the political implications of DNSSEC.
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 9:34 AM, George Kadianakis desnac...@riseup.net wrote:
George Kadianakis desnac...@riseup.net writes:
I inline a patch that specifies how voting should happen in proposal 236.
The changes reflect a discussion I had yesterday with nickm during the
Tor IRC meeting.
merc1...@f-m.fm:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014, at 11:54, Mike Cardwell wrote:
The exit nodes do the DNS requests. The client doesn't see an IP address.
It connects to the Tor SOCKS interface and says, connect me to hostname
example.com on port N. It doesn't look up the IP address of
example.com
