Re: [tor-relays] ISP Nat

> On 14 Mar 2018, at 01:28, Paul Templeton wrote: > > Thanks nusenu > >> I'd say this is broken network and ask them to fix it. > Ticket has been lodge but it takes for ever to get something done - The node > has been off line for two weeks now (After a power issue in the

Re: [tor-relays] middle relay connexions dropped in half

> On 13 Mar 2018, at 20:51, mytormail wrote: > > I just doesn't feel right if donated capacity isn't used. Oh, but your relay's spare capacity *is* used. Just not the way you think. A congested relay is a slow and unstable relay. A relay with extra capacity has lower

Re: [tor-relays] ISP Nat

Thanks nusenu > I'd say this is broken network and ask them to fix it. Ticket has been lodge but it takes for ever to get something done - The node has been off line for two weeks now (After a power issue in the rack). There has been issue after issue getting the system up again and now this.

Re: [tor-relays] ISP Nat

>> Can you elaborate on your network topology and NAT? > > Out bound traffic from 95.130.9.210 goes via 95.130.9.1 then 95.130.8.1 then > out to the real world. outbound: [ 95.130.9.210 ] --> [outbound gw 95.130.9.1 ] --> [2th hop 95.130.8.1 ] --> inet > In bound traffic comes via

Re: [tor-relays] middle relay connexions dropped in half

Yes, I have experienced the same thing; my throughput is slower as well. Not only have I dropped from about 2,000 connexions to 1, 000; my rate has gone down as well: #vnstat -d 02/21/201816.83 GiB | 16.59 GiB | 33.42 GiB |3.24 Mbit/s 02/22/201818.73 GiB | 18.49

Re: [tor-relays] ISP Nat

> Can you elaborate on your network topology and NAT? Out bound traffic from 95.130.9.210 goes via 95.130.9.1 then 95.130.8.1 then out to the real world. In bound traffic comes via 95.130.8.11 then 9.130.8.120 It's NATted at 95.130.8.11 and all I see is this address connected to the system(ie

[tor-relays] "Received http status code 404 ("Consensus is too old")" keeps popping up in my logs

I'm just wondering if there is anything I can do to resolve this. The relay is running ntpd and consistently keeps the right time, and I'm not getting this from any other server (it's the same IP address every time). Is this of concern or should I just ignore it? Will it hinder the relay's

Re: [tor-relays] ISP Nat

Paul Templeton: > Hi All, > > I have an ISP who has started NATting inbound traffic and has screwed > DNS resolution. Is there a way to bind DNS requests to use a specific > IP address (Have multiple) that is not affected with this NATting > problem. Can you elaborate on your network topology

Re: [tor-relays] Relay node requirements

> we need some recommendations on what setup is > needed as a minimum to be actually useful for the network. The relay guide might be of use to you: https://torproject.org/relay-guide#RelayRequirements > I've been checking on metrics.torproject.org on stats for my own node, > is that the best

Re: [tor-relays] ISP Nat

> and has screwed DNS resolution. ;; reply from unexpected source: 95.130.8.11#53, expected 95.130.8.8#53 ;; reply from unexpected source: 95.130.8.11#53, expected 95.130.8.9#53 This is the problem I'm having... 609662E824251C283164243846C035C803940378

Re: [tor-relays] middle relay connexions dropped in half

Hi, I am curious if your relay is back on speed now. I experience the same thing. Since the latest update my two "fast" relay's (around 5100KB) have now dropped to half the speed and seem to go slower as time goes by. Processor is hardly used, memory is no issue, logs seem okay. My other two

Re: [tor-relays] Relay node requirements

Hi Sqrrm. There was previously the Oniontip site that supported relay and exit owners. It would be worth you reviewing that project on github as Tor infrastructure components were rewarded according to their throughput and consensus weight. S On March 13, 2018 2:24:42 PM UTC, sqrrm

[tor-relays] Relay node requirements

The distributed bitcoin exchange Bisq is reliant on Tor as a communication layer and as such dependent on its stability. To support the network we're looking at incentivizing contributors to run their own Tor relay nodes. For this we need some recommendations on what setup is needed as a minimum

[tor-relays] Relay operators meetup @ CSOA Forte Prenestino, Rome, Italy

Dear relay operators and *Tor people, A number of people will participate this Thursday Thursday 15/03/18, 18:30 @ CSOA Forte Prenestino in Rome, Italy [1]. Hope to see many of you there. [1] https://blog.torproject.org/events/relay-operators-meetup-csoa-forte-prenestino-rome-italy Cheers,

[tor-relays] ISP Nat

Hi All, I have an ISP who has started NATting inbound traffic and has screwed DNS resolution. Is there a way to bind DNS requests to use a specific IP address (Have multiple) that is not affected with this NATting problem. Paul 609662E824251C283164243846C035C803940378