Re: [tor-relays] Prepping bridges for censorship

2018-06-22 Thread Keifer Bly
Yes, that’s a good point. I just thought that on observing that, it might be too easy for a censoring isp to block tor just by blocking the ports the relays usually listen on, or identify tor easily by port number even when using obfscated bridges. Good point though, thanks Sent from my iPhone

Re: [tor-relays] Prepping bridges for censorship

2018-06-22 Thread teor
Hi, (This thread has a lot of top-posting, so I cut the context.) > On 23 Jun 2018, at 06:54, Matthew Glennon wrote: > > No - and I don't think a standard port should be chosen. Tor comes with > defaults and that's probably good enough. Keep them if you want, or customize > them to fit your s

Re: [tor-relays] Prepping bridges for censorship

2018-06-22 Thread Matthew Glennon
No - and I don't think a standard port should be chosen. Tor comes with defaults and that's probably good enough. Keep them if you want, or customize them to fit your situation - the consensus has no problem adjusting to your customer port numbers. On the contrary, allowing a bad actor to know (for

Re: [tor-relays] Prepping bridges for censorship

2018-06-22 Thread Keifer Bly
Yes, but are all guard and bridge relays configured like this? Maybe this should be a requirement for running a guard or bridge relay for this reason. What does everyone think? From: Matthew Glennon Sent: Friday, June 22, 2018 5:18 AM To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Prepping bridges for censorship

2018-06-22 Thread Matthew Glennon
This is the reasoning I go with for using 443/80. On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 8:11 AM Martin Kepplinger wrote: > Am 21.06.2018 21:48 schrieb Keifer Bly: > > Hi, > > > > So I had a thought. It seems like a lot of the relays run off of > > various port numbers (of course). However if all of the relays

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay Operators Needs

2018-06-22 Thread Matthew Glennon
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 4:14 PM Ian Zimmerman wrote: > On 2018-06-21 08:25, Matthew Glennon wrote: > > > Relays intending to act as Guards choose port 443 because it (and 80) are > > usually reachable in the tightest of network security situations (where > > traffic destined for most all other po

Re: [tor-relays] Prepping bridges for censorship

2018-06-22 Thread Martin Kepplinger
Am 21.06.2018 21:48 schrieb Keifer Bly: Hi, So I had a thought. It seems like a lot of the relays run off of various port numbers (of course). However if all of the relays and bridges are running off of various port numbers (ie 9001, 1, etc.), couldn’t this stop censored users (who’s isp or