Re: [tor-relays] No exit at home !!!

> Use ISP's only for exits. Or you want "fun". Some run exits from home because they have prepared in advance for, and do not mind, or simply enjoy, such free[dom] "fun", and wish to make a point and or cases. They could be considered activists. If not prepared, or in jurisdictions that do not

[tor-relays] Port not rechable

I've opend the ports in my router. Could anybody be so kind to check my log and tell me wether it's ok or not? Mar 03 00:05:38.000 [notice] Self-testing indicates your ORPort is reachable from the outside. Excellent. Mar 03 00:05:45.000 [notice] Performing bandwidth self-test...done. Mar 03

[tor-relays] Disk encryption for relays [was: FreeBSD 11.1 ZFS Tor Image]

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:09:36PM -0500, Otheontelth wrote: > Why would it be important to encrypt the storage of your tor server? > For me this looks like it only complicates things if law enforcement wants > to take a look at your server and the cloud provider should be able to break > the

Re: [tor-relays] Running a relay at home

On Friday, March 2, 2018 2:22:00 PM CST George wrote: > Matthew Finkel: > > On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 03:01:31PM -0500, Roger Dingledine wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 07:42:11PM +, Matthew Finkel wrote: > >>> Are you running this relay at your home? If yes, then that is not > >>>

Re: [tor-relays] less than 3 bw auths available: self-measurement (with 10k cap in effect)

> On 3 Mar 2018, at 02:15, Stijn Jonker wrote: > > On 2 Mar 2018, at 12:08, Vasilis wrote: > > Hi, > > Roger Dingledine: > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 06:47:00PM +, nusenu wrote: > > if your relays behave strangely in terms of bandwidth seen, than this > might be due to

Re: [tor-relays] Port not rechable

Hi! On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 09:34:02PM +0100, peter.zehet...@liwest.at wrote: > OK, now I've set PortForwarding in Tor-Arm from "False" to "True", then > restarted Tor: Hrm, I'm not sure this will do what you want. In fact, this may do absolutely nothing. Do you have administative access into

Re: [tor-relays] No exit at home !!!

Hi, for this post anon: > Roger say it right: No exit relay at home! > > I write this mail in anon because I had bad experience with that. I had > the experience to get visitors early in the morning from the police > department some months ago. After that I must by new computers... Can you

[tor-relays] Port not rechable

OK, now I've set PortForwarding in Tor-Arm from "False" to "True", then restarted Tor: ...has not managed to confirm that its DirPort is reachable. Relays do not publish descriptors until their ORPort and DirPort are reachable. Please check... I'm going to run a non-exit-relay and I'm going

Re: [tor-relays] Running a relay at home

Matthew Finkel: > On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 03:01:31PM -0500, Roger Dingledine wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 07:42:11PM +, Matthew Finkel wrote: >>> Are you running this relay at your home? If yes, then that is not >>> recommended, but >> >> For the record, it's running *exit* relays at home

Re: [tor-relays] less than 3 bw auths available: self-measurement (with 10k cap in effect)

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 02:02:19PM -0500, Roger Dingledine wrote: > Yep! We had 4 running, but 2 of them had problems, and we need 3 > for the authorities to want to use the values from them. > > moria1 is one that had problems, so I'm hoping to have that resolved > shortly. And all four of them

Re: [tor-relays] Running a relay at home (was: Port not rechable)

On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 03:01:31PM -0500, Roger Dingledine wrote: > On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 07:42:11PM +, Matthew Finkel wrote: > > Are you running this relay at your home? If yes, then that is not > > recommended, but > > For the record, it's running *exit* relays at home that is not >

[tor-relays] No exit at home !!!

Roger say it right: No exit relay at home! I write this mail in anon because I had bad experience with that. I had the experience to get visitors early in the morning from the police department some months ago. After that I must by new computers... Use ISP's only for exits. Or you want "fun".

Re: [tor-relays] Port not rechable

On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 07:42:11PM +, Matthew Finkel wrote: > Are you running this relay at your home? If yes, then that is not > recommended, but For the record, it's running *exit* relays at home that is not recommended. Running non-exit relays at home is typically fine -- the most likely

Re: [tor-relays] Port not rechable

On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 08:27:29PM +0100, peter.zehet...@liwest.at wrote: > Hi, I'm still trying to run a tor delay. Here's the error: > Thank you for running a relay. > Your server (81.10.248.112:80) has not managed to confirm that its DirPort is > reachable. Relays do not publish descriptors

Re: [tor-relays] Port not rechable

_Something_ is blocking port 80. $ nmap -sT 81.10.248.112 -p 80 -Pn Starting Nmap 7.01 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2018-03-02 11:38 PST Nmap scan report for cm248-112.liwest.at (81.10.248.112) Host is up. PORT STATESERVICE 80/tcp filtered http Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up)

[tor-relays] Port not rechable

There is no firewall installed. Peter Have you double-checked your firewall? -Cody On 03/02/2018 11:27 AM, peter.zehet...@liwest.at mailto:peter.zehet...@liwest.at wrote: > > Hi, I'm still trying to run a tor delay. Here's the error: > > Your server (81.10.248.112:80) has not managed to

Re: [tor-relays] Port not rechable

Have you double-checked your firewall? -Cody On 03/02/2018 11:27 AM, peter.zehet...@liwest.at wrote: > > Hi, I'm still trying to run a tor delay. Here's the error: > > Your server (81.10.248.112:80) has not managed to confirm that its > DirPort is reachable. Relays do not publish descriptors

[tor-relays] Port not rechable

Hi, I'm still trying to run a tor delay. Here's the error: Your server (81.10.248.112:80) has not managed to confirm that its DirPort is reachable. Relays do not publish descriptors until their ORPort and DirPort are reachable. But canyouseeme.org said: Your ISP is not blocking port 80

Re: [tor-relays] less than 3 bw auths available: self-measurement (with 10k cap in effect)

Hi, Roger Dingledine: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 06:47:00PM +, nusenu wrote: >> if your relays behave strangely in terms of bandwidth seen, than this >> might be due to the fact that there are less than 3 bw auth votes available. >> >> If you run a fast relay it is capped to 10k cw. >> >>

Re: [tor-relays] [WARN] Your computer is too slow to handle this many circuit creation requests

Hi, Running for more than a week the alpha version 0.3.3.2 (git-7b1d356bdb76607d) the issue seems to be resolved. Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 7 days 11:59 hours, with 19157 circuits open. I've sent 2372.16 GB and received 2372.27 GB. Cheers, ~Vasilis -- Fingerprint: 8FD5 CF5F 39FC 03EB B382

[tor-relays] Firewalls

Hi to all, I have a simple question, what is the best firewall solution ? With sourcecode and must be opensource. What do you mean ? regards Steffen TorGate torgate(at)linux-hus.dk OpenGPG 7FD5 65EF A4EF EEF3 7A13 4372 8409 49D6 01A2 0890 signature.asc Description: Message signed with