Re: [tor-relays] Memory Problems with tor releay

2017-05-22 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:48:31PM +0200, niftybunny wrote: > Same with 0.3.0.5. Upgrading to 0.3.0.7 helped on most relays. We didn't change anything between 0.3.0.5 and 0.3.0.7 that would have helped. If somebody with a really really fast CPU wants to run their relay under valgrind

Re: [tor-relays] Memory Problems with tor releay

2017-05-22 Thread niftybunny
Same with 0.3.0.5. Upgrading to 0.3.0.7 helped on most relays. niftybunny ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net Where ignorance is bliss, 'Tis folly to be wise. Thomas Gray > On 22. May 2017, at 20:29, tor-relay.d...@o.banes.ch wrote: > > Dear all, > > we are operating two exit nodes with each two

Re: [tor-relays] Problem starting 0.3.0.7 on Ubuntu?

2017-05-22 Thread Alexander Dietrich
On 2017-05-22 10:23, nusenu wrote: Please post your configuration file /etc/tor/torrc (without sensitive content like password hashes) It's not very exciting, with all comments removed: -- HeartbeatPeriod 1 hours SOCKSPort 0 HiddenServiceDir /var/lib/tor/SERVICE_NAME/

Re: [tor-relays] Memory Problems with tor releay

2017-05-22 Thread Florentin Rochet
Le 22/05/17 à 20:29, tor-relay.d...@o.banes.ch a écrit : Dear all, we are operating two exit nodes with each two tor processes out of Switzerland. The nodes worked quite stable until about 2-3 weeks ago. Since then we experience frequent disruptions (Up to several times a day). This is

Re: [tor-relays] Memory Problems with tor releay

2017-05-22 Thread Tyler Durden
Hi We do also experience high memory consumptions by Tor from time to time which result in a total halt of the system. I'm now testing several values in MaxMemInQueues... Greetings tor-relay.d...@o.banes.ch: > Dear all, > > we are operating two exit nodes with each two tor processes out of >

[tor-relays] Memory Problems with tor releay

2017-05-22 Thread tor-relay . dirk
Dear all, we are operating two exit nodes with each two tor processes out of Switzerland. The nodes worked quite stable until about 2-3 weeks ago. Since then we experience frequent disruptions (Up to several times a day). This is caused by a significant rise in memory consumption by the tor

Re: [tor-relays] Legal Status of Relays Worldwide [was: kittens seized]

2017-05-22 Thread Nagaev Boris
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 8:47 PM, grarpamp wrote: That's actually why the torservers.net people suggest *not* using disk encryption. Having no barriers makes it much easier for the police to realize that there's nothing useful to them. > >>> This falling over may

Re: [tor-relays] Problem starting 0.3.0.7 on Ubuntu?

2017-05-22 Thread nusenu
>>> The permissions on /var/lib/tor/SERVICE_NAME/ are "rwx--S---" and >>> it's owned by debian-tor, which worked for 0.2.9.10. >> >> What user is your tor process running as? > > The Ubuntu packages from d.t.o run Tor as "debian-tor". I would expect > 0.3.0.7 to do the same, but it dies

Re: [tor-relays] Problem starting 0.3.0.7 on Ubuntu?

2017-05-22 Thread Alexander Dietrich
On 2017-05-22 04:07, teor wrote: The permissions on /var/lib/tor/SERVICE_NAME/ are "rwx--S---" and it's owned by debian-tor, which worked for 0.2.9.10. What user is your tor process running as? The Ubuntu packages from d.t.o run Tor as "debian-tor". I would expect 0.3.0.7 to do the same,

Re: [tor-relays] Doing the english [Was: Kitten1 and kitten2 compromised (guard/hs/fallback directory)]

2017-05-22 Thread Jim
Anders Andersson wrote: On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: I have mused about this myself. The most curious thing is that English is not even consistent with itself here. Think about the title of a famous enlightenment era novel. The meaning of the