Re: [tor-relays] Let's increase the amount of exit relays doing DNSSEC validation

2018-04-10 Thread Paul Templeton
Hi All, Is there anyone who uses Bind9? I'll setup DNSSEC on all Exits but I would like to validate the config. I have done this on 41781FDC57238DAB955DF6D6E8400CEC5ACBE706 options { directory "/var/cache/bind"; dnssec-enable yes; dnssec-validation yes;

Re: [tor-relays] Let's increase the amount of exit relays doing DNSSEC validation

2018-04-10 Thread Dhalgren Tor
Respectfully, I disagree. https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2015-October/007904.html Thank you for the thought however. ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org

Re: [tor-relays] Let's increase the amount of exit relays doing DNSSEC validation

2018-04-10 Thread teor
Hi, Please consider using BCC next time you remove obfuscation from people's emails, and then send out a mass email. T ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Let's increase the amount of exit relays doing DNSSEC validation

2018-04-10 Thread Ralph Seichter
On 09.04.18 13:10, nusenu wrote: > I recommend a local caching unbound (https://unbound.net/) DNS > resolver without using an upstream DNS forwarder. No forwarders indeed. Additionally, I recommend the following settings in the unbound.conf of Tor exits: # Disable logging. log-queries: no

Re: [tor-relays] new warning with Tor 0.3.4.0-alpha-dev (git-efc105716283bbdf)

2018-04-10 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 07:32:19PM +0100, Toralf Förster wrote: > Feb 19 18:59:00.000 [warn] Our clock is 1 minutes, 1 seconds behind the time > published in the consensus network status document (2018-02-19 18:00:00 UTC). > Tor needs an accurate clock to work correctly. Please check your time

[tor-relays] Let's increase the amount of exit relays doing DNSSEC validation

2018-04-10 Thread nusenu
Dear Tor Exit Relay Operator, thanks for operating tor exit relays! In addition to forwarding packets exit relays also do DNS hostname resolution on behalf of tor clients. DNSSEC [1] is a standard that allows DNS clients to validate the authenticity of DNS records (if the domain owner choose to

Re: [tor-relays] No stable flag from 6 out of 9?

2018-04-10 Thread Ole Rydahl
> -Oprindelig meddelelse- > Fra: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] På vegne af > Vasilis > Sendt: 10. april 2018 13:08 > Til: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > Emne: Re: [tor-relays] No stable flag from 6 out of 9? > > Hi Ole, > > Ole Rydahl: > > I'll be

Re: [tor-relays] No stable flag from 6 out of 9?

2018-04-10 Thread Vasilis
Hi Ole, Ole Rydahl: > I'll be patient! (It took a while to obtain the stable flag from my wife > too.) /Ole It seems that your relay has gained the stable flag, can you please re-enable IPv6 connectivity so that we can find if that was the issue? Thanks, ~Vasilis -- Fingerprint: 8FD5 CF5F

Re: [tor-relays] Relay down again

2018-04-10 Thread Vasilis
Hi, smichel0: > Former my relay was connected via a powerline adapter and I often had > connection problems. > > Then I connected it directlia via a LAN to the router and it worked for 3 > days. This morning it was down again since 6 h (no traffic, no flags but the > netbook still said that

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Browser and Relay

2018-04-10 Thread Vasilis
Hi, Gary: > I wish to know if it is possible to have Tor Browser use my relay for > traffic instead of its own client on start up. It is possible but will most probably reduce significantly your anonymity as you will always connect to your relay and not the guard relay that you should be

[tor-relays] Relay down again

2018-04-10 Thread smichel0
Hello! Former my relay was connected via a powerline adapter and I often had connection problems. Then I connected it directlia via a LAN to the router and it worked for 3 days. This morning it was down again since 6 h (no traffic, no flags but the netbook still said that there is a internet