On 5/9/11 6:54 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
xxx-geoip-survey-plan.txt
Here's an old document I wrote a while ago about tracking usage by
country. Probably it should go into the metrics documentation
somewhere (if we do this), or get thrown into old (if we won't do
On 6/11/11 2:41 PM, and...@torproject.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 08:17:35AM +0200, karsten.loes...@gmx.net wrote 2.5K
bytes in 34 lines about:
: Do you plan to fix links in the mailing list archives as well? How
: about links in our e-mail inboxes?
:
: Nope. But we could add
Hi Damian,
On 7/13/11 7:01 PM, Damian Johnson wrote:
Hi all. Over the last few weeks I've been working on a relay setup
wizard for arm. Its purpose is to make volunteering to be a relay
easy, narrowing the options to those most commonly used and giving
nice descriptions/defaults to encourage
On 7/14/11 5:52 AM, Damian Johnson wrote:
In that case,
setting Internal Relay as the default could be problematic. If people
use arm on their clients, they shouldn't be tricked into becoming a
relay only because that's the default. They should know what they're
doing when setting up a
On 7/29/11 3:39 PM, Steven Murdoch wrote:
Hi Karsten, David,
On 29 Jul 2011, at 05:00, Karsten Loesing wrote:
Hmm, for some reason I don't get those errors (or warnings) about unused
variables. But I think you're right in that these variables can go away.
This is Steven's code, so I'd
Hi everyone!
At the last annual dev meeting in Waterloo we had a very productive
discussion about managing the various channels of Tor communication:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/org/meetings/2011TorAnnualDevMeeting/FirehoseOutput
Related to that discussion, we should talk
Hi everyone,
we have been discussing sanitizing and publishing our web server logs
for quite a while now. The idea is to remove all potentially sensitive
parts from the logs, publish them in monthly tarballs on the metrics
website, and analyze them for top visited pages, top downloaded
packages,
On 8/22/11 2:29 PM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
Hi everyone!
At the last annual dev meeting in Waterloo we had a very productive
discussion about managing the various channels of Tor communication:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/org/meetings/2011TorAnnualDevMeeting
Hi Andrew,
On 9/2/11 2:18 AM, Andrew Lewman wrote:
On Thursday, August 25, 2011 04:08:00 Karsten Loesing wrote:
we have been discussing sanitizing and publishing our web server logs
for quite a while now. The idea is to remove all potentially sensitive
parts from the logs, publish them
On 9/2/11 3:06 PM, Sebastian Hahn wrote:
On Sep 2, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On 9/2/11 2:18 AM, Andrew Lewman wrote:
On Thursday, August 25, 2011 04:08:00 Karsten Loesing wrote:
we have been discussing sanitizing and publishing our web server logs
for quite
On 8/29/11 10:48 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
The new deadline is
Sunday, September 4, 2011
Dear Tor developers and volunteers who haven't responded yet: If you
have an opinion on using Trac, please let us know!
First of all, thanks to the 13 people for taking part in the survey
On 9/6/11 12:06 PM, Christian Fromme wrote:
[Suggestion: Backup and delete all reports with a component name in
them. The current list of Available Reports list is mostly useless for
newcomers who don't care much about components, but who are interested
in finding something to work on.
On 9/6/11 2:19 PM, Robert Ransom wrote:
On 2011-09-06, Karsten Loesing karsten.loes...@gmx.net wrote:
1.1 Which of the reports (stored ticket queries) do you use most often?
From all the replies, there's 1 person using 5 reports, 2 persons using
3 reports, 1 person using 2 reports, 4
On 9/6/11 11:01 PM, katmagic wrote:
Sorry for the late reply — I haven't checked my email in a while — but
I'm replying anyway because I've some strong feelings on this issue. In
short, Trac sucks. My issues with it are as follows:
1. The design sucks.
You're right, it needs more green!
On 9/12/11 3:51 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 10:44:11AM +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
The Component field (10, 1, 1) is used to find/filter tickets and guess
who's paying attention to a ticket. 1 person said that the many Tor
components make it hard to refer
On 9/13/11 5:20 AM, katmagic wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 15:57 +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
On 9/6/11 11:01 PM, katmagic wrote:
Sorry for the late reply — I haven't checked my email in a while — but
I'm replying anyway because I've some strong feelings on this issue. In
short, Trac sucks
Hi Nick,
a few comments to proposal 186 below:
On 9/21/11 8:13 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
In consonance with our changes to the (Socks|Trans|NATD|DNS)Port
options made in 0.2.3.x for proposal 171, I make a corresponding
change to allow multiple SocksPort options and deprecate
Looks like we lost tor-dev somewhere. Quoting Nick's reply without
cutting out stuff I have no comments to.
On 9/22/11 10:16 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Karsten Loesing
karsten.loes...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi Nick,
and here are a few comments to your proposal 185
On 8/25/11 10:08 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
we have been discussing sanitizing and publishing our web server logs
for quite a while now. The idea is to remove all potentially sensitive
parts from the logs, publish them in monthly tarballs on the metrics
website, and analyze them for top
On 10/20/11 5:34 PM, Erinn Clark wrote:
* Karsten Loesing karsten.loes...@gmx.net [2011:10:19 16:12 +0200]:
2. Try harder to include diffs in tor-wiki-changes notifications. I
looked for an option that does this in Trac 0.12, but didn't find one.
Erinn, do you know how we could implement
On 1/16/12 8:46 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
On 1/11/12 10:34 AM, Linus Nordberg wrote:
Alex Le Heux ale...@funk.org wrote
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:57:00 +0100:
| RFC 3849 defines the prefix 2001:DB8::/32 as being reserved for
| documentation. That should be fine
Hi everyone,
we have an upcoming sponsor F milestone on July 1. Here's the list of
deliverables:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/org/sponsors/SponsorF/Year2#Phase2Nov152012
We need a ticket owner for all tickets in the July 1 milestone. We also
need a schedule for each of those
Hi everybody,
we're discussing in #5684 whether we can stop sanitizing nicknames in
the bridge descriptors that we publish here:
https://metrics.torproject.org/data.html#bridgedesc
The sanitizing process is described here:
https://metrics.torproject.org/formats.html#bridgedesc
When we started
On 5/3/12 7:22 PM, Sebastian G. bastik.tor wrote:
The safest way is to ensure that bridge and relay operators are aware of
the fact that their naming scheme should avoid correlations, wherever
both are actually located. The question here is on how to ensure it?!
This is a usability question.
On 5/3/12 8:06 PM, Robert Ransom wrote:
On 5/3/12, Karsten Loesing kars...@torproject.org wrote:
How do we define similar and located where the relay is? I can see
how a relay bastik1 and a bridge bastik2 have similar nicknames, but
would we also teach a program that bastikrelay
On 5/4/12 3:52 PM, Sebastian G. bastik.tor wrote:
Karsten Loesing, 04.05.2012 12:31:
Sounds like a fine approach. Want to do it (when the 2008 tarball is
available)? It would be interesting to see a) what fraction of bridges
you think you can derive IP addresses for and b) how accurate your
[Moving this thread to tor-dev as suggested by Damian in separate mail.]
Hi Damian, hi Beck,
On 5/4/12 6:59 PM, Damian Johnson wrote:
Hi Beck.
I noticed that stem has not been updated during the last ten days
Yup, I've been busy for a while with a new arm release [1] and a
variety of
On 5/6/12 3:36 AM, Damian Johnson wrote:
First I'd like to make sure that I'm clear on what we're trying to do.
The javadocs for VerifyDescriptors [1] says that it...
Verify server descriptors using the contained signing key. Verify that
1) a contained fingerprint is actually a hash of the
On 5/7/12 7:49 PM, Beck Chen wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Karsten Loesing kars...@torproject.orgwrote:
On 5/6/12 3:36 AM, Damian Johnson wrote:
First I'd like to make sure that I'm clear on what we're trying to do.
The javadocs for VerifyDescriptors [1] says that it...
Verify
On 5/8/12 4:47 AM, Robert Ransom wrote:
On 5/8/12, Beck Chen csyb...@gmail.com wrote:
According to the outline, the long-term identity key should be different
from the
signing key, which changes every 3-12 months. Then why should the signing
key
become the identity key in the descriptor
Hi Nick,
here is the proposal as discussed in #5807 to improve our bridge usage
statistics.
Thanks,
Karsten
Filename: xxx-bridge-v3-reqs-stats.txt
Title: Make bridges report statistics on daily v3 network status requests
Author: Karsten Loesing
Created: 10-May-2012
Status: Open
Target: 0.2.4.x
On 5/14/12 2:30 AM, Damian Johnson wrote:
Hi Karsten, hi Beck. Just pushed stem support for extrainfo
descriptors (ye gods they have a lot of attributes)...
* Implementation
https://gitweb.torproject.org/stem.git/blob/HEAD:/stem/descriptor/extrainfo_descriptor.py
* Unit Tests
On 5/10/12 5:46 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:31 AM, Karsten Loesing kars...@torproject.org
wrote:
here is the proposal as discussed in #5807 to improve our bridge usage
statistics.
This is now proposal 201. Thanks!
Thanks for adding the proposal!
However, I found
On 5/19/12 11:41 AM, Sebastian G. bastik.tor wrote:
Karsten Loesing, 16.05.2012 08:47:
On 5/2/12 2:30 PM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
If nobody objects within the next, say, two weeks, I'm going to make an
old tarball from 2008 available with original nicknames. And if nobody
screams, I'll
Hi Damian,
I plan to make a few changes to the bridge descriptor sanitizer to
implement changes discussed on this list and in various Trac tickets.
The result will be format version 1.0. Here's what will change compared
to the current (unversioned) format. Can you take a look whether stem
would
Hi Damian,
On 5/21/12 5:55 PM, Damian Johnson wrote:
Hi Karsten.
- Bridge network statuses contain a published line
Oh, I didn't realize that there was a consensus that included bridges.
Mind explaining where they come from and what they're for?
The bridge authority generates a bridge
On 5/21/12 7:19 PM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
On 5/21/12 5:55 PM, Damian Johnson wrote:
I didn't realize that bridge extrainfo descriptors _were_ sanitized.
What section of the format page details the scrubbing for those?
Aha, good catch, that's not mentioned on the format page. Right now
Hi Damian,
On 5/23/12 7:27 PM, Damian Johnson wrote:
The bridge descriptor tarballs contain bridge network statuses, server
descriptors, and extra-info descriptors. See:
https://metrics.torproject.org/data.html#bridgedesc
Oops, I read 'contain similar documents as the relay descriptor
On 5/26/12 9:30 AM, Sebastian G. bastik.tor wrote:
Karsten Loesing, 22.05.2012 09:24:
Unless one objects or you disagree I'm going to upload the files I
created and explain how and maybe I can say even why.
No objections at all. Open discussion is good.
I created a Blog, just because I
On 5/16/12 8:47 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
On 5/2/12 2:30 PM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
If nobody objects within the next, say, two weeks, I'm going to make an
old tarball from 2008 available with original nicknames. And if nobody
screams, I'll provide the remaining tarballs containing original
Hi Felix,
On 6/4/12 6:51 AM, Felix Ker wrote:
I'm trying to use TorStatus and it took me almost 2 hours to set everything
up and able to run tns_update.pl smoothly with no error. However, I am
facing a problem that Google cannot help me.
[0] starting...
[0] mirror?
[0] connecting to Tor
On 6/4/12 8:40 AM, Felix Ker wrote:
Thank you for sharing! Looks like there's too little information about how
Atlas can be used to list the servers. Would you be able to share any
documentation?
Do you mean how Atlas can be used to display a list of the current
relays and/or bridges rather
On 6/6/12 5:49 PM, SiNA Rabbani wrote:
I need to get a count of all the Amazon Tor images running bridges. The
reason I need this data is so I can follow-up with acessnow.org about
the campaign they are running at: https://www.globalproxycloud.net/
How should I go about that data?
See the
On 6/25/12 3:45 AM, Damian Johnson wrote:
Karsten, should the 'dirreq-v3-share' percentage values be able to go
above 100%? The extra-info descriptors that I just fetched has one
such entry, which makes stem's descriptor parser complain...
extra-info siltornado
On 6/28/12 11:37 PM, Damian Johnson wrote:
- integ tests are pretty short, and just run the parser against some
test data from the metrics archive and the cached consensus
Keep in mind that metrics tarballs can be huge. stem's tests probably
shouldn't download one or more of these tarballs
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:25 AM, Norman Danner ndan...@wesleyan.edu wrote:
Do I understand Onionoo correctly to be basically a small webservice that
returns a JSON formatted description of data read from a file based on the
HTTP request parameters, along with a program that presumably runs with
On 7/7/12 7:06 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
The only part I'm worried about here is that we had once considered
doing authenticated hidden services or some other kind of wacky hidden
service with a design like b.aaa.onion, where
b is some additional data to use in the
Hi Walter,
On 7/5/12 6:21 PM, Walter Kim wrote:
Oops, your mail got lost somewhere between the Florence trip and
recovering from it. Sorry for the late reply.
I'm a mathematician/coder/visualization person living in San Francisco.
I've been in contact with Karsten Loesing about making more
On 7/18/12 5:12 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:12 AM, Karsten Loesing kars...@torproject.org
wrote:
here are the first five metrics tech reports that I'd like to turn into
Tor tech reports (see #5405 for the idea behind this).
I'd like to offer some typographical
On 7/28/12 11:44 AM, Sathyanarayanan Gunasekaran wrote:
If you want some sample summary, bandwidth, or details documents to
see see how they look like, I can send you the ones I got from Karsten
during the Tor dev meeting.
Oh, I wasn't aware that Sathya is working on the backend and Megan and
Hi Walter, hi Arturo,
On 7/31/12 4:35 AM, Walter Kim wrote:
Hi Karsten, Arturo, and others,
Sorry for being out of touch for a couple weeks; I had some day job deadlines.
I've added more data (bandwidth, users) to site I'm working on:
http://tigerpa.ws/tor_metrics/
And set the default
Hi all,
here's what I did in July. The numbers in [] are the ticket number and
percentage of my total developer time in July.
Best,
Karsten
Briefly looked into Maxmind's GeoIP database that started labeling
relays as coming from the A1 -- Anonymous Proxy country. We'll need
to fix that, or
Hi Norman,
On 8/3/12 8:22 PM, Norman Danner wrote:
A few questions on the Onionoo protocol specification:
If multiple parameters are specified in the GET request, does that imply
a logical and or a logical or (or something else)? E.g., suppose the
GET request has type=relay and
Hi Norman,
On 8/3/12 9:42 PM, Norman Danner wrote:
If I understand the weights documents correctly, there is no one
consensus weight for a given router. What exactly is the ordering we
should use when the request asks to order by consensus weight?
It seems like determining the consensus
On 7/12/12 3:12 PM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
here are the first five metrics tech reports that I'd like to turn into
Tor tech reports (see #5405 for the idea behind this).
The next batch of ten Tor Tech Reports is now available (all in the list
except for the five from 2011 which I posted here
On 8/8/12 8:38 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Roger Dingledine a...@mit.edu wrote:
1) Do we have any requirements to release an 0.2.4.1-alpha at any
particular date? I haven't been following e.g. the latest SponsorG
timelines.
Yes, we should have tested packages by
Hi Philipp,
On 8/8/12 7:03 PM, Philipp Winter wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 12:22:16PM +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
Feedback much appreciated!
The pdf documents look really good now. I don't know if the tech reports get
cited a lot but it might be worth adding BibTeX entries next
Hi Paul,
On 8/9/12 3:03 PM, Paul Syverson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 08:29:25AM +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
On 8/8/12 8:13 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
Since HotPETS doesn't count as publishing perhaps this should be
listed as a tech report:
http://fscked.org/talks/TorFlow-HotPETS-final.pdf
Hi Norman,
On 8/10/12 3:15 AM, Norman Danner wrote:
On 8/9/12 5:28 PM, Norman Danner wrote:
Hi Karsten,
We have a preliminary version of the Pyonionoo front-end at
git://github.com/meganchang/pyonionoo.git
Make sure to look at the database branch. We'd be happy to hear
feedback.
Hi Norman,
On 8/10/12 4:10 PM, Norman Danner wrote:
Oh dear; hadn't realized this was an issue. We installed Twisted and
Cyclone from source.
There is a debian package for twisted (python-twisted), but not for
Cyclone.
I managed to install Cyclone with Sathya's apt-get/pip instructions.
On 8/14/12 9:31 PM, Andrew Lewman wrote:
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:09:39 +0200
Karsten Loesing kars...@torproject.org wrote:
Mike, Andrew, Roger, Runa: please update the wiki page with your
feedback in this thread. Please keep the developer feedback per
deliverable as short as possible, ideally
On 8/9/12 8:29 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
On 8/8/12 8:13 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
Since HotPETS doesn't count as publishing perhaps this should be
listed as a tech report:
http://fscked.org/talks/TorFlow-HotPETS-final.pdf
[...]
How about we put the LaTeX sources in tech-reports.git, change
On 8/23/12 10:12 PM, tagnaq wrote:
True, but: If one relay disappears for a while then the family may
break into two if it was the only joint.
For the family (see #6662):
3cce3a91f6a625~8DE5 bc1245cbe16d5ee9b2~2D25
the connecting relay was down since 2012-04-04 and still karsten
created
On 8/20/12 11:06 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
On 8/9/12 8:29 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
On 8/8/12 8:13 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
Since HotPETS doesn't count as publishing perhaps this should be
listed as a tech report:
http://fscked.org/talks/TorFlow-HotPETS-final.pdf
[...]
How about we put
Hi everyone,
August was a long month for me, and I feel like I spent more time
reviewing other people's code than writing my own. That's really cool!
We have a bunch of new metrics-related code now, and I hope there will
be even more code contributions for me to review next month!
So, below is
On 10/13/12 4:30 PM, Damian Johnson wrote:
Hi Karsten. This is actually really good timing. As you probably
noticed from tor-commits@ I just pushed support for network status
documents (v2 and v3 votes, consensus, and microdescriptor
consensuses). It's the combination of a month of work from
Hi Isis!
On 10/12/12 6:48 PM, Isis wrote:
So, I am rushing to meet the final deadline, but I still think it is doable. I
have mostly finished up my OONI work for the month, and I planned to spend the
remainder of this month working on the bridge test.
Sounds good. Does working include
On 11/10/12 11:50 AM, Tim Wilde wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Nick Mathewson ni...@freehaven.net wrote:
2.1. Better allocation of circuitID space
In the current Tor design, circuit ID allocation is determined by
whose RSA public key has the lower modulus. How ridiculous!
Hi Abel,
On 1/17/13 9:00 PM, Abel Luck wrote:
Question: How does proposal 207 (relay fetching through entry guards)
affect the user metric data?
Good thinking. AFAICS, accuracy of user estimates shouldn't be affected
by the introduction of directory guards. It may be that some relays
will
Hi everyone,
you probably heard of Torperf [0], the tool that produces our Tor client
performance graphs [1]. Torperf is mostly a bunch of scripts and
lengthy HOWTOs, so setting it up and keeping it happy is not exactly
trivial. The same applies to extending it, e.g., to make downloads
using
On 1/21/13 10:28 PM, Rob van der Hoeven wrote:
Hi Karsten,
Over a year ago I wrote a small measuring proxy called Monitor In The
Middle. This proxy sits between the browser and Tor and examines all
HTTP traffic. Results of the measurements like response times, timeouts
etc can be viewed
On 1/22/13 9:32 AM, Linus Nordberg wrote:
meejah mee...@meejah.ca wrote
Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:32:39 +0400:
| You'd need https://github.com/ln5/twisted-socks for a SOCKS client for
| this (looks like V4 only?). There are some other ones floating around
| out there, too, but nothing in core
On 1/22/13 9:35 AM, Linus Nordberg wrote:
Karsten Loesing kars...@torproject.org wrote
Mon, 21 Jan 2013 21:06:38 +0100:
| That's a lot, and to make things even more fun, there's a sponsor
| deadline to have more realistic Torperf measurements by February 28.
This is what stops me from
On 1/22/13 10:35 PM, Linus Nordberg wrote:
Karsten Loesing kars...@torproject.org wrote
Tue, 22 Jan 2013 21:56:47 +0100:
| | You'd need https://github.com/ln5/twisted-socks for a SOCKS client for
| | this (looks like V4 only?). There are some other ones floating around
| | out there, too
/karsten/tor.git/shortlog/refs/heads/morestats2
Feedback, to both proposal and code, much appreciated!
Thanks,
Karsten
Filename: xxx-usage-controller-events.txt
Title: Controller events to better understand connection/circuit usage
Author: Rob Jansen, Karsten Loesing
Created: 2013-02-06
Status
Hi Damian!
Thanks a lot for your feedback! The proposed event formats are not at
all set in stone. If we can change formats to make events easier to
parse, by all means let's do that. You probably have more experience
with the control port than anyone at Tor, so I say let's listen to you.
On
On 2/7/13 5:45 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Karsten Loesing kars...@torproject.org
wrote:
Hi everyone,
here's a proposal that defines three new controller events for the
TestingTorNetwork mode that shall help us better understand connection
and circuit usage
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Damian Johnson ata...@torproject.org wrote:
I wonder if we should avoid restricting connection types in the spec by
defining this argument as connection type _string_ as opposed to an
enumeration.
That depends on how volatile you think it'll be. If it's
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Andreas Krey a.k...@gmx.de wrote:
On Sat, 09 Feb 2013 14:27:33 +, Damian Johnson wrote:
...
I cringe a bit to suggest it, but maybe a mapping in a mapping?
CELL_STATS PCircID=8 PConnID=47110 PAdded=created:1,relay:1
PRemoved=created:1,relay:1
You can as
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:35 PM, meejah mee...@meejah.ca wrote:
I haven't looked at everything in proposal 218, but I would suggest
maybe splitting the CELL_STATS into CELL_STATS_LOCAL and
CELL_STATS_NETWORK:
650 SP CELL_STATS_NETWORK SP
CircID SP ConnID SP Added SP
On 2/11/13 5:37 PM, Damian Johnson wrote:
Sure. Please find the revised proposal in branch proposal218 of my
public torspec repository:
https://gitweb.torproject.org/user/karsten/torspec.git/shortlog/refs/heads/proposal218
Hi Karsten. Looks good! Pushed some revisions to my proposal218
On 2/12/13 4:54 PM, Damian Johnson wrote:
AppWard and ExitWard indicate the direction of cell flow through the
circuit. Previous cell events aggregated statistics for both directions and
therefore did not capture information which I believe may be important.
These are much more informative
On 2/19/13 5:45 PM, Damian Johnson wrote:
I think we should add two more fields
InboundName and OutboundName to CELL_STATS events. These fields would
contain LongName ($CC88FB3B78599580F1EE4F6F73E26A7EC3DF2CA1~tokenconn)
or Target (like 60.1.0.0:10002) of the previous or next node in a
On 2/20/13 5:13 PM, Damian Johnson wrote:
In general, I agree. Here, I re-used the code that adds a LongName or
Target to CIRC events. It's a single function call that returns the
best information tor has about the remote end of a connection.
I'm not sure that I follow. Do you mean the
On 2/22/13 5:36 PM, Rob Jansen wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Karsten Loesing
kars...@torproject.orgwrote:
On 2/12/13 4:54 PM, Damian Johnson wrote:
AppWard and ExitWard indicate the direction of cell flow through the
circuit. Previous cell events aggregated statistics for both
On 2/23/13 11:20 PM, Rob Jansen wrote:
On Feb 23, 2013 4:22 PM, Karsten Loesing kars...@torproject.org wrote:
Your understanding of n_circ_id and p_circ_id matches mine, but are you
sure there's a UID for circuits other than origin circuits? I think you
mean origin_circuit_t-global_identifier
[Nick, can you merge my torspec proposal218 branch, please? Thanks!]
On 2/28/13 2:08 AM, Rob Jansen wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Karsten Loesing kars...@torproject.org
wrote:
On 2/23/13 11:20 PM, Rob Jansen wrote:
On Feb 23, 2013 4:22 PM, Karsten Loesing kars
On 4/10/13 11:44 PM, Praveen Kumar wrote:
I am Praveen Kumar from India. I want to work on the project Searchable
Tor descriptor and Metrics data archive. I have participated in the past
instances of GSoC with Melange and e-cidadania, and have an extensive
experience in development with
On 4/15/13 10:20 PM, Miłosz Gaczkowski wrote:
Hi,
Hi Miłosz,
I'd like to get involved in the development of pyDoctor
(https://www.torproject.org/getinvolved/volunteer.html.en#metrics-pyDoctor).
I'm not too bothered about whether it'd be through GSoC or not (i.e. I
obviously wouldn't mind
(Adding tor-dev back to the cc.)
On 4/16/13 9:31 PM, Miłosz Gaczkowski wrote:
On 16/04/2013 07:28, Karsten Loesing wrote:
Sounds great! Welcome to Tor!
Thanks for the warm welcome :)
In theory, you can start working on this project right now. The first
step is probably to understand what
On 5/7/13 12:44 AM, Sam Burnett wrote:
Hi,
Hi Sam,
I'd like to help improve the Tor Censorship Detector. I've read some
background material and think I understand the basics of George Danezis'
detection algorithm [1, 2].
Great! Trivial nitpick: here's a better URL for George's tech report:
On 5/12/13 12:38 PM, David Fifield wrote:
Karsten, could I ask you to take a quick look at this code?
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/7549#comment:14
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/attachment/ticket/7549/onionoo-querying-ver2.zip
It's a daemon that keeps a local
On 5/28/13 1:50 AM, Damian Johnson wrote:
Hi Karsten. I'm starting to look into remote descriptor fetching, a
capability of metrics-lib that stem presently lacks [1][2]. The spec
says that mirrors provide zlib compressed data [3], and the
DirectoryDownloader handles this via a
: Karsten Loesing kars...@torproject.org
Date: Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: Metrics Plans
To: Damian Johnson ata...@torproject.org
Cc: Tor Assistants tor-assista...@lists.torproject.org
On 5/23/13 7:22 PM, Damian Johnson wrote:
Hi Karsten. I just finished reading over Kostas
(Sorry for cross-posting, but I think this is a topic for tor-dev@, not
tor-talk@. If you agree, please reply on tor-dev@ only. tor-talk@
people can follow the thread here:
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2013-June/thread.html)
On 6/6/13 7:32 PM, Norman Danner wrote:
I have two
On 6/7/13 8:04 PM, Norman Danner wrote:
On 6/7/13 2:37 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
(Sorry for cross-posting, but I think this is a topic for tor-dev@, not
tor-talk@. If you agree, please reply on tor-dev@ only. tor-talk@
people can follow the thread here:
OK, following up on tor-dev. I
Hi all,
I'd like to schedule an IRC meeting to discuss what progress we made on
sponsor F deliverables in June. Suggested time and place are:
Wed July 3, 16:00 to 17:00 UTC in #tor-dev
That time in other timezones is:
9:00 in San Francisco
12:00 in Boston
18:00 in Berlin
19:00 in
On 6/20/13 7:44 PM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to schedule an IRC meeting to discuss what progress we made on
sponsor F deliverables in June. Suggested time and place are:
Wed July 3, 16:00 to 17:00 UTC in #tor-dev
That time in other timezones is:
9:00 in San
On 6/26/13 5:59 PM, Norman Danner wrote:
Continuing this discussion of client behavior simulation...
I'm in the process of rewriting the data collection code..
One thing I need to do is make a reasonable guess as to whether a given
connection is from a client. Is there a straightforward
On 6/29/13 7:19 PM, m...@rndm.de wrote:
- Is this an Atlas fork or a rewrite? Are you planning to contribute
your changes to Atlas, or do you want to run this as a new project? In
the former case, please be sure to talk to Arturo or Sathya (both are on
this list). In the latter case, please
1 - 100 of 434 matches
Mail list logo
