[tor-relays] getrelays

Neet relays 发送自 Windows 10 版邮件应用 ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] MaxMemInQueues - per host, or per instance?

> On 23 Dec 2017, at 10:59, r1610091651 wrote: > > So > it will hurt Tor if we have too little buffers -> killing circuits -> > unstable connections > it will hurt Tor if we have too much buffers -> process out of control -> > unstable instance > > Would it be

Re: [tor-relays] MaxMemInQueues - per host, or per instance?

So it will hurt Tor if we have too little buffers -> killing circuits -> unstable connections it will hurt Tor if we have too much buffers -> process out of control -> unstable instance Would it be possible to guestimate typical circuit buffer size? One could then estimate value not too big /

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay Online/Working on AWS Cloud Torproject

> Speaking of which, I do wonder what the thoughts are on this idea. I > would like to have two derivatives of the cloud package, one for > novices and one for those who do not consider themselves novices. The > novice package will be centrally managed by Puppet, so all the user > has to do is

Re: [tor-relays] Become a Fallback Directory Mirror

On December 22, 2017 5:55:16 PM EST, "Fabian A. Santiago" wrote: >On December 22, 2017 5:48:59 PM EST, teor wrote: >> >>> On 23 Dec 2017, at 04:09, Fabian A. Santiago >> wrote: >>> >>> well, i intend to keep mine up

Re: [tor-relays] Become a Fallback Directory Mirror

On December 22, 2017 5:48:59 PM EST, teor wrote: > >> On 23 Dec 2017, at 04:09, Fabian A. Santiago > wrote: >> >> well, i intend to keep mine up indefinitely (barring the unforeseen) >so why not? >> >> 2 relays: >> >>

Re: [tor-relays] Become a Fallback Directory Mirror

> On 22 Dec 2017, at 22:19, Aneesh Dogra wrote: > > Thanks for your reply. I have added my DirPort in torcc as 9030 and restarted > my relay. Let me know if you need anything else. I'm still not seeing a DirPort in Relay Search:

Re: [tor-relays] Become a Fallback Directory Mirror

> On 23 Dec 2017, at 04:09, Fabian A. Santiago > wrote: > > well, i intend to keep mine up indefinitely (barring the unforeseen) so why > not? > > 2 relays: > > D122094E396DF8BA560843E7B983B0EA649B7DF9 > E911A899D51036A5D2A9DE0931A0A1E8DA4C6148 Hi, Fallbacks

Re: [tor-relays] warning messages

> On 23 Dec 2017, at 08:08, Arisbe wrote: > > Hello All, > > In recent weeks I have noticed some warning messages on several of my VPS > relays [1], [2]. > > "20:48:48.000 [warn] Tried to establish rendezvous on non-ORcircuit with > purpose Acting as rendevous (pending)" >

Re: [tor-relays] first impression with 0.3.2.8-rcant a fast exit relay

> On 23 Dec 2017, at 03:38, Conrad Rockenhaus wrote: > > I just brought a 0.3.2.8 relay online at OVH, ConradsOVHRelay, > A5C6D2EBCCA77D0B09364DD6B75FEC817AF977FA. For some reason Atlas says the > bandwidth is 0, but I have it set to 625. I guess we’ll see how it does

Re: [tor-relays] MaxMemInQueues - per host, or per instance?

On 22 Dec (20:37:37), r1610091651 wrote: > I'm wondering if it is necessary to have a lot of ram assigned to queues? > Is there some rule of thumb to determine the proper sizing? Based on number > of circuits maybe? So there are probably many different answers to this or ways to look at it but I

[tor-relays] warning messages

Hello All, In recent weeks I have noticed some warning messages on several of my VPS relays [1], [2]. "20:48:48.000 [warn] Tried to establish rendezvous on non-ORcircuit with purpose Acting as rendevous (pending)" I get these in modest numbers as (97 hidden). Is this a characteristic of

Re: [tor-relays] Become a Fallback Directory Mirror

Tim, 5E56738E7F97AA81DEEF59AF28494293DFBFCCDF Thanks, Hostmaster@: Mr. Dennis Emory Hannon BackplaneDNS.org / Backplane LLC Phone: +1 (716) 348-0064 Linkedin: http://linkedin.com/in/dennis-hannon-52236019/ ___ tor-relays mailing

Re: [tor-relays] MaxMemInQueues - per host, or per instance?

I'm wondering if it is necessary to have a lot of ram assigned to queues? Is there some rule of thumb to determine the proper sizing? Based on number of circuits maybe? Do the wise-minds have a guidance on this one? On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 at 21:08 Igor Mitrofanov

Re: [tor-relays] MaxMemInQueues - per host, or per instance?

Thanks. I do have the IP space. It is a pity multiple instances cannot watch the overall RAM remaining. I have quite a bit of RAM left, but there are large discrepancies in terms of how much RAM different relays are using (>3 GB for some, <1 GB for others), so it will be tricky to set

Re: [tor-relays] MaxMemInQueues - per host, or per instance?

It would expect it to be per instance. Instances are independent of each other. Further one can only run 2 instances max / ip. On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 at 20:40 Igor Mitrofanov wrote: > Hi, > > Is MaxMemInQueues parameter per-host (global) or per-instance? > Say, there

[tor-relays] MaxMemInQueues - per host, or per instance?

Hi, Is MaxMemInQueues parameter per-host (global) or per-instance? Say, there are 10 relays on the same 24 GB host. Should I set MaxMemInQueues to 20 GB, or 2 GB in each torrc? Thanks, Igor ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org

Re: [tor-relays] Recent wave of abuse on Tor guards

> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:11:47PM +0100, Felix wrote: > My current thought is that these are actually Tor clients, not intentional > denial-of-service attacks, but there are millions of them so they are > producing surprises and damage. (Also, maybe there is not a human behind > each of the Tor

Re: [tor-relays] Become a Fallback Directory Mirror

December 20, 2017 6:51 PM, "teor" wrote: > Dear Relay Operators, > > Do you want your relay to be a Tor fallback directory mirror? > Will it have the same address and port for the next 2 years? > Just reply to this email with your relay's fingerprint. > > If your relay is

Re: [tor-relays] Become a Fallback Directory Mirror

AA0D167E03E298F9A8CD50F448B81FBD7FA80D56 ++ 21/12/17 10:50 +1100 - teor: >Dear Relay Operators, > >Do you want your relay to be a Tor fallback directory mirror? >Will it have the same address and port for the next 2 years? >Just reply to this email with your relay's fingerprint. > >If your relay

Re: [tor-relays] first impression with 0.3.2.8-rcant a fast exit relay

I just brought a 0.3.2.8 relay online at OVH, ConradsOVHRelay, A5C6D2EBCCA77D0B09364DD6B75FEC817AF977FA. For some reason Atlas says the bandwidth is 0, but I have it set to 625. I guess we’ll see how it does later. Conrad > On Dec 22, 2017, at 8:48 AM, David Goulet

Re: [tor-relays] first impression with 0.3.2.8-rc at a fast exit relay

On 12/22/2017 03:48 PM, David Goulet wrote: > Are you on BSD or Linux? I do run a stable Gentoo hardened Linux with latest kernel (4.14.8 currently) and LibreSSL-2.6.4. OTOH I was informed by my ISP that the server is being under attack currently - will observe its behaviour over the next

Re: [tor-relays] Recent wave of abuse on Tor guards

I got also 17 from ovh (under ip-54-36-51.eu) and plenty of leaseweb.com (didn't count) too but no your-server.de The OVH ones were interestingly 2 (nearby) consecutive blocks of 4 and 13 IPs (and are not relays) On 22 December 2017 at 15:23, Tyler Johnson wrote: > Every

Re: [tor-relays] Recent wave of abuse on Tor guards

Every IP I was checking through Atlas which are part of the mentioned hosts were NOT relays, all client connections. On Dec 22, 2017 9:20 AM, "niftybunny" wrote: > Thats “only” “relays” with multiple connections to your relay? > Interesting to see Hetzner there …

Re: [tor-relays] Recent wave of abuse on Tor guards

Thats “only” “relays” with multiple connections to your relay? Interesting to see Hetzner there … Markus > On 22. Dec 2017, at 16:14, Tyler Johnson wrote: > > Out off 133 IPs blocked with my rather aggressive firewall ruleset: > > leaseweb.com -

Re: [tor-relays] Recent wave of abuse on Tor guards

Out off 133 IPs blocked with my rather aggressive firewall ruleset: leaseweb.com - 26 your-server.de - 66 ip-54-36-51.eu - 17 That was in < 24hrs. On Dec 22, 2017 3:38 AM, "niftybunny" wrote: > Short answer: > > https://i.imgur.com/8QLptcz.png > > Around 15000 -

Re: [tor-relays] first impression with 0.3.2.8-rcant a fast exit relay

On 22 Dec (00:20:38), Toralf Förster wrote: > With 0.3.2.7-rc the command > /usr/sbin/iftop -B -i eth0 -P -N -n -m 320M > showed every then and when (few times in a hour) for 10-20 sec a traffic > value of nearly 0 bytes for the short-term period (the left of the 3 values). > Usuaally I do

Re: [tor-relays] Become a Fallback Directory Mirror

You can throw 867B95CACD64653FEEC4D2CEFC5C49B4620307A7 into the mix - its my only stable server with little load. I would have IPv6 but OVH AU has some sort of problem - have had a ticket open for two weeks now. Paul ___ tor-relays mailing list

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay Online/Working on AWS Cloud Torproject

Conrad Rockenhaus: > I noticed this when I started it up. It appears that the version of > Tor on EPEL is out of date. I’ll build it out of source to fix it. > I’ll probably have to do that for the Cloud solution as well since > the lifecycle of EPEL is normally behind. 0.2.9.14 reached stable

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay Online/Working on AWS Cloud Torproject

Hello. I use AWS to test the alpha release, on the free tier. If you dont mind me asking, I am interested to know what you are doing to avoid a bill Amazon bill at the end of the month. I think I had about 30GB data transfer or so & a few other things and they sent me a bill for USD 0.70 ish

Re: [tor-relays] Recent wave of abuse on Tor guards

Short answer: https://i.imgur.com/8QLptcz.png Around 15000 - 18000 connections I can see with netstat. Even my 300 mbit exit has less and there a a lot of Leaseweb clients connecting to me ... The interesting thing is, it comes and goes in waves. From 6000