Anyone know what HoneyPot was/is?
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/F77FD005BF74CD0B4C611389C3006452AEC60CA3
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Mirimir: aside from the nickname, do you have any reason to believe it was
out of the ordinary? The exit policy mostly only seems to allow
non-encrypted services (80 but not 443, 143
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Mirimir wrote:
> Anyone know what HoneyPot was/is?
>
>
>
Green Dream:
> Mirimir: aside from the nickname, do you have any reason to believe it was
> out of the ordinary? The exit policy mostly only seems to allow
> non-encrypted services (80 but not 443, 143
A while ago we were actively marking nodes that only allowed
non-encrypted services as BadExit,
(Oops, sorry, an errant keyboard shortcut sent the email too early.)
Mirimir: aside from the nickname, do you have any reason to believe it was
out of the ordinary? The exit policy mostly only seems to allow
non-encrypted services (80 but not 443, 143 but not 993), but that alone
isn't enough to
On 10/29/2015 03:05 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
> Green Dream:
>> Mirimir: aside from the nickname, do you have any reason to believe it was
>> out of the ordinary? The exit policy mostly only seems to allow
>> non-encrypted services (80 but not 443, 143
>
> A while ago we were actively marking nodes
Probably someone being cute in their naming scheme.
Nchinda^2, -0.1743*kg^6 m^4 mol s^-14, @firescar96
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Mirimir wrote:
> Anyone know what HoneyPot was/is?
>
>
> https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/F77FD005BF74CD0B4C611389C3006452AEC60CA3
>
On 10/29/2015 02:42 PM, Green Dream wrote:
> (Oops, sorry, an errant keyboard shortcut sent the email too early.)
>
> Mirimir: aside from the nickname, do you have any reason to believe it was
> out of the ordinary? The exit policy mostly only seems to allow
> non-encrypted services (80 but not
Is the end of the month. Maybe they ran out of bandwidth and will be
back 11/1. LeaseWeb over-limit rates are terrifying.
BTW the exit policy includes 443.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> BTW the exit policy includes 443.
My mistake. I didn't realize the policy view on Atlas is truncated.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Given the current state of the internet (ie, massive warrantless spying
by LEO's and packet inspection by ISP's) I cannot imagine how any TOR
operator would block encrypted services and not be what most reasonable
people consider a "Bad exit".
On 2015-10-29 14:05, Mike Perry wrote:
> Green
> I cannot imagine how any TOR operator would block encrypted services
> and not be what most reasonable people consider a "Bad exit".
It turns out this "HoneyPot" node is NOT blocking encrypted services. They
allow ports 443, 993, and other encrypted services. Unfortunately that line
of the
On 10/29/2015 05:20 PM, Green Dream wrote:
>> I cannot imagine how any TOR operator would block encrypted services
>> and not be what most reasonable people consider a "Bad exit".
>
>
> It turns out this "HoneyPot" node is NOT blocking encrypted services. They
> allow ports 443, 993, and other
8e10f0be03478ac378eb8562bd71e3757734fd75
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 05:25:31PM -0600, Mirimir wrote:
> On 10/29/2015 05:20 PM, Green Dream wrote:
> > Unfortunately that line
> > of the exit policy isn't displayed on Atlas. You can see the full policy on
> > Globe:
> >
> >
On 10/29/2015 09:18 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 05:25:31PM -0600, Mirimir wrote:
>> On 10/29/2015 05:20 PM, Green Dream wrote:
>>> Unfortunately that line
>>> of the exit policy isn't displayed on Atlas. You can see the full policy on
>>> Globe:
>>>
>>>
15 matches
Mail list logo