Thanks to all for the wealth of valuable information I have received.
I am officially a onion service believer now, and my understanding has
grown exponentially!
On 06/03/18 19:38, Roger Dingledine wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 07:27:32PM +, Michael Jonker wrote:
They have asked me to
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 07:27:32PM +, Michael Jonker wrote:
> They have asked me to ask here also if, when connected to a hidden service,
> the circuit becomes "dirty" after default 10 minutes and resets?
No, onion services use the opposite logic: once you open a circuit to
the onion service,
Thanks Alec,
I am wrapping my head around alot at the moment, yesterday was the first
day I had an onion service!
I am passing the information and links you have provided back to the
Bisq network engineers (this is unfortunately not where I am at).
They have asked me to ask here also if, w
On 6 March 2018 at 17:54, Michael Jonker wrote:
> 2) Bisq 's infrastructural backbone runs as a P2P network over TOR
> network. Clients talk to each other and there are various hidden services
> providing network resources.
>
At the risk of blowing my own trumpet, I tried writing up suggestion
Thanks Tom and Alec,
I am working on a UX architecture for the Bisq Project
[https://bisq.network/]. This is a decentralised P2P crypto / fiat exchange.
The threat model is two-fold:
1) A real time event driven MVC for a GUI front-end to a remote API over
TOR hidden service. The client own
On 6 March 2018 at 10:55, Michael Jonker wrote:
> 2) Am I perpetrating a security anti-pattern by holding the connection open
> indeterminately?
Unless I'm missing something: no more so leaving a modern web
application tab (Facebook, gmail) open indefinitely.
Which is to say, WebSockets, Faceboo
On 6 March 2018 at 16:55, Michael Jonker wrote:
> I have connected to my hidden service with RFC 6455 web-socket and feel
> like a kid in a candy store streaming API requests and return data back and
> forth at good, reliable speeds.
Yay! Good to hear news of new successes. I found websockets