Re: [tor-dev] Pluggable transports research

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 5:32 PM, David Fifield wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 04:42:52PM -0800, Jodi Spacek wrote: > > I'm a master's student at the University of British Columbia (Vancouver, > > Canada) where I'm primarily researching anonymous systems and > censorship.

Re: [tor-dev] Pluggable transports research

On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 16:42:52 -0800 Jodi Spacek wrote: > I'm a master's student at the University of British Columbia > (Vancouver, Canada) where I'm primarily researching anonymous systems > and censorship. I would be delighted to contribute to pluggable > transports. > >

Re: [tor-dev] Pluggable transports research

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 04:42:52PM -0800, Jodi Spacek wrote: > I'm a master's student at the University of British Columbia (Vancouver, > Canada) where I'm primarily researching anonymous systems and censorship. I > would be delighted to contribute to pluggable transports.  > > Of particular

Re: [tor-dev] Pluggable transports research

Hello Jodi. I would like to point out some additional resources for you if you are interested in Pluggable Transports. First of all check out https://www.pluggabletransports.info/. Also, some work has been done in the past on audio data as a transport. There is of course the venerable SkypeMorph

Re: [tor-dev] Pluggable transports research

Hi Jodi, There's some discussion of pluggable transport issues on https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/traffic-obf that may be of interest. In terms of stenography, you end up with a couple choices. If you try to mimic existing protocols, you'll want to have read up on "The Parrot is Dead"

[tor-dev] Pluggable transports research

I'm a master's student at the University of British Columbia (Vancouver, Canada) where I'm primarily researching anonymous systems and censorship. I would be delighted to contribute to pluggable transports. Of particular interest is image and audio data stenography - is anything is in the works

Re: [tor-dev] stem support for v3 ephemeral onion services

> On 25 Jan 2018, at 05:14, Micah Lee wrote: > > Now that Tor Browser 7.5 is released and includes the tor 0.3.2 series, > which supports next generation onion services, I would love to make > OnionShare use these by default. Here is the issue [1]. > > OnionShare is

Re: [tor-dev] [tor-relays] Marker branch for current tor release(s)

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 4:02 AM, teor wrote: > (I dropped tor-relays, we can tell them when we reach a conclusion.) > > Hi Nick, > > Can we maintain an "alpha" branch with the latest Tor alpha, > and a "stable" branch with the latest Tor stable? Hm. I'm not strictly opposed

Re: [tor-dev] onionoo.tpo stuck at 2018-01-21 22:00

Hi nusenu, On 2018-01-22 18:57, nusenu wrote: >> Looks like the primary CollecTor instance had a problem between 22:00 >> and 08:00 UTC. It works again now, as does Onionoo. > > Karsten, thanks for the fast reaction. > >> We didn't lose any data, because the primary CollecTor instance obtained

Re: [tor-dev] [tor-relays] Marker branch for current tor release(s)

>> Can we maintain an "alpha" branch with the latest Tor alpha, >> and a "stable" branch with the latest Tor stable? > I was just told about the previous thread and ticket for this feature: > https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2015-March/008582.html >

Re: [tor-dev] [tor-relays] Marker branch for current tor release(s)

> On 24 Jan 2018, at 20:02, teor wrote: > > (I dropped tor-relays, we can tell them when we reach a conclusion.) > > Hi Nick, > > Can we maintain an "alpha" branch with the latest Tor alpha, > and a "stable" branch with the latest Tor stable? I was just told about the

Re: [tor-dev] [tor-relays] Marker branch for current tor release(s)

(I dropped tor-relays, we can tell them when we reach a conclusion.) Hi Nick, Can we maintain an "alpha" branch with the latest Tor alpha, and a "stable" branch with the latest Tor stable? It would help some relay operators. And it would also help us get more alpha testing: